Adaptive junk message filtering system

Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput – Computer conferencing – Demand based messaging

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Reexamination Certificate

active

10374005

ABSTRACT:
The invention relates to a system for filtering messages—the system includes a seed filter having associated therewith a false positive rate and a false negative rate. A new filter is also provided for filtering the messages, the new filter is evaluated according to the false positive rate and the false negative rate of the seed filter, the data used to determine the false positive rate and the false negative rate of the seed filter are utilized to determine a new false positive rate and a new false negative rate of the new filter as a function of threshold. The new filter is employed in lieu of the seed filter if a threshold exists for the new filter such that the new false positive rate and new false negative rate are together considered better than the false positive and the false negative rate of the seed filter.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5619648 (1997-04-01), Canale et al.
patent: 5704017 (1997-12-01), Heckerman et al.
patent: 5805801 (1998-09-01), Holloway et al.
patent: 5884033 (1999-03-01), Duvall et al.
patent: 5905859 (1999-05-01), Holloway et al.
patent: 6047242 (2000-04-01), Benson
patent: 6052709 (2000-04-01), Paul
patent: 6072942 (2000-06-01), Stockwell et al.
patent: 6101531 (2000-08-01), Eggleston et al.
patent: 6112227 (2000-08-01), Heiner
patent: 6161130 (2000-12-01), Horvitz et al.
patent: 6167434 (2000-12-01), Pang
patent: 6192360 (2001-02-01), Dumais et al.
patent: 6199102 (2001-03-01), Cobb
patent: 6266692 (2001-07-01), Greenstein
patent: 6308273 (2001-10-01), Goertzel et al.
patent: 6314421 (2001-11-01), Sharnoff et al.
patent: 6321267 (2001-11-01), Donaldson
patent: 6327617 (2001-12-01), Fawcett
patent: 6330590 (2001-12-01), Cotten
patent: 6370526 (2002-04-01), Agrawal et al.
patent: 6393465 (2002-05-01), Leeds
patent: 6421709 (2002-07-01), McCormick et al.
patent: 6424997 (2002-07-01), Buskirk, Jr. et al.
patent: 6434600 (2002-08-01), Waite et al.
patent: 6453327 (2002-09-01), Nielsen
patent: 6477551 (2002-11-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 6484197 (2002-11-01), Donohue
patent: 6484261 (2002-11-01), Wiegel
patent: 6505250 (2003-01-01), Freund et al.
patent: 6546416 (2003-04-01), Kirsch
patent: 6592627 (2003-07-01), Agrawal et al.
patent: 6615242 (2003-09-01), Riemers
patent: 6633855 (2003-10-01), Auvenshine
patent: 6643686 (2003-11-01), Hall
patent: 6684201 (2004-01-01), Brill
patent: 6691156 (2004-02-01), Drummond et al.
patent: 6701440 (2004-03-01), Kim et al.
patent: 6728690 (2004-04-01), Meek et al.
patent: 6732149 (2004-05-01), Kephart
patent: 6732157 (2004-05-01), Gordon et al.
patent: 6732273 (2004-05-01), Byers
patent: 6742047 (2004-05-01), Tso
patent: 6751348 (2004-06-01), Buzuloiu et al.
patent: 6757830 (2004-06-01), Tarbotto et al.
patent: 6768991 (2004-07-01), Hearnden
patent: 6775704 (2004-08-01), Watson et al.
patent: 6779021 (2004-08-01), Bates et al.
patent: 6842773 (2005-01-01), Ralston et al.
patent: 6915334 (2005-07-01), Hall
patent: 6928465 (2005-08-01), Earnest
patent: 6971023 (2005-11-01), Makinson et al.
patent: 2001/0046307 (2001-11-01), Wong
patent: 2002/0016956 (2002-02-01), Fawcett
patent: 2002/0059425 (2002-05-01), Belfiore et al.
patent: 2002/0073157 (2002-06-01), Newman et al.
patent: 2002/0091738 (2002-07-01), Rohrabaugh et al.
patent: 2002/0184315 (2002-12-01), Earnest
patent: 2002/0199095 (2002-12-01), Bandini et al.
patent: 2003/0009698 (2003-01-01), Lindeman et al.
patent: 2003/0016872 (2003-01-01), Sun
patent: 2003/0037074 (2003-02-01), Dwork et al.
patent: 2003/0041126 (2003-02-01), Buford et al.
patent: 2003/0088627 (2003-05-01), Rothwell et al.
patent: 2003/0167311 (2003-09-01), Kirsch
patent: 2003/0200541 (2003-10-01), Cheng et al.
patent: 2003/0204569 (2003-10-01), Andrews et al.
patent: 2003/0229672 (2003-12-01), Kohn
patent: 2004/0003283 (2004-01-01), Goodman et al.
patent: 2004/0015554 (2004-01-01), Wilson
patent: 2004/0054887 (2004-03-01), Paulsen et al.
patent: 2004/0073617 (2004-04-01), Milliken et al.
patent: 2004/0093371 (2004-05-01), Burrows et al.
patent: 2004/0139160 (2004-07-01), Wallace et al.
patent: 2004/0139165 (2004-07-01), McMillan et al.
patent: 2004/0177120 (2004-09-01), Kirsch
patent: 2004/0199585 (2004-10-01), Wang
patent: 2004/0199594 (2004-10-01), Radatti et al.
patent: 2005/0015455 (2005-01-01), Liu
patent: 2006/0036701 (2006-02-01), Bulfer et al.
patent: 1376427 (2003-03-01), None
patent: 1376427 (2004-01-01), None
patent: 1376427 (2004-01-01), None
patent: 9967731 (1999-12-01), None
patent: WO 02/071286 (2002-09-01), None
patent: WO 2004/059506 (2004-07-01), None
European Search Report dated Apr. 6, 2006 and mailed Apr. 6, 2006 for EP 04102242, 3 pages.
Graham. “The Future of SPAM” (2003) Computer Journal, CSI Computer Security Institute, vol. 19, No. 1, 6 pages.
International Search (report dated Jan. 17, 2006, mailed Jan. 31, 2006, for PCT Application Search No. PCT/US04/05501, 2 Pages.
Written Opinion of the Internatioanl Preliminary Examining Authority mailed Nov. 30, 2005 for PCT/US03/41526, 5 pages.
Valencia Martin-Wallace. International Search Report. Jul. 20, 2005. 6 pages.
Written Opinion mailed Nov. 30, 2005 for PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US03/41526, 5 pages.
Breiman, Friedman, Olshen, and Stone. “Classification and Regression Trees.” Wadsworth & Brooks, Monterey, CA (1984).
Quinlan. “C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning.” Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA (1993).
Hayes, Brian. “Spam, Spam, Spam, Lovely Spam.” American Scientist Online, Jun. 30, 2003. pp. 1-6. vol. 91.
Partial European Search Report, EP05100847, mailed Jun. 21, 2005, 5 pages.
European Search Report, dated Jun. 9, 2005, mailed Aug. 22, 2005 for European Patent Application Serial No. EP04011978, 12 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/208,150, filed Jul. 29, 2002, Kristian Andaker.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/893,941, filed Jun. 28, 2001, Horvitz et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/278,591, filed Oct. 23, 2002, Heckerman et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/180,565, filed Jun. 26, 2002, Goodman et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/497,992, filed Feb. 4, 2000, Maller.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/291,260, filed Nov. 8, 2002, Burrows et al.
Yu Wu, et al., A New Anti-Spam Filter Based on Data Mining and Analysis of Email Security, Conference Proceedings of the SPIE, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Theory, Tools and Technology V, vol. 5098, Apr. 21, 2003, pp. 147-154, Orlando, FL, USA.
Massey, B., et al., Learning Spam: Simple Techniques for Freely-Available Software Proceedings of Freenix Track 2003 Usenix Annual Technical Conference, Online!, Jun. 9, 2003, pp. 63-76, Berkley, CA, USA.
Graham, P., The Future of Spam, Computer Security Journal, CSI Computer Security Institute, vol. 19, No. 1, Jan. 2003, pp. 1-5.
Graham, P., A Plan for Spam, Online!, Aug. 2002, XP002273602, http://www.paulgraham.com/spam.html, retrieved on Mar. 12, 2004.
European Search Report, EP31087TE900, mailed Nov. 11, 2004.
J. Byrne, My Spamblock, Google, Jan. 19, 1997, 2 pages.
D. F. Skoll, How to Make Sure a Human is Sending You Mail, Google, Nov. 17, 1996, 2 pages.
L. M. Bowman, Hotmail Spam Filters Block Outgoing E-Mail, CNET NEWS.COM, Jan. 18, 2001, 3 pages.
Thorsten Joachims, Transductive Inference for Text Classification Using Support Vector Machines, In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Machine Learning, 1999, pp. 200-209, San Francisco, USA.
Kevin R. Gee, Using Latent Semantic Indexing to Filter Spam, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Texas-Arlington, 5 pages, 2003.
Fabrizio Sebastiani. Machine Learning in Automated Text Categorization. ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 34 Issue 1, pp. 1-47, 2002.
I. Androutsopoulos, et al. Learning to Filter Spam E-mail: A Comparison of a Naive Bayesian and a Memory-based Approach. 4th PKDD's Workshop on Machine Learning and Textual Information Access, 2000. 13 pages.
I. Androutsopoulos,et al., An Experimental Comparison of Naive Bayesian and Keyword-based Anti-spam Filtering with Personal E-mail Messages. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGIR Conference, pp. 160-167, 2000.
P. Pantel, et al., SpamCop: A Spam Classification & Organization Program. In Proc. AAAI-1998

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Adaptive junk message filtering system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Adaptive junk message filtering system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Adaptive junk message filtering system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3813564

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.