Electrical computers: arithmetic processing and calculating – Electrical digital calculating computer – Particular function performed
Reexamination Certificate
2000-04-05
2003-07-08
Ngo, Chuong Dinh (Department: 2124)
Electrical computers: arithmetic processing and calculating
Electrical digital calculating computer
Particular function performed
C708S322000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06591282
ABSTRACT:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
The present invention relates generally to a finite impulse response filter, and particularly to a DC-Insensitive finite impulse response filter.
BACKGROUND
FIG. 1
 illustrates, in block diagram form, a portion of a prior art Optical Partial Response Maximum Likelihood (PRML) Read Channel 
20
. Read Channel 
20
 includes Analog to Digital Converter (ADC) 
22
, Finite Impulse Response Filter (FIR) 
26
 and Viterbi Decoder 
30
. ADC 
22
 receives an RF signal on line 
21
, which it converts to a digital signal, the x(n) signal on line 
23
. FIR 
26
 filters the x(n) signal to generate the y(n) signal, which it couples to Viterbi Decoder 
30
.
Read Channel 
20
 functions as expected when the RF signal on line 
21
 is free from baseline wandering. As used herein, baseline wandering refers to low frequency disturbances of a radio frequency signal. Typically, prior to ADC 
22
 effort is made to remove baseline wandering from the RF signal using an Eight-to-Fourteen Modulator (EFM) (not illustrated); however, an EFM cannot eliminate the short-term, sample-to sample, effects of baseline wandering. Thus, the RF input to ADC 
22
, and its output, the x(n) signal, include time variant error attributable to baseline wandering. FIR 
26
 does not function as desired when the x(n) signal is subject to baseline wandering.
FIG. 2
 schematically illustrates FIR 
26
, a conventional Least Mean Square (LMS) FIR. FIR 
26
 includes N serially-coupled latches 
30
, 
32
 & 
34
, each with its output signal, an x(n−i) signal, (i is an integer from 1 to I) coupled to one of I Taps 
40
, 
42
 & 
44
. Each Tap i multiplies its input signal, x(n−i), by a coefficient signal, ki(n), to generate a tap output signal. Adder 
50
 sums the tap output signals to generate the FIR output signal, the y(n) signal. Error Calculator 
52
 determines the error of the y(n) signal, which it represents via the e(n) signal. Each of the N Coefficient Calculators 
60
, 
62
 & 
64
 uses the e(n) signal to update its associated coefficient signal, ki(n).
The timing diagram of 
FIG. 3
 illustrates the operation of prior art FIR 
26
 when its input signal, x(n) 
80
, is free from baseline wandering. The FIR output signal, y(n) 
82
, quickly settles into a pattern of switching between five ideal values. The error signal, e(n) 
84
, quickly converges to zero. The timing diagram of 
FIG. 4
 illustrates that the operation of prior art FIR 
26
 differs substantially when its input signal, x(n) 
81
, is subject to baseline wandering. The FIR output signal, y(n) 
83
, never settles into a pattern of switching between a limited set of ideal values. The error signal, e(n) 
85
, never converges to zero.
FIG. 5
 illustrates schematically prior art Coefficient Calculator 
59
 with which Coefficient Calculators 
60
, 
62
 & 
64
 are realized. Coefficient Calculator 
59
 implements a conventional Least Mean Square algorithm. The tap weight ki(n) for Tap i at time n is given by Expression (1).
ki
(
n
)=
ki
(
n
−1)+
mu
*del 
ki
(
n
−1) when 
n
>0
;=ki 
initial when 
n
=0;  (1)
where ki(n−1) is the immediately previous value of the tap weight for Tap i;
mu is loop gain;
del ki(n−1) is the increment in the value of the tap weight; and
ki initial is the initial value of ki(n).
The increment in the value of the tap weight is given by Expression (2).
del 
ki 
(
n
−1)=
d[y
(
n
)−
y
{circumflex over ( )}(
n
)]
2
/dki
(
n
);  (2)
where y{circumflex over ( )}(n) is the ideal value corresponding to y(n); and d[y(n)−y(n)]
2
/dki (n) expresses the derivative of [y(n)−{circumflex over ( )}(n)]
2 
over ki(n).
FIG. 6
 illustrates, in block diagram form, prior art Error Calculator 
52
, which calculates both the error signal, e(n), and the y{circumflex over ( )}(n) signal from the y(n) signal. Error Calculator 
52
 includes Quantizer 
110
 and Subtractor 
112
. Quantizer 
110
 takes its input, the y(n) signal, and determines the corresponding ideal value, y{circumflex over ( )}(n), using Relationship (3).
y
{circumflex over ( )}(
n
)=
q
*round(
y
(
n
)/
q
);  (3)
where q represents a quantization interval; and
“round” represents a rounding function.
Subtractor 
112
 determines the error of the output signal, y(n), by subtracting it from the corresponding ideal value. Thus, the error signal, e(n), is given by Expression (3).
e
(
n
)=
y
{circumflex over ( )}(
n
)−
y
(
n
).  (4)
Referring again to 
FIG. 1
, the FIR output signal, y(n),can be expressed as the sum of the i Tap outputs, as is done in Expression (5).
 
y
(
n
)=sum{
ki*x
(
n−i
)} for all 
i;
  (5)
where x(n−i) is the delayed input sample for Tap i.
Using Expressions (4) and (5) to substitute for y{circumflex over ( )}(n) and y(n) in Expression (2) yields Expression (6).
del 
ki
(
n
)=2
*e
(
n
)
x
(
n−i
)  (6)
Expression (6) shows that both e(n) and ki(n) are related to x(n−1), and if x(n−1) is contaminated with baseline wandering, then both e(n) and ki(n) will be contaminated as well. Thus, Expression (
6
) reveals that baseline wandering of the x(n) signal prevents both the error signal, e(n), and tap weight signals, ki(n), from converging. A need exists for a FIR capable of converging when its input signal is subject to baseline wandering.
SUMMARY
The Finite Impulse Response filter (FIR) of the present invention reduces the effect of baseline wandering of the input signal on convergence. The FIR includes an adder, a DC-Insensitive error calculator, a DC-Insensitive coefficient calculator, and a multiplier. The adder adds a first tap signal to a second tap signal to produce a FIR output signal. The DC-Insensitive error calculator calculates from the FIR output signal an error value that converges in the presence of baseline wandering. The DC-Insensitive error calculator represents the error value via an error signal. The DC-Insensitive coefficient calculator calculates a coefficient value based upon the error signal and an input signal. The DC-Insensitive coefficient calculator forces the coefficient value to converge to a steady state value while the first signal is subject to baseline wandering. The coefficient value is represented by a coefficient signal. The multiplier multiplies the first input signal by the coefficient signal to produce the first tap signal.
The method filtering of the present invention reduces the effect of baseline wandering of the input signal on convergence. The method begins by multiplying a first input signal subject to baseline wandering by a first coefficient signal representing a first coefficient value to produce a first tap signal. Next, the first tap signal is added to a second tap signal to produce a FIR output signal. The FIR output signal is filtered to produce a filtered FIR output signal that is substantially free from the effects of baseline wandering. The filtered FIR output signal is then compared to an ideal value to generate an error signal that represents an error value. The first input signal is filtered to produce a filtered first input signal that is substantially free from the effects of baseline wandering. Finally, a value for the first coefficient is determined using a Least Mean Square (LMS) relationship, the filtered first input signal and the error signal. The first coefficient value converges to a first steady state value while the first input signal is subject to baseline wandering. The first coefficient value is represented via a first coefficient signal.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4580275 (1986-04-01), Pirani et al.
patent: 5307375 (1994-04-01), Wu et al.
patent: 5465272 (1995-11-01), Smith
patent: 5528627 (1996-06-01), Yanagi et al.
patent: 5949819 (1999-09-01), Bjamason et al.
patent: 5983127 (1999-11-01), dePinto
patent: 5991339 (1999-11-01), Bazes et al.
patent: 6301298 (2001-10-01), Kuntz et al.
Raimon Jane et al., Adaptive Baseline Wander Removal in the ECG; Compar
Do Chat C.
Ngo Chuong Dinh
Oak Technology, Inc.
Pennie & Edmonds LLP
LandOfFree
Apparatus and method for a DC-Insensitive FIR filter for... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Apparatus and method for a DC-Insensitive FIR filter for..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Apparatus and method for a DC-Insensitive FIR filter for... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3086579