Administration of oligonucleotides antisense to dopamine recepto

Drug – bio-affecting and body treating compositions – Designated organic active ingredient containing – Carbohydrate doai

Patent

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

536 245, 536 243, 536 2431, 536 2433, 536325, 536352, 536353, 536366, 435 6, 4351723, 4353201, 435375, 424417, 424450, 935 6, 935 8, 935 34, 935 76, A01N 4304, C07H 2104

Patent

active

058407081

DESCRIPTION:

BRIEF SUMMARY
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to treatment of pathological conditions associated with abnormalities in dopamine receptors. In particular, it relates to diagnosis and treatment of patients having such pathological conditions by administration of oligonucleotides antisense to one or more mRNA molecules encoding one of the several dopamine receptors.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Abnormal activity of the dopaminergic nervous system has been implicated in a number of motor and behavioral disorders including Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, tardive dyskinesia, certain forms of schizophrenia and other dystonias and dyskinesias. Dysfunctions of the dopaminergic system may be caused either by a reduced or increased activity of the dopaminergic system or by the inability of the systems to be modulated by a changing external or internal environment.
Dopamine is one of the major catecholamine neurotransmitters in the mammalian brain. Dopamine exerts its effect in part by binding to G protein-coupled dopamine receptors. Pharmacological and molecular biological studies have shown that the dopamine receptor has at least five subtypes, designated D.sub.1-5. The best characterized of these are D.sub.1 and D.sub.2. The D.sub.2 subtype exists in a long and short form, the long form having a larger intracellular loop than the short form. These receptor subtypes appear to be anatomically, biochemically and behaviorally distinct. For example, D.sub.1 and D.sub.2 receptors have different anatomical distributions, in that only D.sub.1 receptors are found in the retina and only D.sub.2 receptors are found in the pituitary, but both D.sub.1 and D.sub.2 are found in the striatum and substantia nigra. D.sub.1 and D.sub.2 receptors are reported to have opposite biochemical effects on adenylate cyclase activity, and stimulation of D.sub.1 and D.sub.2 receptors produces different behavioral responses. See Weiss et al., Neurochemical Pharmacology--A Tribute to B. B. Brody, E. Costa, ed.; Raven Press, Ltd., New York; pp. 149-164 (1989).
Recently, three new subtypes of dopamine receptors have been discovered. On the basis of nucleotide and amino acid sequence homology, D.sub.3 and D.sub.4 have been found to be related to D.sub.2, and D.sub.5 is related to D.sub.1. Hence, the dopamine receptor subtypes may be categorized into two subfamilies, D.sub.1 and D.sub.5 being members of the D.sub.1 subfamily, and D.sub.2, D.sub.3 and D.sub.4 being members of the D.sub.2 subfamily. See Sibley et al., Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 13: 61-69 (February, 1992).
The dopamine receptor subtypes can be separately and independently modulated through the administration of selective agonists and antagonists. For example, whereas dopamine and apomorphine are agonists of both D.sub.1 and D.sub.2 receptors, SKF 38393 (Setler et al., Eur. J. Pharmacol., 50: 419-30, 1978) is a selective agonist of only D.sub.1 and quinpirole (Tsuruta et al., Nature, 292: 463-65, 1981) is a relatively selective agonist for the D.sub.2 receptor. It should be emphasized, however, that the currently available dopaminergic drugs have only a relative selectivity for the various dopamine receptors. Indeed, there are recent reports suggesting that quinpirole may have a higher affinity for D.sub.3 receptors than for D.sub.2 receptors (see Sokoloff et al., Nature, 347: 146-151 (1990)).
It is not surprising, therefore, that the use of specific and nonspecific neuroleptic drugs in the treatment of dopaminergic disorders is contraindicated by the fact that such drugs often produce numerous side effects, presumably due to cross-reactivity with other dopamine receptor subtypes, or even with other classes of neuroreceptors. For example, the therapeutic action of many neuroleptic drugs appears to be due to a blockade of dopamine D.sub.2 receptors. However, patients treated with such drugs often develop tardive dyskinesia, possibly because of the up-regulation of dopamine receptors. A further example is that benzazepines (such as SKF-38393), which are a major D.sub

REFERENCES:
Crystal et al. (1995) Science 270: 404-410.
B. Weiss et al., Neurochemical Pharmacology--A Tribute to B.B. Brodie, E. Costa, ed., Raven Press, Ltd., New York, pp. 149-164 (1989).
D. Sibley et al., Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 13: 61-69 (1992).
P.E. Settler et al., Eur. J. Pharmacol., 50: 419-430 (1978).
K. Tsuruta et al., Nature, 292: 463-465 (1981).
P. Sokoloff et al., Nature, 347: 146-151 (1990).
K. Nicklaus et al., J. of Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 247: 343-348 (1988).
D. Hoyer et al., Eur. J. Pharmacol., 150: 181-184 (1988).
H. Van Tol et al., Nature, 358: 149-152 (1992).
E. Uhlmann et al., Chemical Review, 90: 544-584 (1990).
M. Simons et al., Nature, 359: 67-70 (1992).
R. Burch et al., J. Clin. Invest., 88: 1190-1196 (1991).
K. Mack et al., J. Neurochem., 57: 795-801 (1991).
D. Grandy et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 86: 9762-9766 (1989).
H. Van Tol et al., Nature 350: 610-614 (1991).
Q. Zhou et al., Nature, 347: 76-80 (1990).
R. Sunahara et al., Nature, 350: 614-619 (1991).
A. Dearry et al., Nature, 347: 72-76 (1990).
M. Minowa et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89: 3045-3049 (1992).
S. Agrawal et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88: 7595-7599 (1991).
P.S. Miller et al., Anti-Cancer Drug Design, 2: 117-128 (1987).
C. Bennett et al., Mol. Pharmacol., 41: 1023-1033 (1992).
S.L. Loke et al., Current Topics Microbiol. Immunol., 141: 282-289 (1988).
J. Connor et al., Cancer Res., 46: 3431-3435 (1986).
R. Iyer et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112: 1253-1254 (1990).
E. Uhlmann et al. Chemical Reviews 90(4): 543-584 ('90).
P. Westermann et al. Biomed. Biochim. Acta 48(1): 85-93 ('89).
W. James Antirival Chem. & Chemotherapy 2(4): 191-214 ('91).
J. Milligan et al. J. Med. Chem. 36(14):1923-1937 ('93).
B. Tsang et al., Cancer Gene Therapy 1(1): 65-71 ('94).
C. Stein et al., Science 261: 1004-12 ('93).

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Administration of oligonucleotides antisense to dopamine recepto does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Administration of oligonucleotides antisense to dopamine recepto, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Administration of oligonucleotides antisense to dopamine recepto will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-1702329

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.