Furnaces – Process – Supplying fluid
Reexamination Certificate
2002-10-24
2004-09-14
Rinehart, Kenneth (Department: 3749)
Furnaces
Process
Supplying fluid
C110S347000, C110S309000, C110S310000, C110S10400A, C110S106000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06789488
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
The invention relates to pulverized coal boiler systems and, more particularly, to riffler assembly and flow control element (e.g. adjustable air foil) designs for balancing the flows of pulverized coal therein.
BACKGROUND ART
In a typical large pulverized coal boiler, coal particulate and primary air flow from the pulverizers to the burners through a network of fuel lines that are referred to as coal pipes.
FIG. 1
illustrates a typical large pulverized coal boiler inclusive of pulverizer(s)
10
, furnace
30
, and network of coal pipes
20
. For proper operation of the boiler, all the coal pipes
20
connected to any one of the pulverizers
10
should carry the same coal flow rates and the same flow rates of primary air.
Unfortunately, differences in coal and primary air flow rates from one coal pipe
20
to the next are a limiting factor in the ability to reduce NO
X
emissions in pulverized coal boilers. High carbon monoxide emissions and high levels of unburned carbon can result from burner imbalances. High fly ash unburned carbon, in turn, can adversely affect electrostatic precipitator collection efficiency and result in elevated stack particulate emission levels. Imbalances in coal pipe flows can also lead to maintenance problems associated with coal pipe erosion and/or clogging (e.g. excessive localized coal accumulation), damage to burners and windboxes, and accelerated waterwall wastage. Problems such as these reduce the operating flexibility of the boiler and often require that the boiler be operated under conditions which produce higher NO
X
levels than would otherwise be achieved.
The distribution of primary air throughout the coal piping network is controlled by the flow resistances of the various coal pipes
20
. Because of differences in pipe lengths and numbers and types of elbows in each fuel line, the different coal pipes from a pulverizer will usually have different flow resistances. It is known that orifices or flow restrictors can be installed within the pipes
20
for use in adjusting the individual primary air flows to make them equal.
For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,593,131 to O. Briggs and J. Sund shows a Variable Orifice Plate for Coal Pipes for balancing coal pipe flows.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,685,240 to O. Briggs and J. Sund shows a Variable Orifice Plate for Coal Pipes.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,094,492 to R. Beeman and S. Brajkovich shows a Variable Orifice Using an Iris Shutter.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,779,546 to W. Walsh shows a Fuel Line Orifice.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,975,141 to M. Higazy shows an On-Line Variable Orifice.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,459,922 to R. Chadshay shows an Externally Adjustable Pipe Orifice Assembly.
It can be seen in the above-cited references that orifices with both fixed geometry and adjustable geometry are available commercially.
While the use of fixed or adjustable orifices can be an effective way of balancing primary air flow rates, evidence from field and laboratory measurements indicates the orifices have little effect on coal flow rates. Instead, the coal flow distribution among the pipes is affected most strongly by flow conditions and geometry in the inlet regions of the pipes.
FIG. 2
illustrates a coal pipe
20
according to one piping arrangement commonly encountered in pulverized coal boiler systems. This arrangement involves coal and primary air flow from one pipe
20
dividing into two flows at a Y-shaped junction/splitter. Industry-wide experience shows the coal flow rates among the two outlet pipes
22
,
23
can be severely imbalanced. More specifically, conventional orifices
40
a-b
are installed to prevent primary air flow imbalance and the underlying table shows the results from a series of laboratory tests carried out on the effectiveness of orifices
40
a-b
. As the data show, selection of the proper orifices
40
a-b
as required to balance the primary air flow rates did not simultaneously result in a balanced coal flow distribution. In fact, in this case, the orifices
40
a-b
increased the coal flow imbalance from 9.45% to 18.4%.
Another attempted solution for the coal flow imbalance is the use of adjustable baffles to modify the coal flow distribution among the outlet pipes
22
,
23
. The following references describe the use of baffles to modify coal flow distribution.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,570,549 to N. Trozzi shows a Splitter for Use with a Coal-Fired Furnace Utilizing a Low Load Burner.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,478,157 to R. Musto shows a Mill Recirculation System.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,412,496 to N. Trozzi shows a Combustion System and Method for a Coal-Fired Furnace Utilizing a Low Load Coal Burner.
In all of the above-described designs, the baffle is located upstream of the Y-junction and is used to control the relative amounts of coal flowing through the two outlet pipes
22
,
23
. This use of adjustable baffles can be an effective way of modifying the distribution of the coal flow because the baffles can be adjusted to various positions. However, adjustment of the baffles also simultaneously causes unacceptably large changes in primary air flow distribution. As a consequence, it is very difficult with an adjustable baffle approach to simultaneously balance coal and primary air flow rates.
A third alternative comprises the insertion of a slotted riffler in a splitter box as shown in
FIG. 3
(prior art). The slotted riffler configuration is also commercially used to reduce fuel flow imbalances. The slotted riffler concept consists of a series of flow channels with rectangular cross sections, each of which directs a portion of the coal and primary air flow to one of the outlet pipes. Field measurements show that while these types of rifflers can help to reduce coal flow imbalance arising from a mal-distribution of coal flow at the inlet, they generally do not eliminate the imbalance. Additional fine control of the coal flow distribution is still needed.
Often, due to the configuration of the boiler system, the flow from a single coal pipe must be split into more than two flows.
FIG. 4
shows an example of a four-way splitter arrangement
100
that is sometimes encountered in pulverized coal boiler systems. The arrangement
100
involves coal and primary air flow from a single pipe
102
dividing into four flows at a four-way splitter
104
. Industry experience shows that the coal flow rates among the four outlet pipes
106
a-d
can be severely imbalanced. This is because the distribution of coal flow rates among the pipes
106
a-d
strongly depends on the pulverized coal flow distribution at the inlet cross-section of the four-way splitter
104
, and a significant pulverized coal flow non-uniformity exists due to an upstream elbow
110
. The non-uniformity causes the coal particles to stratify into a narrow localized stream (i.e. rope flow) close to the outer wall of the elbow
110
. For this reason, a flow splitter must be installed either sufficiently far from an elbow or be designed to accommodate significant coal flow non-uniformity. However, due to the space limitations associated with many applications/installations, a flow splitter has to be installed immediately after an elbow where, as stated above, the coal particulate exists as a narrow, localized rope flow.
FIG. 5
shows a sub-section of a known existing installation where a Venturi
112
was installed between the exit of the elbow
114
and the inlet of the four-way splitter
116
in an attempt to lower inherent coal flow imbalances. Laboratory testing with this configuration showed a ±35% coal flow imbalance among the four outlet pipes
118
.
In the foregoing and all other known designs, the Venturi/restrictor(s) are fixed. The use of adjustable baffles would be a more effective way of modifying the distribution of the coal flow because the baffles can be adjusted to various positions. However, adjustment of baffles would also simultaneously cause unacceptably large changes in primary air flow distribution. As a consequence, it is very difficult with an adjustable baffle approach to simultaneously balance coal and primary air flow rates.
It would, therefor
Bilirgen Harun
Levy Edward Kenneth
Yilmaz Ali
Law Offices of Royal W. Craig
Rinehart Kenneth
LandOfFree
Adjustable flow control elements for balancing pulverized... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Adjustable flow control elements for balancing pulverized..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Adjustable flow control elements for balancing pulverized... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3187987