Optical: systems and elements – Optical modulator – Light wave directional modulation
Reexamination Certificate
2000-02-15
2001-03-20
Epps, Georgia (Department: 2873)
Optical: systems and elements
Optical modulator
Light wave directional modulation
C359S305000, C359S627000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06204955
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to light direction control, and more particularly, to techniques for the dynamic control of light propagation direction.
2. The Prior Art
The dynamic control of light propagation direction is a fundamental technique in optics. Direct applications include laser radar systems, laser projection displays, target-tracking systems, land survey systems, entertainment, laser printers, laser machining, metrology, laser scanning, and optical communications.
Currently, there are four significant light deflection methods: electromechanical, acousto-optic, electro-optic, and electrically-controlled light grating methods. Of these four methods, electromechanical methods are used most frequently in commercial application products. Electromechanical methods use a rotating mirror or rotating prism as a mechanical device for changing light direction. These devices have a number of limitations due to the intrinsic nature of mechanical movement on a macroscopic scale. For example, they are relatively slow. Generally, it takes milliseconds for changing the light beam from one direction to another direction. Also, such systems are susceptible to interference from mechanical vibration.
The other three types of methods contain no mechanical moving parts at the macroscopic scale. However, the maximum deflection angle range often constitutes an important limiting factor to their performance. For example, the maximum deflection angle that the fully electronic control methods of the prior art can provide is generally less than ±3°. The small deflection angle essentially excludes electronic control methods from nearly all important practical applications. Electromechanically-controlled rotating mirror devices can provide moderately larger deflection angle. The maximum deflection angle for two-dimensional electromechanically-controlled rotating mirrors is usually much less than ±30°, limited by the geometry of mechanical parts. And, in many important light scanning applications, such as laser radar systems, a much larger scanning angle range is often required. Thus, even the maximum deflection angle range of the electromechanical systems is still insufficient.
In the prior art, U.S. Pat. No. 4,836,629, issued to Huignard, discloses a holographic multiplexer system for changing light beam direction in a broad field of view. The key component is a holographic multiplexer, the operation of which is based on the wave nature of light. Specifically, in the Huignard system, a light beam is split into multiple beams with different directions of propagation through the interference of coherent electromagnetic waves. Huignard then uses a shutter to select which of the light beams to output from the system. One shortcoming of the Huignard system is that the energy of the output light is only a small percentage of the input light energy. For example, if the holographic multiplex outputs a matrix of N×N=N
2
beams, each beam will have a maximum energy level of only 1/N
2
, and since N
2
is typically in the hundreds or thousands, the output energy is very small indeed when compared to the input energy.
It must be noted that the holographic hardware and process are often too complicated for practical applications. For example, Huignard's system uses an additional laser system, a two-dimensional phase modulator, and additional nonlinear optical material for pumping external laser energy back into the output light beam in order to compensate for the light energy lost in the holographic multiplexing process. Quantitatively, the additional laser must have a power output many times higher than that of the incident laser source in order to compensate for losses in the pumping system. Additionally, for the multiplexer to work, a rather delicate 2D detector system must be used to first record a hologram and then use a rather complex process to reconstruct the original wave front for providing multiple split beams. This all makes the Huignard system too complex and delicate for many practical applications.
In terms of classical geometry optics, the standard method for increasing an initially-deflected light beam deflection angle a small amount (typically ±5°) uses a light beam expander. As shown in
FIG. 2
, the beam expander is a lens system having two positive lenses sharing a common focal plane
112
. The focal length f
1
of one lens
102
is much larger than the focal length f
2
of the second lens
104
. When a well-collimated light beam travels from the second lens
104
to the first lens
102
, as at
106
, the beam size is increased by a factor of f
1
/f
2
. When a beam expander is used in the reverse direction, that is, from the first lens
102
to the second lens
104
, as at
108
, the beam size is reduced and the deflection angle of the input beam relative to the optical axis
110
is enlarged by a factor of f
1
/f
2
. When f
1
/f
2
is large, however, the most important limiting condition is the maximum deflection angle of the output light beam. The output light beam always goes from the output surface
114
of the small lens
104
to the optical axis
110
, and crosses the optical axis
110
at a distance &dgr; from the small lens
104
. The ratio of r/&dgr;, where r is the radius of the small lens
104
, directly determines the maximum deflection angle.
A telescope eyepiece has an even more specifically defined purpose. Because the user looks directly into the system with the eye, the light beam output is designed to be about 5 to 10 mm away from the surface of the small lens, and the light beam is about 2 mm in width to match the pupil size of a human's eye.
It can be seen, therefore, that the beam expander or a standard telescope eyepiece is a device that largely provides an output light beam in the near field. The maximum deflection angle range is very limited because the output light beam always goes towards the optical axis and the value of &dgr; cannot be very small. Also, the light beam distortion and degradation is large, because the output light beam comes from the edge of the lens. When a compound lens system is used, these lens system are designed to function at the near field of the lens system, not the far field. After the light beam passes through the optical axis and into the far field, the beam degradation often becomes unacceptable.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus for the control of the direction of a light beam.
Another object is to provide an apparatus for the control of the direction of a light beam over a wide range of angles.
The present invention provides an apparatus for extending the light deflection angle, so a light beam can be dynamically controlled to move to any direction in space within a large range of angles, typically ranging from ±90° in both pitch and yaw. The apparatus of the present invention can be applied to fully electronic control systems, free of mechanical moving parts. Because of this, the limitation of the electronic methods for light direction no longer apply, making available completely electronic control of a light beam in a broad angle range, free of any moving parts, for a broad spectrum of applications. Also, the apparatus of the present invention can be applied to systems containing rotating mirror or other moving parts as well.
The present invention uses simple classical geometry optics components to provide a system with dynamic control of light beam direction within a large angle range. All the geometry optics components are passive components without the need of pumping additional light energy into the system. The output light beam energy is typically within an order of magnitude of the incident light beam energy. The system structure is simple, and the system cost is significantly less than that of a holographic system.
The present invention is a light direction control device adapted for dynamically controlling the direction of an initial light beam emitted from a
Chao Yong-Sheng
Zhao Ying
Advanced Optical Technologies, Inc.
Epps Georgia
Morse, Altman & Martin
Seyrafi Saeed
LandOfFree
Apparatus for dynamic control of light direction in a broad... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Apparatus for dynamic control of light direction in a broad..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Apparatus for dynamic control of light direction in a broad... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2513242