Pulse or digital communications – Equalizers – Automatic
Reexamination Certificate
1998-12-22
2004-02-17
Tse, Young T. (Department: 2634)
Pulse or digital communications
Equalizers
Automatic
C375S231000, C348S726000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06693958
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention concerns adaptive channel equalization of a signal which may contain high definition television information.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The recovery of data from modulated signals conveying digital information in symbol form usually requires three functions at a receiver: timing recovery for symbol synchronization, carrier recovery (frequency demodulation to baseband), and channel equalization. Timing recovery is a process by which a receiver clock (timebase) is synchronized to a transmitter clock. This permits the received signal to be sampled at the optimum point in time to reduce the chance of a slicing error associated with decision-directed processing of received symbol values. Carrier recovery is a process by which a received RF signal, after being frequency down converted to a lower intermediate frequency passband (eg., near baseband), is frequency shifted to baseband to permit recovery of the modulating baseband information.
Many digital data communications systems employ adaptive equalization to compensate for the effects of changing channel conditions and disturbances on the signal transmission channel. The equalization process estimates the transfer function of the transmission channel and applies the inverse of the transfer function to the received signal so as to reduce or eliminate the distortion effects. Channel equalization typically employs filters that remove from a received signal amplitude and phase distortions resulting from a frequency dependent time variant response of the transmission channel, for example, to thereby provide improved symbol decision capability. Equalization removes baseband intersymbol interference (ISI) caused by transmission channel disturbances including the low pass filtering effect of the transmission channel. ISI causes the value of a given symbol to be distorted by the values of preceding and following symbols, and essentially represents symbol “ghosts” since ISI includes advanced and delayed symbols with respect to a reference symbol location in a given decision region.
An adaptive equalizer is essentially an adaptive digital filter. In systems using an adaptive equalizer, it is necessary to provide a method of adapting the filter response so as to adequately compensate for channel distortions. Several algorithms are available for adapting the filter coefficients and thereby the filter response. One widely used method employs the Least Mean Squares (LMS) algorithm. In this algorithm, by varying coefficient values as a function of a representative error signal, the equalizer output signal is forced to approximate a reference data sequence. This error signal is formed by subtracting the equalizer output signal from the reference data sequence. As the error signal approaches zero, the equalizer approaches convergence whereby the equalizer output signal and the reference data sequence are approximately equal.
When the equalizer operation is initiated, the coefficient values (filter tap weights) are usually not set at values which produce adequate compensation of channel distortions. In order to force initial convergence of the equalizer coefficients, a known “training” signal may be used as the reference signal. Training signals, eg., a pseudorandom number (PN) sequence, have been used extensively in telecommunications devices such as television receivers and telephone modems. A major benefit of employing a known PN sequence training signal in the transmission is that errors can be accurately obtained, and the equalizer can be trained to equalize the transmission channel before and during transmitting and receiving data.
The training signal is programmed at both the transmitter and receiver. The error signal is formed at the receiver by subtracting a locally generated receiver copy of the training signal from the output of the adaptive equalizer. The training signal helps to open the initially occluded “eye” characteristic of the received signal, as known. After adaption with the training signal, the “eye” has opened considerably and the equalizer is switched to a decision-directed operating mode. In this mode final convergence of the filter tap weights is achieved by using the actual values of symbols from the output of the equalizer instead of using the training signal. The decision directed equalizing mode is capable of tracking and cancelling time varying channel distortions more rapidly than methods using periodically transmitted training signals. In order for decision directed equalization to provide reliable convergence and stable coefficient values, approximately 90% of the decisions must be correct. The training signal helps the equalizer achieve this 90% correct decision level.
In some systems, “blind” equalization is used to provide initial convergence of the equalizer coefficient values and to force the eye to open. In the blind mode, filter coefficients are coarsely adjusted in response to an error signal which is calculated by employing a known function, or algorithm. Among the most popular blind equalization algorithms are the Constant Modulus Algorithm (CMA) and the Reduced Constellation Algorithm (RCA). These algorithms are discussed, for example, in Proakis,
Digital Communications
, McGraw-Hill: New York, 1989 and in Godard, Self-Recovering Equalization and Carrier Tracking in Two Dimensional Data Communication Systems,”
IEEE Transactions on Communications
, November 1980. Briefly, the CMA relies on the fact that, at the decision instants, the modulus of the detected data symbols should lie on a locus of points defining one of several (constellation) circles of different diameters. The RCA relies on forming “super constellations” within the main transmitted constellation. The data signal is first forced to fit into a super constellation, then the super constellation is subdivided to include the entire constellation.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the principles of the present invention, faster equalization is achieved by recycling received training data through an equalizer. In the case of a high definition television receiver for processing a VSB modulated signal, training data is recycled several times within a data field interval between field sync intervals.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5473321 (1995-12-01), Goodman et al.
patent: 5475444 (1995-12-01), Kim
patent: 5572547 (1996-11-01), Citta et al.
patent: 5592235 (1997-01-01), Park et al.
patent: 5619269 (1997-04-01), Lee et al.
patent: 5684827 (1997-11-01), Nielsen
patent: 5841484 (1998-11-01), Hulyalkar et al.
patent: 5878086 (1999-03-01), Hulyalkar
patent: 5886748 (1999-03-01), Lee
patent: 5955618 (1999-09-01), Kim
patent: 2 309 140 (1997-07-01), None
patent: 8-1865223 (1996-07-01), None
W. Bretl, et al., entitled VSB Modem Subsystem Design for Grand Alliance Digital Television Receivers, published Jun. 12, 1995, pp. 773-786, US.
Grand Alliance HDTV System Specification, Apr. 14, 1994, entire specification.
D'Souza Adolf
Shiue Dong-Chang
Wang Tian Jun
Kurdyla Ronald H.
Laks Joseph J.
Thomson Licensing S.A.
Tripoli Joseph S.
Tse Young T.
LandOfFree
Adaptive channel equalizer having a training mode does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Adaptive channel equalizer having a training mode, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Adaptive channel equalizer having a training mode will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3302813