Communications: electrical – Condition responsive indicating system – Specific condition
Reexamination Certificate
2000-01-19
2002-03-05
Mullen, Thomas (Department: 2632)
Communications: electrical
Condition responsive indicating system
Specific condition
C188S111000, C280S033994
Reexamination Certificate
active
06353388
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to vehicles and, more particularly, to an are bounded vehicle system used to inhibit rotation of a vehicle wheel outside a predetermined spatial perimeter to mitigate the theft of vehicles or limit the travel thereof to within a specific boundary.
2. Description of the Related Art
It is sometimes desired to contain a vehicle within a predetermined spatial boundary or perimeter. In particular, retail stores are attempting to reduce the amount of lost vehicles such as shopping carts, which are either stolen or taken out of the normal bounds of the stores and not returned.
Accordingly, U.S. Pat. No. 5,194,844 to Zelda discloses a vehicle theft prevention system which inhibits the use of a shopping cart once it is moved outside a boundary. This patented system includes an electronic wire that extends around and defines a perimeter of normal operating space which is used by operators of a store's shopping carts. The electronic wire produces an electromagnetic field which is sensed by a sensor located adjacent one wheel of the shopping cart. The sensor sends a signal to a motor which moves a brake pad against the wheel of the shopping cart. Two limit switches are used to stop the motor when the motor has either moved the brake pad into or out of engagement with the wheel of the shopping cart.
One disadvantage of the above system is that it is relatively expensive because the motor must be large and two limit switches are needed. Another disadvantage of the above system is that an asymmetric time-variant wave form is used for the electromagnetic field which is undesired.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is, therefore, one object of the present invention to provide an anti-theft vehicle system for vehicles.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an anti-theft vehicle system for vehicles such as shopping carts, toys, wheeled inventory, and industrial forklifts.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide an anti-theft vehicle system for a vehicle wheel to prevent an operator from moving the vehicle outside a predetermined spatial perimeter.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide an anti-theft vehicle system for a shopping cart wheel which is inexpensive and effective at making it difficult for an operator to move the shopping cart out of a predetermined operating area of a retail store.
To achieve the foregoing objects, the present invention is an anti-theft vehicle system for a vehicle wheel having a rotational axis. The anti-theft vehicle system includes at least one inhibitor disposed within the vehicle wheel to selectively engage and disengage the vehicle wheel to resist and allow rotational movement of the vehicle wheel about its rotational axis. The anti-theft vehicle system also includes rotatable means disposed within the vehicle wheel and cooperating with the inhibitor for moving the inhibitor between an engaged position and a disengaged position with the vehicle wheel. The anti-theft vehicle system further includes a receiver operatively associated with the vehicle wheel to receive a predetermined signal to actuate the rotatable means to move the at least one inhibitor between the engaged position and disengaged position.
One advantage of the present invention is that an anti-theft vehicle system is provided for vehicles such as shopping carts, toys, wheeled inventory, and industrial forklifts. Another advantage of the present invention is that the anti-theft vehicle system provides a vehicle wheel which deters an operator from moving the vehicle outside a predetermined spatial perimeter. Yet another advantage of the present invention is that the anti-theft vehicle system provides a cost effective vehicle wheel to deter operators from taking shopping carts out of a retail store's shopping cart boundary by preventing the vehicle wheel from rotating. Still another advantage of the present invention is that the anti-theft vehicle system provides a one-piece brake, springs and component mounting area for the vehicle wheel. A further advantage of the present invention is that the anti-theft vehicle system is self-energizing in both directions. Yet a further advantage of the present invention is that the anti-theft vehicle system provides a linkage overrun for position lock of the vehicle wheel. Still a further advantage of the present invention is that the anti-theft vehicle system changes the angle of a thrust arm to maximize brake linkage efficiency.
Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be readily appreciated as the same becomes better understood after reading the subsequent description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings.
REFERENCES:
patent: 1928750 (1933-10-01), Apple et al.
patent: 1968584 (1934-07-01), Apple
patent: 2964140 (1960-12-01), Berezny
patent: 3029905 (1962-04-01), Nowak
patent: 3031037 (1962-04-01), Stollman
patent: 3031038 (1962-04-01), Chait
patent: 3117655 (1964-01-01), Skupas et al.
patent: 3157871 (1964-11-01), Umanoff
patent: 3495688 (1970-02-01), Isaacks
patent: 3590962 (1971-07-01), Parker et al.
patent: 3652103 (1972-03-01), Higgs
patent: 3717225 (1973-02-01), Rashbaum et al.
patent: 3809191 (1974-05-01), Woodward
patent: 3820623 (1974-06-01), Akashi et al.
patent: 4242668 (1980-12-01), Herzog
patent: 4338594 (1982-07-01), Holm
patent: 4424511 (1984-01-01), Alberts, Jr.
patent: 4472706 (1984-09-01), Hodge et al.
patent: 4577880 (1986-03-01), Bianco
patent: 4591175 (1986-05-01), Upton et al.
patent: 4609075 (1986-09-01), Snedeker
patent: 4683461 (1987-07-01), Torre
patent: 4772880 (1988-09-01), Goldstein et al.
patent: 4809824 (1989-03-01), Fargier et al.
patent: 4868544 (1989-09-01), Havens
patent: 4878050 (1989-10-01), Kelley
patent: 4908604 (1990-03-01), Jacob
patent: 4987406 (1991-01-01), Reid
patent: 4990890 (1991-02-01), Newby
patent: 5000297 (1991-03-01), Shaw et al.
patent: 5053768 (1991-10-01), Dix, Jr.
patent: 5194844 (1993-03-01), Zelda
patent: 5283550 (1994-02-01), MacIntyre
patent: 5315290 (1994-05-01), Moreno et al.
patent: 5349329 (1994-09-01), Smith
patent: 5357182 (1994-10-01), Wolfe et al.
patent: 5394962 (1995-03-01), Gray
patent: 5432412 (1995-07-01), Harris et al.
patent: 5465986 (1995-11-01), MacRae
patent: 5576691 (1996-11-01), Coakley et al.
patent: 5598144 (1997-01-01), Lace
patent: 5607030 (1997-03-01), Swift et al.
patent: 5821856 (1998-10-01), Lace
patent: 5831530 (1998-11-01), Lace et al.
patent: 37 00411 (1987-07-01), None
patent: 532472 (1993-03-01), None
patent: 2 137 388 (1984-10-01), None
patent: 2 266 643 (1993-11-01), None
patent: 15476 (1992-09-01), None
Durban Jack
Lace Jeffrey J.
Bliss McGlynn & Nolan, P.C.
Gatekeeper Systems, LLC.
Mullen Thomas
LandOfFree
Anti-theft vehicle system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Anti-theft vehicle system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Anti-theft vehicle system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2886112