Apparatus and method for predicting clear air turbulence

Measuring and testing – Fluid flow direction – Using a fluid actuated alignment device

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Reexamination Certificate

active

06237405

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to an aircraft flight management system, and an aircraft flight safety system. An apparatus incorporating a passive detector is used for mapping temperature, and for predicting clear air turbulence conditions ahead of the aircraft.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Clear air turbulence (CAT) is a major safety concern for large commercial aircraft. CAT is a weather phenomenon that is associated with vertical wind shear and stable layers in the atmosphere. CAT results in a rapidly changing airflow over the lift surfaces of the aircraft. Should the forward velocity of the air over the lift surfaces suddenly decrease, the lift will decrease. In this situation, the aircraft may experience a forced descent due to the down flowing air mass and also by an apparent loss in forward air speed. It is thus desirable that an onboard weather system be capable of providing an advanced warning of such wind conditions.
Since the conditions that result in clear air turbulence are not visually apparent nor are they generally detectable by active sensors such as radar, there have been a number of attempts to detect wind shear and clear air turbulence conditions by passive detectors. In particular, attempts have been made to sense air temperature gradients, which are associated with air turbulence, by detecting the radiation emanating from the atmosphere ahead of the aircraft in the infrared and microwave spectral regions. The intensity of the detected radiation varies with the atmospheric temperatures along the line of sight of the detector. Typically these passive systems use a radiometer to measure the thermal radiation from one of the atmospheric gases such as carbon dioxide (CO
2
), oxygen (O
2
) or water vapor (H
2
O) to determine changes in the spatial temperature profile in front of the aircraft. Examples of such approaches based on the infrared emission of CO
2
are provided in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,475,963, 3,735,136, 3,780,293, 3,935,460, 4,266,130, 4,427,306, 4,937,447, 4,965,572, 4,965,573, 5,105,191, 5,276,326 and 5,285,070. Other approaches determine atmospheric temperature by measuring the microwave emission from O
2
as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,359,557, 3,380,055, 4,346,595, and 5,117,689. Systems for measuring atmospheric temperature based on infrared emission from H
2
O are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,266,130 and in the paper by Kuhn et al, “Clear Air Turbulence: Detection by Infrared Observations of Water Vapor” in
Science,
Vol. 196, p.1099, (1977). In addition, there have been several papers written describing these types of passive infrared systems including: S. M. Norman and N. H. Macoy, “Remote Detection of Clear Air Turbulence by Means of an Airborne Infrared System” AJAA Paper No. 65-459 presented at the AIAA Second Annual Meeting, San Francisco, Calif., Jul. 26-29, 1965; and R. W. Astheimer, “The Remote Detection of Clear Air Turbulence by Infrared Radiation” in
Applied Optics
Vol. 9, No. 8, p.1789 (1970).
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,346,595, Gary describes a microwave radiometer for determining air temperatures in the atmosphere at ranges of about 3 km from the aircraft for the purpose of detecting the height of the tropopause and the presence of temperature inversions. He teaches that by flying the aircraft above or below the tropopause or temperature inversion layer, it is possible to avoid CAT. Since the effective range of the microwave radiometer is relatively short, the system doesn't provide sufficient warning time for the aircraft to avoid the CAT condition. The present invention has detection ranges on the order of 100 km which will allow time for the aircraft to change altitude to avoid CAT.
A number of the above systems were not successful or were only partially successful because they were based solely on the measurement of atmospheric temperature in order to predict the presence of turbulence. A more reliable indication of atmospheric turbulence can be realized by determining the Richardson number, Ri. The use of the Richardson number to determine the stability of the atmosphere is well known in meteorology (see, for example, D. Djuric,
Weather Analysis,
Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1994, p. 64). In the present invention, the Richardson number is used to indicate the probability of CAT. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,117,689, Gary discussed the correlation of the reciprocal of the Richardson number with the occurrence of CAT conditions.
The Richardson number contains two components: (1) the vertical lapse rate of potential temperature and (2) the wind shear which is related to the horizontal temperature gradient. A number of the prior art discussions measure the vertical temperature lapse rate. Gary used the inertial navigation system (INS) to measure the East-West and North-South components of the wind to calculate the wind shear along with a microwave radiometer to measure the air temperature vertical lapse rate. This information is then used to calculate the Richardson number or its reciprocal. The deficiency of the system described in this patent (U.S. Pat. No. 5,117,689) is that it determines the Richardson number at relatively close ranges (less than 3 km) and therefore does not provide advance warning of the CAT condition and that it measures the wind shear only at the aircraft.
Previous approaches for the determination of the range and probability of CAT can be summarized as follows:
U.S. Pat. No. 5,276,326 to Philpott determines turbulence as a function of temperature vs. range through the analysis of infrared radiometer signals at two or more discrete wavelengths. The temperature associated with a given range as a function of wavelength is then derived through a matrix inversion process. This transition is difficult and requires noise and error free input data to yield valid results. The present invention overcomes this difficulty by using only one wavelength. Gary overcomes the multiple wavelength difficulty in U.S. Pat. No. 4,346,595 by measuring effective temperature and range at a single wavelength, however no attempt is made to determine the probability of clear air turbulence using the Richardson number. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,117,689, Gary teaches the significance of the Richardson number in CAT prediction but does not suggest a method to derive Ri directly from radiometric measurements of horizontal and vertical temperature lapse rates obtained by combining azimuth and elevation scanning with the aircraft motion to produce a temperature map.
Since the early 60's several theoretical studies and field experiments have established a link between CAT and meso- and synoptic-scale dynamics. These scales range from 10's of km to 1000 km. The systems include jet streams in association with upper level frontogenesis, gravity waves, mountain waves and Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability (KHI).
Both theoretical studies and laboratory experiments have established the fundamental importance of the Richardson number to the onset of atmospheric turbulence. The Richardson number is defined as
Ri
=
(
g
θ
)



(

θ

z
)
&LeftBracketingBar;

V

z
&RightBracketingBar;
2
(
1
)
where
θ
=
T

{
1000
p
}
R
C
p
(
2
)
and where &thgr; is the potential temperature, ∂&thgr;/∂z is the vertical gradient of the potential temperature (defined as the lapse rate), ∂V/∂z is the vertical wind shear, g is acceleration due to gravity, T is temperature in Kelvin, p is atmospheric pressure in millibars, R is the universal gas constant and C
p
is the specific heat of air at constant pressure. The studies by W. T. Roach (“On the influence of synoptic development on the production of high level turbulence,”
Quart. J. R. Met. Soc.,
(1970) 96, 413), J. L. Keller (“Clear Air Turbulence as a Response to Meso- and Synoptic-Scale Dynamic Processes,”
Monthly Weather Review,
(1990) 118, 2228), both incorporated by reference herein, and others have concluded that although CAT occurs at unresolvable subgrid scales, the energy dissipatio

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Apparatus and method for predicting clear air turbulence does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Apparatus and method for predicting clear air turbulence, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Apparatus and method for predicting clear air turbulence will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2533156

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.