Registers – Coded record sensors – Particular sensor structure
Reexamination Certificate
2002-09-20
2004-12-07
Le, Thien M. (Department: 2876)
Registers
Coded record sensors
Particular sensor structure
C235S2010FS, C369S124040
Reexamination Certificate
active
06827272
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates generally to scanners, and in particular, but not exclusively, to automatic gain adjustment during scanning.
BACKGROUND
Bar code scanners typically function by generating a thin beam of light and scanning the beam across a symbol to be read. The symbol typically comprises a plurality of alternating light (usually white) and dark (usually black) areas; the best-known symbols are bar codes, where the light and dark areas are formed by a white background with alternating black bars superimposed thereon. As the spot created by the projection of the beam onto the symbol travels across the symbol, it crosses the alternating light and dark areas and a portion of the light hitting the symbol is reflected back into the scanner. More light is reflected from the light areas than from the dark areas, so the optical energy reflected back into the scanner will consist of a signal containing a series of peaks corresponding to the light areas and valleys corresponding to the dark areas. Processing circuitry within the scanner then converts the received optical signal into an electrical signal and proceeds to decode the peaks and valleys in the signal, thus extracting the information contained in the symbol.
FIGS. 1A and 1B
illustrate a common problem that occurs when a scanner attempts to read a flat symbol. All scanners have a so-called “scan window” within which the symbol must be placed if the scanner is to correctly read it. In addition, scanners usually have a fixed focal length and depth of field, depending on the optics used in the scanner. Thus, not only must the symbol be within the scan window, but it also must be within a prescribed distance of the scanner to be read.
FIG. 1A
illustrates a typical scanner setup, with the scanner
100
positioned at the focal distance f from the label
102
containing a symbol to be read. When the scanning beam
104
is approximately in the central portion of the symbol
102
, it is incident on the symbol at a perpendicular angle; in this case, a substantial amount of the optical energy of the beam is reflected back to the scanner and a small portion is absorbed by the symbol. As the beam scans and nears the edges of the scan window, it emerges from the scanner at an angle &thgr;, meaning that the angle of incidence of the beam on the symbol is also &thgr;; thus, &thgr;
1
=&thgr;
2
as shown. If the angle of incidence on the symbol is &thgr;, then basic physics dictate that the angle of reflection from the symbol must also be &thgr;. Thus, of the total optical energy contained in the incident beam, a certain portion is absorbed, a certain portion is reflected back toward the scanner, and a certain portion
106
is reflected into free space. As the angle &thgr; increases, the proportion of the optical energy reflected back toward the scanner decreases, while the proportion
106
of the optical energy reflected into free space increases. As a result, the amount of optical power received at the scanner drops off significantly at the edges of the symbol, making it difficult to adequately scan, capture and decode the information contained near the edges of the symbol. The problem is particularly acute when the scanner must operate in very close quarters and must therefore be placed very close to the symbol. In this case, the focal distanced is substantially shorter than that shown in
FIG. 1A
, meaning that the angles &thgr; are substantially larger, and that the return power at the edges of the symbol are substantially smaller. Thus, in scanners having a short focal length and operating near the symbol it is particularly challenging to properly read the edges of the symbol.
FIG. 1B
illustrates the effect of the above phenomenon on the optical response of the scanner.
FIG. 1C
illustrates another phenomenon that affects the optical response of the scanner. In addition to the fact that less optical energy is reflected from the symbol toward the scanner at higher angles &thgr;, the optical response is also affected by the light-collection properties of the optical detector within the scanner. Specifically, the optical energy collected by an optical detector depends on the projected area of the detector in the direction from which the energy is collected. Thus, if a beam
110
is incident on a detector
112
at a normal angle (i.e., &thgr;=0 degrees), then the detector
112
collects the optical energy over the entire area A
0
. If instead a beam
114
is incident on the detector
112
at a non-zero angle &thgr;, then the detector only collects energy over the projected area A
&thgr;
, which is substantially smaller than the projected area A
0
. As the angle &thgr; increases, the area A
&thgr;
gets smaller, and thus the area over which the detector can collect optical energy decreases. This phenomenon factors into the optical response curve
108
shown in FIG.
1
B.
Automatic Gain Control (AGC) is an approach used in the prior art to compensate for varying distances between the symbol and the scanner. With existing AGC systems the gain of the optical detector is changed from scan to scan, depending on the distance between the scanner and the symbol. Once a gain value is selected for a particular scan, it stays constant at that value throughout the particular scan. Thus, when the symbol is near to the scanner the gain can be adjusted downward, whereas when the symbol is farther from the scanner, the gain can be adjusted upward. The shortcoming of this approach is that although the gain can be varied from scan to scan, only a single gain value can be employed throughout any given scan. In other words, there is no way of adjusting the gain during a scan. This approach therefore cannot be used to address the problem of compensating for reduced optical response at the edges of a scanned symbol. In addition, even if a standard AGC could be adapted to compensate for gain changes during a scan, they would be much too slow.
One way of dealing with the poor optical response near the symbol edges is discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,701,003 to Chisholm et al (“Chisholm”). The approach taken in Chisholm to improve optical response of the scanner at the edges of the scan window is to increase the optical power of the laser in the scanner near the edges of the scan window while reducing the power of the laser near the middle of the scan window. Because the angles of incidence and reflection of the scanning beam continue to be the same at the edges of the scan window, the proportion of optical energy reflected back to the scanner at the edges of the scan window continues to be the same. Since the power of the incident beam is higher, however, the optical power reflected back to the scanner is higher. The net effect of the Chisholm approach is that the optical response curve is “flattened,” so that the optical response is more nearly constant across the width of the scan window.
Despite the apparent elegance of the approach taken in Chisholm, it has several important disadvantages. First, increasing the power of the laser near the edges of the symbol has serious safety implications because the increased laser power can pose a danger to the eyes of the scanner operator or other bystanders, and when the beam nears the edge of the symbol more of the optical power is likely to be reflected into someone's eyes. Second, using the laser at a higher power output and continually cycling the laser between low and high power states will decrease the lifetime of the laser and the scanner, ultimately driving up costs to the end user. Finally, the higher power output of the laser means additional power consumption and additional heat dissipation problems. Power consumption and heat dissipation both can lead to additional expense in making and using the scanner, as well as inconvenience to the user who, in the case of a hand-held scanner, must carry the additional weigh of heat sinks, etc, used to dissipate the heat created by the additional power consumption of the laser.
Given the shortcomings in methods to improve scan
Blakely , Sokoloff, Taylor & Zafman LLP
Hess Daniel A.
Le Thien M.
Microscan Systems Inc.
LandOfFree
Apparatus and method for automatic gain control during scanning does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Apparatus and method for automatic gain control during scanning, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Apparatus and method for automatic gain control during scanning will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3333394