Active solid-state devices (e.g. – transistors – solid-state diode – Field effect device – Junction field effect transistor
Reexamination Certificate
1998-07-20
2003-01-21
Williams, Alexander O. (Department: 2826)
Active solid-state devices (e.g., transistors, solid-state diode
Field effect device
Junction field effect transistor
C257S503000, C257S508000, C257S522000, C257S771000, C257S746000, C257S741000, C257S744000, C257S764000, C257S765000, C257S758000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06509590
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF INVENTION
The present invention concerns integrated circuits, particularly metals for forming air-bridge interconnects.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Integrated circuits, the key components in thousands of electronic and computer products, are interconnected networks of electrical components fabricated on a common foundation, or substrate. Fabricators typically use various techniques, such as layering, doping, masking, and etching, to build thousands and even millions of microscopic resistors, transistors, and other electrical components on a silicon substrate, known as a wafer. The components are then “wired,” or interconnected, with aluminum wires to define a specific electric circuit, such as a computer memory. The aluminum wires, normally embedded in insulation, are typically about one micron thick, or about 100 times thinner than a human hair.
As integrated circuits have become progressively smaller and more densely packed, the wiring connecting components has inevitably been spaced closer together. Unfortunately, this closer spacing has increased capacitance between wires. Increased capacitance not only causes cross talk—undesirable signal mixing between adjacent wires—but also wastes power and slows response of integrated circuits to electrical signals. Thus, fabricators are generally concerned with ways to reduce capacitance.
One way to reduce capacitance between the wires is to separate them with an insulation better than silicon dioxide, the most prevalent insulation material. Insulations are rated in terms of a dielectric constant, with lower dielectric constants giving rise to less capacitance than higher dielectric constants. Thus, to reduce capacitance, one can replace the typical silicon-dioxide insulation, which has a dielectric constant of about 4, with an insulator having a lower dielectric constant.
Air, which has a dielectric constant of about 1, is one such insulator. In fact, there are very few, if any, practical insulators with a lower dielectric constant. To use air as an insulator, fabricators have developed an interconnect structure called an air bridge—a conductive wire that extends through an air-filled space of an integrated circuit Most commonly, the microscopic wire bridges a space between two pillars that support its ends. Two air bridges can be placed side by side such that air separates their respective wires, thereby dramatically reducing capacitance between the two wires.
Unfortunately, conventional fabrication techniques are limited to making short air bridges, typically with unsupported, or free-span, lengths about 1 millimeter long (assuming a 500-nanometer thickness and a maximum allowable sag of 250 nanometers). The air bridges must be kept short because the typical aluminum alloy used to make air-bridge conductors is too supple and the conductors sag in the middle, sometimes forming short circuits with other conductors or even breaking. This aluminum alloy includes small amounts of copper and silicon to enhance its electromigration resistance, that is, its resistance to disintegration at high current levels, but nothing to promote its stiffness, or rigidity.
Theoretically, one can enhance rigidity of any given alloy by adding metals known for their rigidity to the alloy. However, most metals that would enhance rigidity of the typical aluminum alloy also substantially increase its density (mass per unit volume) or its electrical resistance, generally rendering the resulting wires too heavy or too electrically resistive to benefit air-bridge applications. For example, adding 25 weight-percent iron, a rigid metal, to the typical aluminum alloy would increase its rigidity about 4 percent but increase its density about 20 percent and its electrical resistance (per unit length) about 15 percent. Increased density makes wires heavier, more prone to sag, and thus less apt to improve air-bridge lengths, while increased resistance wastes power, slows down integrated circuits, and thus offsets the promised advantages of using longer air bridges.
Accordingly, to achieve longer, performance-enhancing air bridges, there remains a need for alloys which have not only better rigidity but also appropriately low electrical resistance and mass density.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
To address these and other needs, the inventor has developed new aluminum-beryllium alloys which, compared to the conventional aluminum alloy, have superior rigidity and comparable electrical resistance. Specifically, one alloy within the scope of the invention contains 25 weight-percent beryllium and 0.5 weight-percent copper, with the balance being aluminum and reasonably unavoidable impurities. This alloy provides an elastic-modulus-to-density (E/&rgr;) ratio (a measure of rigidity) of 40.9 Gpam3/Mg and an electrical resistance of 31.3 nano-ohm-meters (n&OHgr;m). In contrast, a conventional aluminum alloy has an elastic-modulus-to-density ratio of about 25.4 GPam
3
/Mg and an electrical resistance of 28.2 nano-ohm-meters. Thus, this aluminum-beryllium alloy is about 60 percent more rigid with only about 10 percent more electrical resistance than the conventional aluminum alloy. Moreover, all other factors being equal, this aluminum-beryllium alloy facilitates construction of air bridges that are 40-percent longer than bridges using the conventional aluminum alloy. Thus, the present invention promotes integrated circuits with superior speed and efficiency.
REFERENCES:
patent: 1254987 (1918-01-01), Cooper
patent: 1976375 (1934-10-01), Smith
patent: 2244608 (1941-06-01), Cooper
patent: 3147110 (1964-09-01), Foerster
patent: 3337334 (1967-08-01), Fenn et al.
patent: 3506438 (1970-04-01), Krock et al.
patent: 3548915 (1970-12-01), Richmond et al.
patent: 3548948 (1970-12-01), Richmond et al.
patent: 3687737 (1972-08-01), Krock et al.
patent: 3832456 (1974-08-01), Kobetz et al.
patent: 3923500 (1975-12-01), Kitazawa et al.
patent: 4022931 (1977-05-01), Black et al.
patent: 4029377 (1977-06-01), Guglielmi
patent: 4065330 (1977-12-01), Masumoto et al.
patent: 4101855 (1978-07-01), Drapeau
patent: 4158719 (1979-06-01), Frantz
patent: 4233066 (1980-11-01), Sundin et al.
patent: 4314594 (1982-02-01), Pfeifer et al.
patent: 4389429 (1983-06-01), Soclof
patent: 4561173 (1985-12-01), Te Velde
patent: 4709359 (1987-11-01), Loftin
patent: 5045635 (1991-09-01), Kaplo et al.
patent: 5148260 (1992-09-01), Inoue et al.
patent: 5231036 (1993-07-01), Miyauchi et al.
patent: 5324683 (1994-06-01), Fitch et al.
patent: 5324684 (1994-06-01), Kermani et al.
patent: 5336914 (1994-08-01), Andoh
patent: 5399897 (1995-03-01), Cunningham et al.
patent: 5408742 (1995-04-01), Zaidel et al.
patent: 5424030 (1995-06-01), Takahashi
patent: 5444015 (1995-08-01), Aitken et al.
patent: 5457344 (1995-10-01), Bartelink
patent: 5485032 (1996-01-01), Marrs
patent: 5510645 (1996-04-01), Fitch et al.
patent: 5578146 (1996-11-01), Grant et al.
patent: 5667600 (1997-09-01), Grensing et al.
patent: 5725689 (1998-03-01), Nishida et al.
patent: 5852871 (1998-12-01), Khandres
patent: 5891797 (1999-04-01), Farrar
patent: 5994777 (1999-11-01), Farrar
patent: 6015738 (2000-01-01), Levy et al.
patent: 6025261 (2000-02-01), Farrar et al.
patent: 6057226 (2000-05-01), Wong
patent: 6075278 (2000-06-01), Farrar
patent: 6075287 (2000-06-01), Ingraham et al.
patent: 6091475 (2000-07-01), Ogino et al.
patent: 6204065 (2001-03-01), Ochiai
patent: 6265811 (2001-07-01), Takeuchi et al.
patent: 6288905 (2001-09-01), Chung
patent: 2001/0054771 (2001-12-01), Wark et al.
“Phase Diagrams”,Metals Handbook, 10th Ed., vol. 3, (1992).
“Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Pure Metals”,Metals Handbook, 9th ed., vol. 2, (1979).
Dudzinski, N., et al., “The Youngs Modulus of Some Aluminim Alloys”,J. Institute of Metals, vol. LXXIV, pp. 291-314, (1947-48).
Singer, F.L.,Strength of Materials, Harper & Brothers, 229-32, (1951).
Van Horn, K.R., “Aluminim Vol. 1 Properties Physical Metallurgy and Phase Diagrams”,American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, (1967).
Wolf, S., “Chapter 4: Multilevel-Interconnect Technology for VLSI and ULSI”,I
Micro)n Technology, Inc.
Schwegman Lundberg Woessner & Kluth P.A.
Williams Alexander O.
LandOfFree
Aluminum-beryllium alloys for air bridges does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Aluminum-beryllium alloys for air bridges, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Aluminum-beryllium alloys for air bridges will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3054532