Telecommunications – Transmitter and receiver at separate stations – With control signal
Reexamination Certificate
2000-09-26
2003-08-26
Vo, Nguyen (Department: 2685)
Telecommunications
Transmitter and receiver at separate stations
With control signal
C455S562100
Reexamination Certificate
active
06611675
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to wireless telecommunications equipment and systems and, more particularly, to fixed site or base station equipment that uses antenna diversity transmission techniques to mobile phones or stations, also referred to herein as user equipment (UE).
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
One modern wireless telecommunications system that is presently under development is commonly referred to as a third generation (3G) wideband code division/multiple access (WCDMA) system. It is proposed in the 3G-WCDMA system to use some type of closed loop, feedback mode transmitter diversity.
FIG. 1A
depicts a presently proposed downlink (base station (BS) to user equipment (UE)) transmitter structure
1
for supporting closed loop transmit diversity. In
FIG. 1
DPCH refers to dedicated control channel and CPICH refers to common pilot channel. The DPCH includes a (dedicated) pilot signal and data, which is channel coded and interleaved before being spread and scrambled. The DPCCH conveys the dedicated pilot and other dedicated control information. The spread complex valued signal is fed to two transmitter antenna branches (Ant
1
and Ant
2
), and weighted with antenna-specific weight factors w
1
and w
2
, respectively. The weight factors are complex valued signals. The weight factors (actually the corresponding phase adjustments for mode
1
) are determined by the UE
2
, and are signaled to the BS
1
through an uplink DPCCH. When operating in mode
2
both the phase and the amplitude is modified.
There are actually two feedback modes, which are uniquely identified by the mode specific antenna weight value set. The structure of the feedback signaling message (FSM) is shown in
FIG. 1B
, where it can be seen that the FSM has two parts. The first part of the FSM is FSM
ph
, which transmits the phase setting, while the second part is FSM
po
, which transmits the power setting.
FIG. 1C
is a table that summarizes the characteristics of the feedback mode, where N
FBD
is the number of feedback bits per slot, N
w
is the length of the feedback command in slots, update rate is the feedback command rate, N
po
is the number of power bits, and N
ph
is the number of phase bits per signaling word.
The UE
2
uses the common pilot channel CPICH to separately estimate the channels seen from each antenna (Ant
1
and Ant
2
). Once every slot the UE
2
chooses amongst the mode-specific transmit weight set an optimum weight which, when applied at the BS
1
, maximizes the received power at the UE
2
. The UE
2
then feeds back tot he BS
1
the FSM, which informs the BS
1
of which power/phase settings should be used. If N
po
is zero, then equal power is applied to both transmit antennas.
In the first feedback mode equal power is applied to Ant
1
and Ant
2
, and the UE
2
must then only determine the phase adjustment between Ant
1
and Ant
2
. This is done using channel estimates computed from the CPICH. The BS
2
averages the phase adjustments of two consecutive slots, implying that the possible transmit weights in the feedback mode
1
are exactly the QPSK constellation points
It can thus be appreciated that in the closed loop transmit diversity mode of operation the user equipment
2
determines an optimal phase shift for the BS transmission antennas (Ant
1
and Ant
2
) and transmits a (one bit) feedback (FB) command to the BS. The BS uses two successive one bit FB commands to determine transmission weights w
1
and w
2
for antennas Ant
1
and Ant
2
, respectively, when transmitting the DPCH to the UE. The weight for Ant
1
(w
1
) is always unity, while the weight for Ant
2
, w
2
, has values of e
1&phgr;
, where &phgr;∈{&pgr;/4, 3&pgr;/4,−&pgr;/4,−3&pgr;/4}.
In the proposed embodiment of
FIG. 1
the BS
1
uses orthogonal common pilot patterns for the CPICH channels of antennas
1
and
2
. These channels are common to all UEs
2
in the cell area, and are transmitted without UE-specific transmission weights. However, a UE
2
will typically wish to utilize CPICH channels in channel estimation due to the higher transmission power resulting in a more reliable channel estimation. In order to properly combine the channel estimates corresponding to CPICH
1
and CPICH
2
, the UE
2
must know the transmission weight w
2
that was utilized by the BS
1
. A more detailed description of the mode
1
closed loop transmit diversity can be found in the 3GPP specification TS25.214:“Physical layer procedures (FDD)”.
However, the feedback channel that is used to transmit the FSMs from the UE
2
to the BS
1
, which are employed by the BS
1
to steer the phase shift of antenna
2
, is not error free. As such, due to reception errors in the feedback channel the BS
1
may not always transmit the DPCH using the optimal phase shift determined by the UE
2
. Since the UE utilizes the common pilot channels in the channel estimation it must know the value of w
2
, i.e., the phase shift applied at ANT
2
. Without this knowledge the UE
2
will combine the CPICH-based channel estimates assuming improper phase shifts for antenna
2
, resulting in an incorrect channel estimate and a degradation in UE performance.
An example algorithm for the determination of the transmit antenna weight is presented in the above mentioned 3GPP specification TS25.214:“Physical layer procedures (FDD)”. The proposed algorithm utilizes a priori probabilities for the transmission weights, i.e., it assumes that the phase shift corresponding to a feedback command that was sent is more probable than a transmission weight corresponding to an inverted FB command (the FB command changed by an error in the feedback channel). The algorithm determines whether it is more probable that a feedback error occurred than that a feedback error did not occur and, based on this decision, the algorithm selects the transmission weight w
2
corresponding to the sequence of transmitted feedback commands, modified according to determined feedback error occurrences.
This proposed algorithm requires knowledge of the relative power levels of the dedicated and common pilot channels, as well as knowledge of the variance of the noise plus interference. However, a reliable estimation of noise variance is a computationally expensive task and is thus undesirable for execution by the UE
2
. While some form of variance estimation is required, in a rapidly changing signal propagation environment the averaging times should be made short, and thus the reliability of the estimate is low. The same considerations and problems apply to the estimation of the relative power levels of the dedicated and the common pilot channels., especially when the dedicated channel power is varied by a fast power control algorithm.
It can be appreciated that problems exist in the mode
1
closed loop transmit diversity operation described above.
OBJECTS AND ADVANTAGES OF THE INVENTION
It is a first object and advantage of this invention to provide an improved technique for the user equipment to determine an estimate of w
2
for use in combining channel estimates.
It is another object and advantage of this invention to provide a method for the user equipment to verify the value of w
2
, where the method does not require an estimation of the noise variance or the relative powers of the dedicated and common pilot channels.
It is another object and advantage of this invention to provide a method for the user equipment to verify the value of w
2
, where the method does not require a determination of a priori probabilities of feedback commands sent to the BS.
It is a further object and advantage of this invention to provide a simple and computationally inexpensive technique for the user equipment to verify the value of w
2
by determining if the last FB bit was in error, and by computing the value of w
2
in the same manner as the BS computes the value of w
2
.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The foregoing and other problems are overcome and the foregoing objects and advantages are realized by methods and apparatus in accordance with e
Salonen Janne Mikael
Valtavaara Juha
Harrington & Smith ,LLP
Nokia Mobile Phone Ltd.
Vo Nguyen
LandOfFree
Antenna verification method for advanced closed loop... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Antenna verification method for advanced closed loop..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Antenna verification method for advanced closed loop... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3115857