Valves and valve actuation – Fluid actuated or retarded – Pilot or servo type motor
Reexamination Certificate
2003-05-23
2004-12-14
Bastianelli, John (Department: 3754)
Valves and valve actuation
Fluid actuated or retarded
Pilot or servo type motor
C251S357000, C251S360000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06830230
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to an air blast device.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In various applications, it is necessary to remove accumulations of materials that impair the proper functioning of the installation.
Such is the case in cement works or bulk materials silos that are emptied by gravity.
To do this, instead of using purely mechanical means like a metal bar manipulated by an individual, it is known to use air blast devices.
The principle of these devices consists of filling a reservoir or a container with air at a given pressure and to allow the air to escape suddenly so as to produce a blast.
Under the effect of the blast, the accumulations of materials are broken up.
The advantage of these devices consists in the fact that they can function automatically and be disposed in places that are not readily accessible.
The known devices comprise a device for controlling the flow of a gaseous fluid established on a course linking the gaseous fluid accumulator and possibly an ejection nozzle.
Thus, conventionally, the blast device comprises a body housing a piston whose front face closes a so-called outlet port that opens into an outlet conduit, this body having an inlet conduit that connects it to the reservoir or container.
Throughout the filling period of the container, the rear face of this piston is subjected to a pressure that holds the piston over the outlet.
When the pressure maintaining the pressure on the piston is released, the latter suddenly moves back and allows the fluid to pass from the container to the outlet conduit, which may or may not incorporate a nozzle.
In the devices known to date, the outlet conduit has a constant cross-section along its longitudinal axis identical to that of the port between the container and the body of the device.
However, quite often, the geometry of the outlet conduit is different along the axis, i.e., at the level of the area to which the piston is applied, the cross-section of the outlet conduit is circular, sometimes evolving into an ellipse.
The efficiency of these devices is directly linked to the discharge speed of the air contained in the reservoir.
This ejection speed specifically depends on the opening speed of the piston.
Thus, we conceived of making the piston lighter.
To do this, the latter is given the shape of a cup, particularly a truncated one, whose convex front face closes the outlet port and whose concave rear face supports a means for guiding it with the body of the device.
This guiding means is preferably reduced to a slider that moves inside a guide attached to rear of the body.
This makes it possible both to make the piston lighter and to reduce friction by reducing the guide surfaces.
Particularly for purposes of installing these blast devices, it is convenient for the inlet conduit that connects the fluid flow control device to the container to be approximately perpendicular to the outlet conduit.
This also makes it possible to limit the distance between the inlet and the outlet.
Along its course, there is necessarily a loss of pressure that reduces the efficiency of the device.
It is of course possible to increase the efficiency of these devices by increasing the volumetric capacity of the reservoir or by increasing the pressure of the air contained in the reservoir, but this is not always possible, either for economic reasons or because of the installation of the blast devices.
Another problem results from the noise produced by the evacuation of the air contained in the rear chamber.
In order to reduce the noise during the emptying of the rear chamber, it is thus known to evacuate the air contained in this chamber, either directly or indirectly, into the outlet conduit.
To do this, it is known from U.S. Pat. No. 4,201,362 to equip the front pace of the piston with a series of valves disposed one behind the other.
Such an assembly results in an increase in the weight of the main valve, and hence a loss of efficiency in the device.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention proposes to offer a solution for improving the efficiency of the aforementioned systems.
To this end, the subject of the invention is an air blast device comprising an air flow control device disposed between an inlet conduit and an outlet conduit, which control device comprises a so-called evacuation valve that controls the flow of the air contained in a so-called rear chamber to the outlet conduit, this air holding a main valve in its seat, this blast device being characterized in that the seat of this evacuation valve is located at the level of the front face of the main valve, and in order to evacuate the air contained in the rear chamber, the so-called evacuation valve moves forward, in the direction opposite that of the main valve as it leaves its seat.
REFERENCES:
patent: 2398775 (1946-04-01), Beekley et al.
patent: 3114532 (1963-12-01), Gray et al.
patent: 4201362 (1980-05-01), Hideaki et al.
patent: 6253784 (2001-07-01), Simoens
patent: 6390442 (2002-05-01), Tokuda et al.
patent: 12 59 160 (1968-01-01), None
patent: 2 660 394 (1991-10-01), None
patent: 2 067 269 (1981-07-01), None
patent: 2 226 429 (1990-06-01), None
patent: WO 97 43195 (1997-11-01), None
Bastianelli John
Kondracki Edward J.
Miles & Stockbridge P.C.
LandOfFree
Air blast device does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Air blast device, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Air blast device will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3278146