Electricity: measuring and testing – Measuring – testing – or sensing electricity – per se – With rotor
Reexamination Certificate
2001-04-30
2003-05-13
Cuneo, Kamand (Department: 2829)
Electricity: measuring and testing
Measuring, testing, or sensing electricity, per se
With rotor
C324S754120, C324S754120
Reexamination Certificate
active
06563301
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND
The present invention relates generally to testing of electronic devices. More particularly, the present invention relates to a cellular Radio Frequency (RF) mobile station production/testing and statistical monitoring process.
Prior art production methodology relied on centralized testers doing long arduous test plans and catching process problems long after they occurred. The testers were then considered suspect until proven innocent at which point the actual proximate cause could be investigated and corrected. Often after significant numbers of unsound and unreliable product were built, and subsequently a massive rework effort ensued. This results in wasted product, money, and resources.
Prior art test/production methodology uses an aging, centralized process with very expensive Automated Test Equipment (ATE) and fixture equipment. ATE is a chassis populated with instruments, controlled by a computer, which controls various measurements and tests on a Device Under Test (DUT), and records results fixture equipment. Because the testing is centralized in RF shielded fixtures, (essentially miniature RF chambers), expensive manipulation systems or more expensive and less reliable human operators are required to pick and place DUTs into testers. Valuable time is wasted as the DUT is drawn into the fixture, interfaces are engaged, and power is applied to the DUT. With some electronic devices such as mobile stations, there is a latency or delay between the application of power and when the device is ready or “awake.” When the DUT is finally “awake” the DUT must be placed in the conditions for the test. Finally, a given ATE instrument may perform an action upon the DUT and then sit idle while all other measurements and actions are performed. Once all actions are complete, the DUT is disengaged, extracted, picked and placed back to the conveyor, and sent to the next stage of production. Actual idle time by the ATE instruments may be around 80%. ATE equipment is expensive with average costs in the six figure range. Therefore, it is desirable to reduce idle time and increase the productivity of any ATE.
Prior art processes require automated testing of displays and user interfaces of the DUT in the tester by key press robots. A key press robot is usually contained inside a final user interface test fixture and is used for mechanically interfacing a device under test. The key press robot is RF shielded and is a “drawer-like slide mechanism with a fixture adapter mounted on it. The fixture adapter is specific for the device. The adapter clamps, grabs, or secures the device depending on the type of fixture and the specific attachment surfaces of the device. The adapter also interfaces ear phone jacks, power, etc., and the slide is drawn into the fixture pneumatically.
Once inside the fixture, the device is run through a series of functions and responses are measured to ensure it falls within acceptable limits. In an example of an embodiment of the present invention, a mobile station is the electronic device. A display test is run measured with a sophisticated vision system to ensure all the LEDs, display patterns, keypad backlights etc are functionally sound and reliable. Audio tests measure the speakers and microphones. The phone is brought up into a call and it's transmitter/receiver tuning and power accuracy is measured. A pneumatic robot finger presses each key and ensures that every one functions, does not jam, and the like. Because it's pneumatic it's relatively slow.
The speed of a key press robot becomes the bottleneck. There is a delay caused by power-up of the Device Under Test (DUT) and the pneumatic fingers. Testing at the point of assembly allows better process verification, and places responsibility with the process or vendor quality.
Production and testing systems are monitored by an experienced human. A human supervising the process with undivided attention is still unable to effectively monitor and identify a yield-threatening trend. The intricacy and range of data managed by a single tester in production is currently difficult for less than experienced engineers. The ability for many individuals to further understand and correlate the measurement values and hidden inter-relationships is exponentially complex when stages of 10 testers are aggregated, compounded yet again by correlating inter-relationships between test stages.
In the cellular handset production arena, the current production/test methodology to produce cellular handsets will require a 400% increase in current test equipment, manpower, and floor space.
Earlier production methodology relied on centralized testers doing long arduous test plans, and catching process problems long after they occurred. The testers were then considered suspect until proven innocent at which point the actual proximate cause could be investigated and corrected. Often after significant numbers of unsound and unreliable product was built, and subsequently a massive rework effort ensued. Testers are often relied upon to “test” quality into the system. There is a need to verify processes at the point of operation, and identify problems early.
Prior to the advent of the present invention, monitoring consisted of technicians and supervisors standing in front of a monitor flipping through displays. If experienced, they can identify trends as they became statistically significant. Often that effort is investigative, only drawing attention after the problem becomes significant. Even experienced monitors may have problems monitoring multiple testers with their exponentially increasing complexity as stated above. Other methods for monitoring included exhaustive Statistical Process Control (SPC) tools which required highly trained and competent engineers targeting specific points of data not close to real-time.
It is in light of this background information related to the production and testing of electronic devices that the significant improvement of the present invention has evolved.
SUMMARY
Embodiments of the present invention, accordingly, advantageously provide a cellular RF handset production/testing and statistical monitoring process.
Provided is an advanced process for moving a Device under Test (DUT) from surface mount to completion and shipping. The process takes a raw populated Printed Circuit Board (PCB) panel or similar article of manufacture and conducts all possible solder, electrical, boundary scan and flashed self-testing.
Individual panels are routed out of larger panels and placed into basic electronic device chassis on a motorized and power delivering fixture carrying a fixture adapter to interface with the electronic device. Power is provided as soon as is feasible in order to leverage the DUTs ability to facilitate it's own functional certification. Without power, the “wake-up” time for an electronic device may be extensive. For example, the wake-up time for a mobile station is 5 to 15 seconds. Additionally, the addition of power would otherwise have to be done numerous times throughout the process. Conditions for impending measurement can be set up on a powered electronic device so that measurements may be made the moment the testing instrumentation is ready to take measurements.
The DUT is interfaced and carried by a fixture adapter modified to mate the specific model DUT. The fixture adapter is mounted aboard a fixture, which serves as vehicular, power source, and communication suite for the adapter. The individual fixture has an addressable code. This code may be an internet address or the like. The code may also be analogous in form and function to a phone number. Using RF communication, the fixtures report to and are directed by a master control system which tracks progress and measurement results through each stage of assembly.
Various required measurements, tests, and software instructions are conducted wirelessly in a distributed fashion while the DUT advances through the process. Wireless methods, for example, include Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) BLUETOOTH, and cellular RF o
Cuneo Kamand
Nguyen Jimmy
Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd.
Shaw Steven A.
LandOfFree
Advanced production test method and apparatus for testing... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Advanced production test method and apparatus for testing..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Advanced production test method and apparatus for testing... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3071272