Surgery – Instruments – Sutureless closure
Reexamination Certificate
2000-04-10
2002-10-29
Worrell, Danny (Department: 3765)
Surgery
Instruments
Sutureless closure
C606S215000, C606S192000, C606S191000, C604S237000, C604S167020, C128S897000, C128S850000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06471714
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is generally directed to an apparatus and method for facilitating a minimally invasive surgical procedure. More specifically, the subject apparatus and method is directed to facilitating manuary access to a sufflated body cavity during a hand-assisted laparascopic or other surgical procedure.
Minimally invasive surgical procedures such as laparascopic surgery have gained wide acceptance in various medical fields over traditional, filly invasive procedures for somewhat readily apparent reasons. Not only does the minimal invasiveness of such procedures significantly reduce the pain and stress to which a patient is otherwise subjected, they measurably reduce both the severity and duration of the recuperative period following surgery. The resulting benefits both in terms of cosmetic results and cost savings—are often quite considerable. Moreover, because they permit the required surgical manipulations to be carried out with the naturally enclosed biophysical environment at the surgery site kept substantially intact, such procedures minimize considerably the patient's exposure to potentially infectious or toxic organisms and contaminants. This, in turn, substantially minimizes the patient's risk of suffering medical complications.
In a typical laparoscopic surgical procedure, access to the surgery site—the abdominal or other internal body cavity, for instance—is gained through one or more fenestrations formed by puncturing the skin and the underlying muscle and soft tissue layers. A suitable miniature scope is introduced into the body cavity along with one or more laparoscopic instruments through shared or separate fenestrations. The surgeon may then perform the required surgical procedure by manipulating the laparoscopic instrument(s) and/or scope while acquiring visual feedback by viewing a video image of the site, as captured by the scope and reproduced on a display monitor.
As widely accepted and prevalent as they have become, however, such surgical procedures are not without their limitations. The surgeon's ability to adequately effect the precise cutting, suturing, and other very delicate surgical manipulations invariably required during laparoscopic procedures, for example, is highly dependent upon a set of critical factors including: the extensive experience and acute dexterity of the surgeon in performing the coordinated manipulations of the numerous laparoscopic instruments at hand; the degree of visibility attainable with the scope; and, the practical range of utility of the given instruments. A deficiency in any one of these factors severely obstructs the given procedure's successful completion and may, under certain circumstances, give rise to life threatening conditions. Hence, it not too infrequently becomes necessary to unexpectedly convert during the course of surgery to a fully invasive, open surgery.
Also, adhesions between the patient's internal organs at or around the surgery site tend to block or otherwise hinder the free manipulability of the laparoscopic instruments. It is difficult in such cases to maneuver an instrument between the adhering organs without potentially causing harm to either the organs or the instrument. Even where it is possible to adequately circumvent the adhering organs, much time and effort are unduly expended.
Of the more general limitations is the unavailability to the surgeon of any direct tactile sense of the surgery site. The instantaneous assessments that the surgeon must continually make as the surgical procedure progresses is consequently hindered by the lack of a key component of sensual feedback. The practicability of laparoscopic and like procedures is thus unduly restricted.
An approach developed to address these limitations is the so-called hand-assisted procedure, wherein the surgeon actually inserts a free hand into the given body cavity through a fenestration. With this free hand, the surgeon is able to supplement indirect, instrument-effected manipulations of organ and tissue parts with direct, hand-effected manipulations. Such direct hand manipulations often aid enormously in effecting difficult manipulations of organ and tissue that may otherwise be problematic using laparoscopic instrument maneuvers alone. With the free hand, the surgeon is also able to supplement the visual feedback acquired via the laparascopic scope with tactile sense feedback. Such supplemental feedback yields a vital source of additional information for either confirming or correcting visual assessments which, alone, may leave lingering ambiguity and general uncertainty.
While this manuary access to the surgery site greatly facilitates the conduct of minimally invasive surgical procedures, it too presents significant potential drawbacks and difficulties. First and most obvious, it necessarily compromises to some unavoidable extent the minimal invasiveness of the procedures. More notable than that, however, the sizable fenestration necessary to accommodate the manuary access threatens to compromise the body cavity's vital sufflation.
Consequently, there is a need for a method and apparatus by which a surgeon may safely and securely gain manuary access to an internal body cavity during a hand-assisted minimally invasive surgical procedure. There is a need for such method and apparatus that sufficiently establishes and maintains a substantially airtight seal across the fenestration which admits the surgeon's hand into the body cavity, yet does not unduly restrict or restrain the hand's movements. There is, furthermore, a need for such method and apparatus which is simple, convenient, and economical to utilize.
2. Prior Art
Devices are known in the art for facilitating manuary access to an internal body cavity during hand-assisted laparoscopic surgical procedures. For instance, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,853,395 issued to Crook et al., an assembly is disclosed for providing extracorporeal pneumoperitoneum. The assembly includes a multi-part support ring structure which is adhesively affixed to the patient's abdominal surface surrounding the given fenestration; a collar-like wound protector which is inserted to line the exposed edges of the fenestration; and a flexible sleeve member about an open end of which a seal ring is attached. During use, the seal ring of the sleeve member is secured in sealed manner to the ring structure. The surgeon's hand, wearing a surgical glove, is passed to engage finger holes formed into an otherwise closed end of the sleeve member, then advanced first through the engaged seal ring and its supporting ring structure, and next through the wound protector, into the internal body cavity. The gas escaping through the fenestration is captured by the sleeve member, which is sealed and retained in place cooperatively by the seal ring and supporting ring structure.
While this assembly does enable manuary access to the internal body cavity, and even seeks to preserve pneumoperitoneum during that access, it nonetheless suffers from a number of very notable drawbacks which, in practice, diminish its utility. First, the assembly is quite substantial both in the number and complexity of its components. This not only further complicates matters for the surgeon already burdened by the numerous concerns relating to the surgical procedure at hand, it makes for a cumbersome structure that consumes an inordinate share of the precious area on the surface of the patient's abdomen—area necessary to adequately accommodate fenestrations for the passage of other instruments into the internal body cavity. Second, proper operation of the assembly hinges upon the support ring structure remaining adhesively affixed to the patient's abdominal skin surface throughout the surgical procedure which typically lasts hours on end. During the course of surgery, however, the cumulative effects of moisture, movements of the surgeon's hand, and other factors often erode the structure's adhesiveness to the point that it actu
Muromoto, Jr. Robert
Rosenberg , Klein & Lee
Worrell Danny
LandOfFree
Apparatus and method for manuary access to sufflated body... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Apparatus and method for manuary access to sufflated body..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Apparatus and method for manuary access to sufflated body... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2934200