Analysing polynucleotide sequences

Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology – Measuring or testing process involving enzymes or... – Involving nucleic acid

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C536S023100, C536S025300, C422S068100, C435S174000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07811751

ABSTRACT:
This invention provides an apparatus and method for analyzing a polynucleotide sequence, either an unknown sequence or a known sequence. A support carries an array of the whole or a chosen part of a complete set of oligonucleotides, which are capable of taking part in hybridization reactions. The polynucleotide sequence, or fragments thereof, are labeled and applied to the array under hybridizing conditions. Applications include analysis of known point mutations, genomic fingerprinting, linkage analysis, characterization of mRNAs, mRNA populations, and sequence determination.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4000252 (1976-12-01), Kosak
patent: 4145406 (1979-03-01), Schick et al.
patent: 4205952 (1980-06-01), Cais
patent: 4216245 (1980-08-01), Johnson
patent: 4254082 (1981-03-01), Schick et al.
patent: 4299916 (1981-11-01), Litman et al.
patent: 4323647 (1982-04-01), Monji et al.
patent: 4327073 (1982-04-01), Huang
patent: 4395486 (1983-07-01), Wilson et al.
patent: 4442204 (1984-04-01), Greenquist et al.
patent: 4451433 (1984-05-01), Yamashita et al.
patent: 4458066 (1984-07-01), Caruthers
patent: 4483964 (1984-11-01), Urdea et al.
patent: 4563419 (1986-01-01), Ranki et al.
patent: 4591550 (1986-05-01), Hafeman et al.
patent: 4591570 (1986-05-01), Chang
patent: 4656127 (1987-04-01), Mundy
patent: 4689405 (1987-08-01), Frank et al.
patent: 4703008 (1987-10-01), Lin
patent: 4704353 (1987-11-01), Humphries et al.
patent: 4719176 (1988-01-01), Klotz
patent: 4728502 (1988-03-01), Hamill
patent: 4731325 (1988-03-01), Palva et al.
patent: 4737464 (1988-04-01), McConnell et al.
patent: 4789630 (1988-12-01), Bloch et al.
patent: 4849330 (1989-07-01), Humphries et al.
patent: 4877745 (1989-10-01), Hayes et al.
patent: 4883579 (1989-11-01), Humphries et al.
patent: 4888278 (1989-12-01), Singer et al.
patent: 4961915 (1990-10-01), Martin
patent: 4963815 (1990-10-01), Hafeman
patent: 4968602 (1990-11-01), Dattagupta
patent: 4981783 (1991-01-01), Augenlicht
patent: 4994373 (1991-02-01), Stavrianopoulos et al.
patent: 5002867 (1991-03-01), Macevicz
patent: 5126276 (1992-06-01), Fish et al.
patent: 5164319 (1992-11-01), Hafeman et al.
patent: 5202231 (1993-04-01), Drmanac et al.
patent: 5348855 (1994-09-01), Dattagupta et al.
patent: 5429807 (1995-07-01), Matson et al.
patent: 5474796 (1995-12-01), Brennan
patent: 5486452 (1996-01-01), Gordon et al.
patent: 5700637 (1997-12-01), Southern
patent: 6054270 (2000-04-01), Southern
patent: 1284931 (1991-06-01), None
patent: 0 063 810 (1982-11-01), None
patent: 0063810 (1982-11-01), None
patent: 0063810 (1982-11-01), None
patent: 0 130 523 (1985-01-01), None
patent: 0 130 739 (1985-01-01), None
patent: 0130523 (1985-01-01), None
patent: 0130739 (1985-01-01), None
patent: 0 142 299 (1985-05-01), None
patent: 0142299 (1985-05-01), None
patent: 0 171 150 (1986-02-01), None
patent: 0171150 (1986-02-01), None
patent: 0171150 (1986-02-01), None
patent: 0194132 (1986-09-01), None
patent: 0 197 266 (1986-10-01), None
patent: 0 228 075 (1987-07-01), None
patent: 0228075 (1987-07-01), None
patent: 0 235 726 (1987-09-01), None
patent: 0 237 362 (1987-09-01), None
patent: 0 238 332 (1987-09-01), None
patent: 0 235726 (1987-09-01), None
patent: 0235726 (1987-09-01), None
patent: 237362 (1987-09-01), None
patent: 0238332 (1987-09-01), None
patent: 0 268 237 (1988-05-01), None
patent: 0268237 (1988-05-01), None
patent: 0268237 (1988-05-01), None
patent: 0 281 927 (1988-09-01), None
patent: 0281927 (1988-09-01), None
patent: 0 304 202 (1989-02-01), None
patent: 0 305 929 (1989-03-01), None
patent: 0 386 229 (1990-09-01), None
patent: 0 392 546 (1990-10-01), None
patent: 0 373 203 (1994-08-01), None
patent: 0 119 573 (1994-09-01), None
patent: 0 194 132 (1996-09-01), None
patent: 1 526 708 (1978-09-01), None
patent: 2 156 074 (1985-10-01), None
patent: 2 197 720 (1988-05-01), None
patent: 83/01459 (1983-04-01), None
patent: 84/01031 (1984-03-01), None
patent: 84/03151 (1984-08-01), None
patent: 84/03564 (1984-09-01), None
patent: 85/01051 (1985-03-01), None
patent: WO 85/01051 (1985-03-01), None
patent: 86/00991 (1986-02-01), None
patent: 86/03782 (1986-07-01), None
patent: 86/06487 (1986-11-01), None
patent: 88/01302 (1988-02-01), None
patent: 89/11548 (1989-11-01), None
patent: 90/15070 (1990-12-01), None
patent: WO 90/15070 (1990-12-01), None
patent: 92/10092 (1992-06-01), None
patent: 93/22480 (1993-11-01), None
patent: 57087 (1990-08-01), None
R. J. Lipshutz et al., “Using Oligonucleotide Probe Arrays to Access Genetic Diversity”, BioTechniques, vol. 19, No. 3, 1995, pp. 442-447.
T. R. Gingeras et al., “Hybridization Properties of Immobilized Nucleic Acid”, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 15, No. 13, 1987, pp. 5373-5390.
P.T. Gilham, “The Synthesis of Polynucleotide-Celluloses and Their use in the Fractionation of Polynucleotides”, J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 86, Nov. 20, 1964, pp. 4982-4985.
H. M. Geysen et al., “Strategies for Epitope Analysis using Peptide Synthesis”, Journal of Immunological Methods, vol. 102, 1987, pp. 259-274.
G. M. Church et al., “Genomic Sequencing”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 81(7), Apr. 1984, pp. 1991-1995.
V. J. Kidd et al., “α1-Antitrypsin Deficiency Detection by Direct Analysis of the Mutation in the Gene”, Nature, vol. 304, Jul. 1983, pp. 230-234.
David Kitchin QC and Richard Meade, Affymetrix' Opening Submissions, in the United Kingdom litigation betweenOxford Gene Technology(OGT) v.Affymetrix, case Nos. HC 1999 02517, HC 1999 04645, pp. 1-81, Mar. 22, 2001, London, United Kingdom.
Bird & Bird, Notice to Admit Facts, in the United Kingdom litigation betweenOxford Gene Technology(OGT) v.Affymetrix, case No. HC 1999 04645, pp. 1-5, Jan. 28, 2000, London, United Kingdom.
Richard Meade, Bristows, Second Defendant's Response to the Claimant's Notice to Admit Facts, in the United Kingdom litigation betweenOxford Gene Technology(OGT) v.Affymetrix, case No. HC 1999 04645, pp. 1-3, Jun. 22, 2000, London, United Kingdom.
Bristows, Particulars of Independently Valid Claims, in the United Kingdom litigation betweenOxford Gene Technology(OGT) v.Affymetrix, case No. HC 1999 04645, pp. 1-2, Jun. 22, 2000, London, United Kingdom.
Richard Meade, Bristows, Statement of Reasons, in the United Kingdom litigation betweenOxford Gene Technology(OGT) v.Affymetrix, case No. HC 1999 04645, pp. 1-4, Jun. 30, 2000, London, United Kingdom.
Bird & Bird, Statement of Opposition, in the United Kingdom litigation betweenOxford Gene Technology(OGT) v.Affymetrix, case No. HC 1999 04645, pp. 1-5, Jun. 30, 2000, London, United Kingdom.
Bird & Bird, Re-Re-Re-Amended Particulars of Objections, in the United Kingdom litigation betweenOxford Gene Technology(OGT) v.Affymetrix, case No. HC 1999 04645, pp. 1-5, Mar. 13, 2001, London, United Kingdom.
Alastair Wilson QC, Amended Particulars of Claim, in the United Kingdom litigation betweenOxford Gene Technology(OGT) v.Affymetrix, case No. HC 1999 02517, pp. 1-11, Nov. 26, 1999, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Bird & Bird, Amended Particulars of Infringement, in the United Kingdom litigation betweenOxford Gene Technology(OGT) v.Affymetrix, case No. HC 1999 02517, pp. 12-14, Sep. 1, 2000, London, United Kingdom.
Richard Meade, Defence and Counterclaim of the First and Second Defendants, in the United Kingdom litigation betweenOxford Gene Technology(OGT) v.Affymetrix, case No. HC 1999 02517, pp. 1-6, Aug. 6, 1999, London, United Kingdom.
Richard Meade, Amended Particulars of Objections of the First and Second Defendants, in the United Kingdom litigation betweenOxford Gene Technology(OGT) v.Affymetrix, case No. HC 1999 02517, pp. 21-37, Jan. 15, 2001, London, United Kingdom.
Manches, Re-Re-Re-Amended Reply and Defence of Counterclaim, in the United Kingdom litigation betweenOxford Gene Technology(OGT) v.Affymetrix, case No. HC 1999 02517, pp. 38-46, Mar. 2000, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Dr. David R. Bentley, Summary of Expert Report, in the United Kingdom litigation betweenOxford Gene Technology(OGT) v.Affymetrix, case Nos. HC 1999 04645 and HC 19

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Analysing polynucleotide sequences does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Analysing polynucleotide sequences, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Analysing polynucleotide sequences will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4185728

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.