Electricity: measuring and testing – Particle precession resonance – Spectrometer components
Reexamination Certificate
2001-11-26
2004-03-30
Arana, Louis (Department: 2859)
Electricity: measuring and testing
Particle precession resonance
Spectrometer components
C324S322000, C600S421000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06714012
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to nuclear magnetic resonance (“NMR”) imaging and, more particularly, to methods and apparatus for imaging the peripheral vasculature.
Initially, NMR imaging systems utilized receiver coils which surrounded the entire sample (for example a human patient) that was to be imaged. These remote coils had the advantage that the sensitivity was, to a first approximation, substantially constant over the entire region being imaged. While this uniformity in sensitivity is not strictly characteristic of such remote coils, the sensitivity is substantially constant to a sufficient degree that most reconstruction techniques assume a constant coil sensitivity. Because of their large size the remote coils suffer from a relative insensitivity to individual spins.
For certain applications, a surface coil is preferable to a remote coil. Surface coils can be made much smaller in geometry than remote coils and for medical diagnostic use can be applied near, on, or inside the body of a patient. This is especially important where attention is being directed to imaging a small region within the patient, rather than an entire anatomical cross section. The use of a surface coil also reduces the noise contribution from electrical losses in the body, with respect to a corresponding remote coil, while maximizing the desired signal. NMR imaging systems thus typically use a small surface coil for localized high-resolution imaging.
A disadvantage of the surface coil, however, is its limited field of view. A single surface coil can only effectively image that region of the sample having lateral dimensions comparable to the surface coil diameter. Therefore, the surface coil necessarily restricts the field of view and inevitably leads to a tradeoff between resolution and field of view. The size of the surface coil is constrained by the intrinsic signal to noise ratio of the coil. Generally, larger coils induce greater patient sample losses and therefore have a larger noise component, while smaller coils have lower noise but in turn restrict the field of view to a smaller region.
One technique for extending the field-of-view limitation of a single surface coil is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,825,162 to Roemer et al. Roemer et al. describes a set of surface coils arrayed with overlapping fields of view. Each of the surface coils is positioned so as to have substantially no interaction with all adjacent surface coils. A different NMR response signal is received at each different one of the surface coils from an associated portion of the sample enclosed within an imaging volume defined by the array. Each different NMR response signal is used to construct a different one of a like plurality of NMR images of the sample, with the plurality of different images then being combined to produce a single composite NMR image. Roemer et al. describes a four-coil array for imaging the human spine.
While an increased number of surface coils may be used to increase field view NMR system scanners typically have a limited number of preamplifier inputs. The number of preamplifier inputs is therefore a design limitation in the design of phased array surface coils. A disadvantage of known phased array surface coils, therefore, is that the surface coil array may include only as many coils as can be directly connected to the preamplifiers of the system scanner.
One technique for constructing images of areas of greater size from the limited field of view of known surface coil combinations is to move the surface coils after successive scans. This technique, however, requires excessive scan room intervention. That is, after each scan, a technician enters the scan room to physically re-position the coils. This may increase examination time and increase the likelihood of a patient rejecting the procedure.
It would be desirable to obtain increased field of view without scan room intervention.
It would also be desirable to have an improved phased array surface coil for providing a large field of view. It is further desirable to utilize a greater number of surface coils in the array.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In one presently preferred embodiment, the invention provides an apparatus for enabling a patient to be positioned optimally for a scanning procedure during which images are to be obtained of a vasculature of the patient. The apparatus includes a lumbar support, a tray, and a leg support. The lumbar support supports a renal region of the patient so that a renal portion of the vasculature is positioned predominately in a single plane. The tray supports a pelvic region and a femoral region of the patient so that a pelvic portion and a femoral portion of the vasculature are positioned substantially coplanar with each other and with the renal portion of the vasculature. The leg support supports a lower leg region and a feet region of the patient so that a lower leg portion and a feet portion of the ,vasculature are positioned substantially coplanar with each other and with the pelvic and femoral portions of the vasculature. The substantial coplanar alignment of the portions of the vasculature enables the images thereof to be obtained with a smaller field of view and thus at least one of greater resolution and reduced scanning time.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4718424 (1988-01-01), Nishimura
patent: 4721913 (1988-01-01), Hyde et al.
patent: 4727328 (1988-02-01), Carper et al.
patent: 4825162 (1989-04-01), Roemer et al.
patent: 4975644 (1990-12-01), Fox
patent: 5034694 (1991-07-01), Sattin et al.
patent: 5132621 (1992-07-01), Kang et al.
patent: 5167232 (1992-12-01), Parker et al.
patent: 5168230 (1992-12-01), Hashoian et al.
patent: 5196796 (1993-03-01), Misic et al.
patent: 5216367 (1993-06-01), Mori
patent: 5258717 (1993-11-01), Misic et al.
patent: 5363845 (1994-11-01), Chowdbury et al.
patent: 5417213 (1995-05-01), Prince
patent: 5430378 (1995-07-01), Jones
patent: 5432449 (1995-07-01), Ferut et al.
patent: 5471142 (1995-11-01), Wang
patent: 5477146 (1995-12-01), Jones
patent: 5517120 (1996-05-01), Misic et al.
patent: 5521506 (1996-05-01), Misic et al.
patent: 5548218 (1996-08-01), Lu
patent: 5553619 (1996-09-01), Prince
patent: 5579767 (1996-12-01), Prince
patent: 5590654 (1997-01-01), Prince
patent: 5594337 (1997-01-01), Boskamp
patent: 5610520 (1997-03-01), Misic et al.
patent: 5666055 (1997-09-01), Jones et al.
patent: 5924987 (1999-07-01), Meaney et al.
patent: 197 09 244 (1998-06-01), None
patent: 390 476 (1990-10-01), None
patent: 758 091 (1997-02-01), None
patent: 803 736 (1997-10-01), None
Roemer, et al., The NMR Phased Array, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 16, pp. 192-255, (1990).
Medical Advances, Peripheral Vascular Coil, promotional brochure (Apr. 1997).
Kojima, K. Y., et al., “Lower Extremities: MR Angiography with a Unilateral Telescopic Phased-Array Coil,” Radiology, vol. 196: pp. 871-875 (1995).
Jones, R. W., et al., “Minimization of Noise Contributions in Multiple Coils: An Overview of Theories with Recommended Improvements,” SMRM, p. 369 (1992).
Hyde, J. S., et al., “Quadrature Detection Surface Coil,” MRM 4, pp. 179-184 (1987).
Wang, J., “A Novel Method to Reduce the Signal Coupling of Surface Coils for MRI,” ISMRM, vol. 3, p. 1434 (1996).
Baum, R. A., et al., “Multicenter Trial to Evaluate Vascular Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Lower Extremity,” JAMA, vol. 274, No. 11, pp. 875-880 (1995).
Medical Advances, The Whole Picture: The New Medical Advances Peripheral Vascular Coil, promotional brochure.
Lang, E. K., “A Survey of the Complications of Percutaneous Retrograde Arteriography,” Seldinger Technic, Radiology, 81: pp. 257-263 (1963).
Hessel, S. J., et al., “Complications of Angiography,” Radiology, 138: pp. 273-281 (1981).
Adams Bradley J.
Augustine Lisa A.
Bell, Jr. Robert S.
Belt Kenneth W.
Lewandowski Stanley R.
Arana Louis
Bradley Gregory L.
Medrad Inc.
Stevenson James R.
LandOfFree
Apparatus and method for positioning a patient to obtain... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Apparatus and method for positioning a patient to obtain..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Apparatus and method for positioning a patient to obtain... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3265979