Chemical apparatus and process disinfecting – deodorizing – preser – Control element responsive to a sensed operating condition
Reexamination Certificate
2006-05-16
2006-05-16
Warden, Jill (Department: 1743)
Chemical apparatus and process disinfecting, deodorizing, preser
Control element responsive to a sensed operating condition
C422S091000, C422S105000, C604S327000, C604S317000, C206S438000, C210S348000, C210S464000
Reexamination Certificate
active
07045098
ABSTRACT:
Urine samples are made free of potentially interfering substances, such as alkaloids or pharmaceuticals, by contacting the urine sample with an amount of a chemical oxidizing agent in a disposable oxidation bag, while retaining the physical indicia characteristic of urine to allow the sample to be further tested.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3771964 (1973-11-01), Fader
patent: 3966764 (1976-06-01), Goldstein et al.
patent: 4038031 (1977-07-01), Lam
patent: 4242446 (1980-12-01), Madappally et al.
patent: 4270923 (1981-06-01), Kondo et al.
patent: 4536478 (1985-08-01), Sokoloff et al.
patent: 4606736 (1986-08-01), Van De Weghe
patent: 4661100 (1987-04-01), Rechsteiner
patent: 4710532 (1987-12-01), Hull et al.
patent: 4828743 (1989-05-01), Rhafield et al.
patent: 4877744 (1989-10-01), Chang
patent: 4955879 (1990-09-01), Mervine
patent: 4979402 (1990-12-01), Ryan et al.
patent: 5036014 (1991-07-01), ElSohly et al.
patent: 5212097 (1993-05-01), Kamahori et al.
patent: 5350855 (1994-09-01), Daniloff et al.
patent: 5380649 (1995-01-01), Berry et al.
patent: 5384246 (1995-01-01), Berry et al.
patent: 5384247 (1995-01-01), Berry et al.
patent: 5403749 (1995-04-01), Khartchenko et al.
patent: 5409814 (1995-04-01), Berry et al.
patent: 5413911 (1995-05-01), Adamczyk et al.
patent: 5436133 (1995-07-01), Fujita et al.
patent: 5464775 (1995-11-01), Smith
patent: 5494527 (1996-02-01), Ludwig et al.
patent: 5501958 (1996-03-01), Berry et al.
patent: 5516700 (1996-05-01), Smith et al.
patent: 5759860 (1998-06-01), Smith et al.
patent: 5861269 (1999-01-01), Visor et al.
patent: 5925570 (1999-07-01), Nishidate et al.
patent: 5955370 (1999-09-01), Kell
patent: 5961501 (1999-10-01), Cassidy et al.
patent: 6054303 (2000-04-01), Davalian et al.
patent: 6068971 (2000-05-01), Berry et al.
patent: 6162647 (2000-12-01), Stephens
patent: 6190873 (2001-02-01), Davalian et al.
patent: 6491673 (2002-12-01), Palumbo et al.
patent: WO 90/12113 (1990-10-01), None
S. Kaye, “A rapid screening blood alcohol analysis for the local pathologist”,American Jr. Forensic Medicine and Pathology, vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 205-208, Sep. 1980.
S. Mikkelsen et al., “Adulterants Causing False Negatives in Illicit Drug Testing”,Clin. Chem., vol. 343, No. 11, pp. 2333-2336, 1988 (no month).
A. Warner, “Interference of Common Household Chemical in Immunoassay Methods for Drugs of Abuse”,Clin. Chem., vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 648-651, 1989 (no month).
J. Cody et al. “Impact of Adulterants on RIA Analysis of Urine for Drugs of Abuse”,Jr. Anal. Toxicol., vol. 13, pp. 277-284, 1989 (no month).
P. Nebinger et al., “Interference in Immunological Urine Tests for Drugs of Abuse by Adulterants”,LRA, vol. 3, pp. 237-239, 1991 (no month).
R. Schwarzhoff, “The Effects of Adulterating Agents on FPIA Analysis of Urine for Drugs of Abuse”,Jr. Anal. Toxicology, vol. 17, pp. 14-17, Feb. 1993.
D. Armbruster et al., “Cloned Enzyme Donor Immunoassay (CEDIA) for Drugs-of-Abuse Screening”,Clin. Chem., vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 92-98, 1995.
F. Urry, et al. “Nitrite Adulteration of Workplace Urine Drug-Testing Specimens 1. Sources and Associated Concentrations of Nitrite in Urine and Distinction Between Natural Sources and Adulteration”,Jr. of Anal. Toxicology, vol. 22, pp. 89-95, 1998 (no month).
“Guidance for Reporting Specimen Validity Test Results”,NCLP Program Document #35, Dept. of Health and Human Services, [Internet] http://workplac.samhsa.gov/ResourceCenter/DT/NLCP/PD35.html, pp. 1-4, Sep. 28, 1998.
E. King, “Performance of AdultaCheck 4 Test Strips for the Detection of Adulteration at the Point of Collection of Urine Specimens used for Drugs-of-Abuse Testing”, Letter,Jr. of Anal. Toxicology, vol. 23, p. 72, Jan.-Feb. 1999.
A. Wu et al., Adulteration of Urine by “Urine Luck”,Clin. Chem., vol. 45, No. 7, pp. 1051-1057, 1999 (no month).
M. Blunt, Secretary of State, Missouri, “Rules of Department of Health, Division 25-Division of Administration, Chapter 30-Determination of Blood Alcohol by Blood, Breaths, Saliva and Urine Analysis, and Determination for the Presence of Drugs in Blood and Urine”, Code of State Regulations, (19 CSR 25-30.070), p. 13, Nov. 1988.
M. Blunt, Secretary of State, Missouri, “Rules of Department of Health, Division 25-Division of Administration, Chapter 30-Determination of Blood Alcohol by Blood, Breath, Saliva and Urine Analysis; and Determination for the Presence of Drugs in Blood and Urine”, Code of State Regulations, (19 CSR 25-30.011, 30.021, 30.031, 30.041, 30.050, 30.051,30.060,30.070, 3.080), pp. 1-27, Sep. 30, 2001.
Cole Monique T.
McDonald Hopkins Co. LPA
Warden Jill
LandOfFree
Apparatus and method for removing interfering substances... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Apparatus and method for removing interfering substances..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Apparatus and method for removing interfering substances... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3561114