Image analysis – Image enhancement or restoration
Patent
1995-09-06
1998-08-25
Rogers, Scott
Image analysis
Image enhancement or restoration
382263, 382266, 382275, 358447, 358463, G06K 944, G06T 500, H04N 1409
Patent
active
057991111
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to apparatus and methods for smoothing images, reducing noise and enhancing images.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A known problem is digital image noise reduction in the face of (a) randomly distributed noise, which is often additive, (b) fixed pattern noise due to imaging detector response non-uniformities, (c) analog recording noise of video signals due to video standard bandwidth limitations and luminance/chrominance signal formats, and (d) compression noise such as block noise and edge noise or mosquito noise created by block transform coding.
The need for image restoration in the face of noise exists in a wide range of applications such as electronic imaging and scanning, video recording equipment and analog and digital TV displays. Imaging sensors such as CCD-TV continuous and still cameras and medical imaging systems often face low light level situations, in which the image quality deteriorates due to reduced signal to noise ratios. Significant amplification of such video signals amplifies the various noise effects to the point where they are visible and disturbing to the observer.
Electronic noise in still-video images is usually perceived as high frequency noise. In image sequences, electronic noise fluctuates randomly due to its random statistical nature, and can therefore be reduced by temporal integration. Photo response non-uniformities of imaging detectors, such as CCD imagers, CCD image scanners and image facsimile machines, result in fixed-pattern noise. Its spatial structure depends on the internal design characteristics of the detector. CCD scanner detectors, for example, suffer from fixed-pattern noise caused by nonuniformities in the detector element responsivities. These are only partially correctable using digital calibrated processing schemes, the residual fixed-pattern noise remaining visible.
Fixed-pattern noise is particularly disturbing in still imagery. These effects are usually masked and not visually perceived in high contrast textured images. However, in low light level imaging situations where extensive signal amplification is required in order to perceive low contrasts, the fixed pattern noise effects are clearly visible and disturbing to the observer.
Image noise also appears in medical imaging applications, for example in ultrasound, and in photon-counting imaging systems. Image scanning applications also often require noise reduction, depending on the lighting conditions, and on the type of scanned data (imagery and text on paper or film).
Existing digital image-noise reduction techniques can generally be categorized into three classes: information for reducing image noise, exposure time of an image changing over time hence reducing temporal random fluctuations of image noise, and
Linear spatial smoothing operators, such as low pass filters, usually result in subjectively unacceptable blurring of essential high frequency image detail such as edges, lines and contours. More advanced filtering techniques such as Wiener filters adapt to local estimates of signal and noise according to statistical models of the signal noise processes, which are often difficult to define a-priori. This type of technique is discussed in Mahesh, B. et al, "Adaptive estimators for filtering noisy images", Optical engineering, 29(5), pp. 488-494; 1990.
A Wiener filter is an example of a more general class of filters known as Kalman filters, described in Gelb, A. (ed.) Applied optimal estimation, Technical staff, Analytic sciences corporation, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., USA, 1974.
Kalman filters require more intensive computation for local estimation of second order statistical parameters in the image. Kalman filtering techniques also rely on signal and noise models which are generally not appropriate for all images.
Other operators, such as median filters, do not require any a-priori knowledge of signal and noise models, and are designed to preserve high frequency edge signals while at the same time reducing the noise in smooth image region
REFERENCES:
patent: 4055756 (1977-10-01), Jolivet et al.
patent: 4167749 (1979-09-01), Burrus
patent: 4179709 (1979-12-01), Workman
patent: 4222077 (1980-09-01), Yamada
patent: 4237481 (1980-12-01), Aughton
patent: 4242705 (1980-12-01), Ebihara
patent: 4246610 (1981-01-01), Takahashi
patent: 4270141 (1981-05-01), Sakamoto
patent: 4317179 (1982-02-01), Kato et al.
patent: 4319260 (1982-03-01), Tasch, Jr. et al.
patent: 4330833 (1982-05-01), Pratt et al.
patent: 4335398 (1982-06-01), Yamada
patent: 4335407 (1982-06-01), Atoji et al.
patent: 4365304 (1982-12-01), Ruhman et al.
patent: 4441121 (1984-04-01), Harwood et al.
patent: 4442454 (1984-04-01), Powell
patent: 4549212 (1985-10-01), Bayer
patent: 4553165 (1985-11-01), Bayer
patent: 4590608 (1986-05-01), Chen et al.
patent: 4648120 (1987-03-01), Chittineni
patent: 4654863 (1987-03-01), Belfield et al.
patent: 4672437 (1987-06-01), Casper
patent: 4710822 (1987-12-01), Matsunawa
patent: 4751585 (1988-06-01), Shibazaki
patent: 4764971 (1988-08-01), Sullivan
patent: 4774682 (1988-09-01), White
patent: 4792854 (1988-12-01), Glenn
patent: 4817180 (1989-03-01), Cho et al.
patent: 4918633 (1990-04-01), Sullivan
patent: 4945502 (1990-07-01), Kwon et al.
patent: 4992961 (1991-02-01), Petersen
patent: 5031227 (1991-07-01), Raasch et al.
patent: 5131057 (1992-07-01), Walowit et al.
patent: 5134495 (1992-07-01), Frazier et al.
patent: 5142537 (1992-08-01), Kutner et al.
patent: 5157491 (1992-10-01), Kassatly
patent: 5201013 (1993-04-01), Kumagai
patent: 5270728 (1993-12-01), Lund et al.
patent: 5293579 (1994-03-01), Stockholm
patent: 5301038 (1994-04-01), Todd
patent: 5337159 (1994-08-01), Iida et al.
patent: 5442462 (1995-08-01), Guissin
Mahesh, B., et al., Adaptive estimations for filtering noisy images, Optical Engineering, 29(5), pp. 488-494, 1990.
Gelb, A. (ed.), Applied optimal estimation, Technical Staff Analytical sciences corporation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1989, pp. 102-111.
Chin, R.T., et al., Quantitative evaluation of some edge preserving noise-smoothing techniques, Computer vision, graphics and image processing, 23, pp. 67-91, 1983.
Rabiner, L.R., et al., Theory and application of digital signal processing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, pp. 204-209.
Guissin, R., Adaptive dynamic range compression for FLIR imagery, SPIE--6th meeting in Israel on optical engineering, vol. 1038, pp. 299-306, 1988.
Pal, S.K., et al., Fuzzy mathematical approach to pattern recognition, Halsted Press, John Wiley & Sons, NY, USA, 1986.
Papoulis, A., Probability, random variables and stochastic processes, McGraw-Hill, Kogakusha Ltd., 1965, pp. 418-425.
Nahi, N.E., Role of recursive estimation in image enhancement, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jul. 1972, pp. 872-877.
Digital Compression and Coding of Continuous Tone Still Images, ISO/IEC International Standard 10918, pp. 336-343.
Draft Revised Recommendation H.261--Video Codec for Audio-Visual Services at p.times.64 kbit/s, submitted to the Xth CCITT Plenary Assembly, COM XV-R 95-E, May, 1992.
Fujiwara, H., et al., An All ASIC Implementation of a Low Bit Rate Video Codec, IEEE trans. On Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 123-124.
Nagao, M., et al., Edge preserving smoothing, Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 1974, v. 9, pp. 394-407.
Kurono, T., et al., Image processing on photon-counting imaging, SPIE, 1985, vol. 575, pp. 225-231.
Hanaizumi, H., et al., A nonlinear and adaptive algorithm for noise reduction in scanner signals, Proceedings of the 1984 International Symposium on Noise and Clutter Rejection in. . .
Astola, J., et al., Transaction Briefs: Linear median hybrid filters, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, vol. 36, No. 11, Nov. 1989, pp. 1430-1438.
Habibi, A., Two-dimensional bayesian estimate of images, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 60, No. 7, Jul. 1972, pp. 878-883.
Lloyd, R.O., et al., Image transform modeled on visual processing mechanisms of the brain, IEEE Conf. on Electronic Image Processing, 1982.
Lubin, J.,
D.V.P. Technologies Ltd.
Rogers Scott
LandOfFree
Apparatus and methods for smoothing images does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Apparatus and methods for smoothing images, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Apparatus and methods for smoothing images will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-42261