Antigenized antibody vaccine for foot-and-mouth disease

Organic compounds -- part of the class 532-570 series – Organic compounds – Carbohydrates or derivatives

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C536S023530, C536S023720, C514S04400A

Reexamination Certificate

active

06774225

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
1) Field of Invention
The present invention relates to a vaccine which is capable of eliciting immunicity against foot-and-mouth disease.
2) Description of Prior Art
Antibodies are proteins produced by the body's immune system in response to foreign elements known as antigens, which invade the body. Vaccine can elicit an immune response, which subsequently protects the host from infection by the disease-causing agents (antigens).
Usually, the vaccine consists of the organism or parts of the thereof that causes the disease. The organism or some parts of it, which makes up the vaccine is often killed or attenuated, so that the disease-causing organism will lose some or all of its ability to cause disease in the host. In most cases, bacteria, and to some extent viruses, slowly lose their ability to colonize living things as they are cultured outside the body.
There are a number of approaches to producing vaccines, and the major kinds of vaccines include viral vaccines, biopharmaceutical vaccines, multiple antigen-peptide vaccines and polyprotein vaccines.
Foot-and-Mouth Disease, also known as FMD hereinafter, is a highly contagious, severely debilitating disease that infects all cloven-hoofed animals. It is endemic in many developing countries worldwide. In particular, swine in Asian have often been affected by FMD. FMD reduces livestock productivity, incurs high vaccination costs, and restricts the international trade of livestock and livestock products. FMD is a viral infectious disease and the foot-and-mouth disease virus, also known as FMDV hereinafter, is a small animal virus having a single stranded positive sense RNA genome of about 8,000 nucleotides.
Two major types of vaccines have been produced against FMD. They are conventional vaccines and synthetic peptide vaccines. Conventional vaccines against FMDV use either inactivated FMD virus or a live attenuated FMD virus. The conventional vaccine approach, although generally effective, have several undesirable drawbacks associated with it.
Firstly, it is cost inefficient. This type of vaccine is made from large amounts of live, infectious virus. Maintaining and processing a large quantity of infectious virus is expensive, labor intensive and space inefficient.
Second and most importantly, these vaccines are potentially dangerous. Most of the outbreaks of FMD in recent years have been caused either by the escape of virus from vaccine production units or the use of incompletely inactivated or insufficiently attenuated virus. For example, during the 1980's, a number of outbreaks occurred in European countries including Italy, United Kingdom, France and in Taiwan in 1996. As the causative viruses of outbreaks were often found to be closely related or even identical to the strains that were used in Europe for manufacturing, it is possible that the primary outbreaks were caused by inadequately inactivated vaccines or by virus that escaped from vaccine production plants.
Another problem associated with producing conventional vaccine is that they are thermolabile. Conventional FMD vaccines are relatively unstable when exposed to elevated temperatures and they have to be stored at low temperatures. Constantly maintaining the required low temperatures is often not easily achievable, especially in tropical countries.
An addition potential problem in a virus culturing procedure of the conventional vaccine production vaccine production process is the use of fetal bovine serum virus culturing. It is possible that diseases can be introduced from the fetal bovine serum and affect the vaccinated animals.
Yet another major disadvantage of using conventional FMD vaccines is that most vaccines produced using the conventional method are relatively crude preparations of inactivated tissue culture grown virus. This tissue cultural mix may cause serious side effects such as allergic responses and abortions in susceptible stock.
There are newer forms of FMDV vaccines that do not use inactivated virus. They are synthetic peptide vaccines and recombinant protein vaccines. The identification of the immuno-dominant sites on viral protein 1 (VP1) of FMDV provided new ideas for designing synthetic peptide and recombinant protein FMD vaccines. Compared to conventional vaccines, these two types of vaccines are both safe in production and application. They are also very easy to handle, store, transport and can be designed to meet specific requirements.
The study of synthetic FMDV peptide vaccine was started by polymerizing the 141 a.a.-160 a.a. peptide from VP1 with either glutaraldehyde or air-oxidized after a cysteine residue was added at each terminus. It was found that uncoupled peptides could be made immunogenic. In 1987, Francis and his colleagues reported that the presence of C-terminal cysteines with a free thiol group largely enhanced the immunogenicity of free 141-160 a.a. peptide. Similar results were also obtained when multiple cysteine residues were added. It was suggested that the presence of a free thiol cysteine residue would allow the formation of peptide dimers leading to a more ordered secondary structure causing immune complex formation in vivo (Francis, 1995). According to this idea, immunogenicity of tandem repeats (Cys 137-162(×2)) was compared to that of a single copy of Cys 137-163 peptide. It was found that tandem repeats of the FMDV peptide were generally more immunogenic than the single copy of disulphide dimers. The addition of a cysteine residue could result in the formation of disuphide tetramer structures which improved the immune response further.
The concept of multiple copies synthetic peptides was further tested by using Tam's multiple antigenic peptide (MAP) system (Tam 1988). This system allows solid phase synthesis of a peptide antigen onto a branching lysine backbone to produce several polylysine octamer constructs. This system where there are multiple copies of the peptide resulted in greatly enhanced response.
In order to apply multiple copies of the FMDV peptide, recombinant DNA technology has been applied by fusing small peptide sequences to the gene coding for larger proteins. These larger proteins of recombinant vaccine have a number of characteristics. The goal of linking the peptide to the carrier is to provide a completely uniform and defined structure for the presentation of the immunogens as compared with those prepared by chemical cross-linking (Francis, 1991). This approach was first investigated by fusing single or multiple copies of the FMDV immunogenic peptides to the N-terminus of a bacterial protein, beta-galactosidase (Broekhuijsen et al., 1986; Winther et al., 1986). Beta-galactosidase was chosen because it has been shown that antibodies can be elicited against the epitopes from VP1 that are located at the N-terminus, and it also contains several T cell epitopes (Krzych et al., 1982; Manca et al., 1985). The immunogenicity of this multiple copy FMDV peptide-beta-galactosidase recombinant protein is found to be similar to that obtained from using the lysine background system (Broekhuijen et al., 1987).
Multiple peptide presentation was then further developed using FMDV peptide sequence fused to the N-terminus of the hepatitis B virus core antigen (HBcAg) to produce HBc fusion particles. It was reported that this 27 nm hybrid protein particle was able to give full protection to guniea pigs with results that were close to that elicited by inactivated FMDV VP1 142 a.a.-160 a.a. peptide and could protect animals against challenge infections.
Although initially promising, the synthetic peptide approach and recombinant protein vaccine approach appear to have shortcomings. Among these are poor predictability of the tertiary structure and weak immnunogenicity. Peptides in solution exist in conformations that may not be always optimal for receptor binding (B-cell receptor and possibly T-cell receptor and major histocompatibility gene products) if specific conformation at the three-dimensional level is required for it to exhibit its intended functions.
In the case

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Antigenized antibody vaccine for foot-and-mouth disease does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Antigenized antibody vaccine for foot-and-mouth disease, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Antigenized antibody vaccine for foot-and-mouth disease will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3351792

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.