Aeronautics and astronautics – Aircraft structure – Ice prevention
Reexamination Certificate
2001-07-10
2003-04-15
Eldred, J. Woodrow (Department: 3644)
Aeronautics and astronautics
Aircraft structure
Ice prevention
C244S13400A, C239S722000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06547187
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the field of aircraft deicing, and more particularly, the present invention relates to an apparatus and method for deicing. aircraft using forced air from a compact, lightweight compressor unit.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Some deicing systems and methods used for deicing snow and ice-covered aircraft surfaces use an apparatus that sprays large quantities of deicing fluids onto the aircraft surfaces. Typically, this has been accomplished by spraying a heated antifreeze fluid (e.g., a glycol and water mixture) onto the iced surfaces of the aircraft, together with a large quantity of compressed air. An example includes the system disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,244,168, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, where a nozzle mixes pressurized air and deicing fluid to provide a spray pattern for application to the aircraft to deice the aircraft.
Other systems separate the glycol and water mixture from the compressed air and include a separate nozzle for discharging compressed air by providing a forced air deicing system having a powerful compressed air source. Typically, these systems include a vehicle frame, such as the chassis of a truck, having a boom with one end mounted on the vehicle frame and a free end. An operator cab is positioned at the free end of the boom and a deicer air jet nozzle is connected at the free end of the boom, typically mounted on the operator cab for operator control.
Many of these systems use very powerful jet engine air start units. The air exits the nozzle at a temperature of 300 degrees F to 400 degrees F above ambient. As a result, some of the ice and snow is melted and can migrate into crevices on the aircraft. The aircraft acts as a heat sink because the large mass of the aircraft remains at subfreezing temperatures. Thus, sensitive sensors and critical trailing edge flaps may become frozen and ineffective.
Typically, this type of compressor is capable of 300 to 500 horsepower and provides 300 to 400 pounds per minute of compressed air. The units are very inefficient, producing unnecessary hot air and excessive noise. Additionally, these systems are very heavy and must be positioned near the vehicle frame, a long distance from the operator cab carrying an air jet nozzle. As a result, long tubes must extend from the vehicle frame along the boom to the operator cab where the nozzles are located. These long runs from the compressor can cause thermodynamic and pneumatic deficiencies.
Also, any system that injects fluid at high pressure into the air stream has a drawback because the fluid could act as a cutting medium and damage aircraft surfaces. Therefore, it is essential in some instances to keep a great distance from the aircraft to avoid damaging the aircraft with the high pressure fluid, thus making the forced air system ineffective.
Previous systems and methods for deicing aircraft have attempted to overcome many of the aforementioned problems. For example, Giroux, “Hot Air Blast System: An Alternative to Heated Glycol Deicing” (Jun. 12, 1997), which is incorporated herein by reference, discloses a system for removing accumulations of snow prior to deicing with heated glycol. The Giroux publication, however, does not teach or suggest a deicing system capable of using both hot air and limited quantities of deicing fluid. Moreover, Giroux does not teach or suggest using a compact, lightweight compressor unit and actually teaches away from using a turbocharger-based deicing system.
In addition, Allied Signal Aerospace, “Allied Signal's Augmented Forced-Air Deicing (AFAD)” (Oct. 22, 1996), which is incorporated herein by reference, discloses an Augmented Forced-Air Deicing system. The Allied Signal publication, however, does not teach or suggest using a compact, lightweight compressor unit. Moreover, the Allied Signal publication suggests a compressor unit mounted on a vehicle at the base of a deicing boom and actually teaches away from a compressor unit mounted proximate to an air jet nozzle.
Furthermore, Warnock, U.S. Pat. No. 4,423,980 (Jan. 3, 1984), which is incorporated herein by reference, discloses a truck-mounted apparatus for repairing asphalt. The Warnock patent, however, does not teach or suggest a system for deicing aircraft. More specifically, the Warnock patent does not suggest a deicing system having a compact, lightweight compressor unit mounted proximate to an air jet nozzle.
Peppard, U.S. Pat. No. 5,134,266 (Jul. 28, 1992), which is incorporated herein by reference, discloses a mobile deicing apparatus for melting accumulated ice from aircraft surfaces. The Peppard patent, however, does not teach or suggest a deicing system having a compact, light weight compressor unit mounted proximate to an air jet nozzle.
Moreover, Numbers et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,250,588 (Jun. 26, 2001), which is incorporated herein by reference, discloses a forced air deicing and washing system attached to the distal end of a boom. Numbers was filed after the priority date of this application. Numbers does not teach or suggest a deicing system having a compact, light weight compressor unit with a high power-to-weight ratio, as disclosed in the present invention.
Accordingly, there is a significant need for a system and method for deicing that: (1) effectively removes ice and snow from critical equipment surfaces; (2) with improved efficiency by placing a lightweight air source proximate to the air nozzle; (3) with a high power-to-weight ratio; (4) at lower cost; and (5) while reducing the amount of hazardous and costly deicing fluids used.
Recently, Assignee's U.S. Pat. No. 6,045,092, to which the present application claims priority, was the subject of litigation. Opponents of the '092 patent argued that its scope was limited to a deicer system having a compressor unit mounted directly on the boom in the location shown in FIG.
1
. Without prejudice to Assignee's rights, Assignee believes that the invention disclosed in the '092 patent is much broader than this narrow interpretation of the claims. Because of a concern that the claims of the '092 patent were unclear and might arguably be limited to a scope of protection that is less than that to which Assignee was entitled, Assignee disclaimed the claims of the '092 patent and filed the present application.
Although the '092 patent discloses, in a preferred embodiment, a deicing system having a compressor unit that can be mounted on a boom (see Col. 3, II. 39-42), the placement of the compressor unit is not limited to this location in Assignee's priority documents. Rather, the language of the '092 patent and priority documents expressly distinguish over prior systems having large compressors located on the vehicle frame (see col. 4, II. 13-18). As such, the '092 patent discloses a deicing system having a lightweight compressor unit located anywhere on the boom side of the bearing that attaches the boom to the vehicle frame. Numerous locations for the compressor unit on the boom side of the bearing, as well as other variations and modifications that fall within the scope of the '092 patent, will be apparent to persons of ordinary skill in the art. Thus, it is expressly intended that the present invention resolve any ambiguity regarding placement of the compressor and include these variations and modifications, provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a system and method for deicing aircraft using a compact, lightweight air source that is not limited to being mounted on the vehicle frame.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a system and method for deicing aircraft using a compact, lightweight air source located proximate to a deicer air jet nozzle.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide an apparatus and method for deicing aircraft that uses forced air discharge that is efficient and uses a com
Collier Shannon Scott PLLC
Eldred J. Woodrow
FMC Technologies Inc.
Rygiel Mark W.
LandOfFree
Apparatus and method for deicing aircraft using compact,... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Apparatus and method for deicing aircraft using compact,..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Apparatus and method for deicing aircraft using compact,... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3022145