Communications: electrical – Condition responsive indicating system – Specific condition
Reexamination Certificate
2001-11-13
2004-03-02
Wu, Daniel J. (Department: 2632)
Communications: electrical
Condition responsive indicating system
Specific condition
C340S571000, C340S568100
Reexamination Certificate
active
06700501
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
Children are inquisitive by nature. Any parent or teacher knows that children are liable to work their way into even the most apparently inaccessible location. This is a natural and healthy part of childhood. Unfortunately, young children are inexperienced and so are often incapable of recognizing dangerous objects or activities that would be clearly recognized as such by an adult. This leads to the unfortunate result that children sometimes attempt to do things that are hazardous, or even life threatening, and occasionally succeed in the task. Accordingly, parents or other guardians are obliged to keep a close watch over young children at all times so as to ensure that they will stay out of harm's way.
Unfortunately, not even the most vigilant person can keep an eye on a child at all times. Parents and other guardians simply have too many things to do to be able to always have the child in their sight. In addition, a guardian often must monitor the activities of multiple children, not all of whom are necessarily in the same location. Accordingly, children often do have opportunities to engage in dangerous behavior when relatively unsupervised.
One object found in the typical home, notorious for its seeming allure and danger to children, is the common electrical outlet. Children are famously fond of attempting to insert their fingers or small objects into the receptacles of such outlets. Moreover, it is usually quite simple for them to do so, as the outlets are typically placed close to the ground and so are in easy reach of even the smallest child. In addition, being at about the eye level of a crawling child, they easily become objects of his or her interest.
It is obvious that a child succeeding in inserting an object into an electrical outlet can lead to undesirable consequences. Once the object, if conductive, makes contact with the wiring inside the outlet, an electrical circuit will be formed and electricity will race along the object, through the child's body, and into the ground. This results in the electrocution of the child. Usually the effect is not lethal. However, it is certainly quite painful, and certainly not beneficial to the child's health.
The present invention provides means to alert a parent or other guardian to the fact that an outlet is about to be accessed. This will hopefully give the person sufficient warning to be able to interrupt the child and prevent the child from doing harm to themselves. There are some current patents that feature alarm systems, regarding appliances or electrical currents but do not meet the specific needs of the present invention.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,090,948, issued to Cremer on May 21, 1963, describes an alarm system in which the plug to an electrical appliance sets off an alarm when unplugged from the outlet. This device is intended to prevent theft of the appliance.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,411,150, issued to Schulein on Nov. 12, 1968, describes an alarm that also activates when an appliance is unplugged from an outlet, but is enclosed in the outlets it monitors. The outlet has amplifiers wired in the interior to set off an alarm if appliances are cut from the outlet. Schulein's invention is intended to monitor many outlets, as in a hotel, or other high risk location, at one time.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,289,194, issued to King on Nov. 26, 1966, relates to an alarm designed to sound when an appliance is severed or otherwise detached from its power source. The alarm is activated when the device loses power and not, as is the case with the present invention, when it is physically removed from an electrical outlet. In addition, it is designed to be specific to appliance theft in its application.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,781,857 issued to Stendig, et al., on Dec. 25, 1973 shows condition responsive receptacles. Stendig's invention is unlike the present invention because it is an electric outlet mechanism with a plug arm, not an alarm system. Stendig's invention is not a device to protect children from exposed outlets, and has no method of warning a caregiver of a child tampering with an outlet.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,037,223 issued to Tucci, et al., on Jul. 19, 1977 shows an audible alarm system for electrical outlets. Tucci's invention is unlike the present invention because it has an opening door on the front, and a child could open Tucci's invention and disable it by removing the standard battery. Instead in the present invention the child would have to remove the backing, which would sound the alarm, once removed from the outlet, alerting the caregiver of the tampering.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,097,843 issued to Basile on Jun. 27, 1978 shows a warning device and receptacle adapter. Basile's invention is unlike the present invention because it is a warning system for alerting the user if an appliance becomes unplugged or if the power source to the appliance has been interrupted. Basile's invention does not provide a means for alerting a caregiver of an open outlet, and is connected to the affected appliance and not to the outlet when an appliance is not applied.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,584,570 issued to Dotson on Apr. 22, 1986 shows an electrical appliance plug removal alarm. Dotson's invention is unlike the present invention because it is a disc used to place between the appliance plug and the outlet, when the appliance is unplugged the disc will trip the circuit breaker to that plug. Dotson's invention is intended to protect hotels from appliance theft. Dotson's invention is unlike the present invention because it is only activated when an electrical plug is pulled from an outlet, or if the cord to the appliance is cut. It does not cover unused outlets, and has no audible alarm included to alert a caregiver that the outlet is open and available to the child.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,855,719 issued to Posey on Aug. 8, 1989 shows an electrical receptacle alarm switch. Posey's invention is unlike the present invention because it is an alarm system for alerting a user when an appliance has been unplugged. Posey's invention relies on a three-prong plug to an electrical appliance to be inserted into an outlet equipped with the alarm system. It does not provide an external alarm cover for outlets that can be accessible to children, and would not function in a two-prong outlet.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,162,793, issued to Plost et al. on Nov. 10, 1992, is relevant to an electrically powered alarm system designed to go off when a plug is removed from an aperture. However, the invention in question is to be used in drain plugs used in watercraft, and not in an electrical outlet.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,714,942 issued to Buchanan on Feb. 3, 1998 shows an alarm system for indicating the removal of plug from a receptacle. Buchanan's invention is unlike the present invention because it is a plate mechanism for protecting both outlets in a receptacle and does not have a mechanism for protecting one outlet at a time. Buchanan's invention requires covering both outlets to function, whereas the present invention allows a caregiver to cover only one outlet in a receptacle if the other is in use.
Previous patents are also existent which disclose protective covers or shields of various sorts for electrical outlets. Examples of this are: U.S. Design Pat. No. 267,226, issued to Oster on Dec. 14, 1982; U.S. Design Pat. No. 279,860, issued to Schwalbe on Jul. 30, 1985; and U.S. Design Pat. No. 310,320, issued to Domian on Sep. 4, 1990. None of these patents describe outlet plugs designed to sound a warning when removed from an electrical outlet. Indeed, none utilize electrical power in any way whatsoever.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,484,185, issued to Graves on Nov. 20, 1984, describes a plug adapter designed to make electrical outlets virtually inaccessible to small children. It does not, however, feature an audible alarm as a component element.
There also exist patents describing alarm systems of a more general sort. Examples of this include: U.S. Pat. No. 5,652,568, issued to Ko on Jul. 29, 1997; Japanese Patent No. 64-229,423
Nguyen Phung
Pillsbury & Winthrop LLP
Wu Daniel J.
LandOfFree
Alarm system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Alarm system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Alarm system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3221707