Actuators for microfluidics without moving parts

Chemistry: electrical and wave energy – Apparatus – Electrophoretic or electro-osmotic apparatus

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C204S672000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06565727

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to the fields of laboratory automation, microfabrication and manipulation of small volumes of fluids (microfluidics), in such a manner so as to enable rapid dispensing and manipulation of small isolated volumes of fluids under direct electronic control. More specifically, the invention relates to a method of forming and moving individual droplets of electrically conductive liquid, and devices for carrying out this method.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Miniaturization of assays in analytical biochemistry is a direct result of the need to collect maximum data from a sample of a limited volume. This miniaturization, in turn, requires methods of rapid and automatic dispensing and manipulation of small volumes of liquids (solvents, reagents, samples etc.) The two methods currently employed for such manipulation are, 1) ink jetting and 2) electromigration methods in capillary channels: electroosmosis, elecrophoresis and/or combination thereof. Both methods suffer poor reproducibility.
Ink jetting is based on dispensing droplets of liquid through a nozzle. Droplet expulsion from the nozzle is effected by a pressure pulse in the reservoir connected to the nozzle. The pressure pulse itself is effected by an electric signal. The droplets are subsequently deposited on a solid surface opposing the nozzle. The relative position of the nozzle and the surface is controlled by a mechanical device, resulting in deposition of droplets in a desired pattern. Removal of the droplets is typically effected by either washing or spinning (centrifugal forces).
While ink jetting is a dispensing method generally applicable to a wide variety of liquids, the volume of the deposited droplets is not very stable. It depends on both the nature of the liquid being deposited (viscosity, density, vapor pressure, surface tension) and the environment in the gap between the surface and the nozzle (temperature, humidity). Ink jetting technology does not provide means to manipulate droplets after they have been deposited on the surface, except for removing them.
Electromigration methods are based on mobility of ions in liquids when electric current is passed through the liquids. Because different ions have different mobilities in the electric field, the composition of liquid being manipulated generally changes as it is being transported. While this feature of electromigration methods is, useful for analytical purposes, because it allows physical separation of components of mixtures, it is undesirable in general micromanipulation techniques.
Additionally, the need to pass electrical current through the liquid results in heating of the liquid, which may cause undesirable chemical reactions or even boiling. To avoid this, the electrical conductivities of all liquids in the system are kept low, limiting the applicability of electromigration methods.
The need to pass electrical current through the liquid also requires that the control electrodes be electrically connected through an uninterrupted body of conductive liquid. This requirement additionally complicates precision dispensing and results in ineffective use of reagents, because the metered doses of a liquid are isolated from a continuous flow of that liquid from one electrode to another.
Additionally, ions present in the liquid alter the electric field in that liquid. Therefore, changes in ionic composition in the liquid being manipulated result in variations in resultant distribution of flow and material for the same sequence of control electrical signals.
Finally, the devices for carrying out the electromigration methods have connected channels (capillaries), which are used to define liquid flow paths in the device. Because the sizes of these capillaries and connections among them are optimized for certain types of manipulations, and also for certain types of liquids, these devices are very specialized.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides microchip laboratory systems and methods of using these systems so that complex chemical and biochemical procedures can be conducted on a microchip under electronic control. The microchip laboratory system comprises a material handling device that transports liquid in the form of individual droplets positioned between two substantially parallel, flat surfaces. Optional devices for forming the droplets are also provided.
The formation and movement of droplets are precisely controlled by plurality of electric fields across the gap between the two surfaces. These fields are controlled by applying voltages to plurality of electrodes positioned on the opposite sides of the gap. The electrodes are substantially planar and positioned on the surfaces facing the gap. At least some of the electrodes are electrically insulated from the liquid in the gap.
The gap is filled with a filler fluid substantially immiscible with the liquids which are to be manipulated. The filler fluid is substantially non-conductive. The wetting properties of the surfaces facing inside the gap are controlled, by the choice of materials contacting the liquids or chemical modification of these materials, so that at least one of these surfaces is preferentially wettable by the filler fluid rather than any of the liquids which are to be manipulated.
The operating principle of the devices is known as electrowetting. If a droplet of polar conductive liquid is placed on a hydrophobic surface, application of electric potential across the liquid-solid interface reduces the contact angle, effectively converting the surface into more hydrophilic. According to the present invention, the electric fields effecting the hydrophobic-hydrophilic conversion are controlled by applying an electrical potential to electrodes arranged as an array on at least one side of the gap. The electrodes on the other side may or may not be arranged in a similar array; in the preferred embodiment, there is array of electrodes only on one side of the gap, while the other has only one large electrode covering substantially the entire area of the device.
At least on one side of the gap, the electrodes are coated with an insulator. The insulator material is chosen so that it is chemically resistant to the liquids to be manipulated in the device, as well as the filler fluid.
By applying an electrical potential to an electrode or a group of electrodes adjacent to an area contacted by polar liquid, the hydrophobic surface on top of these electrodes is converted to hydrophilic and the polar liquid is pulled by the surface tension gradient (Marangoni effect) so as to maximize the area overlap with the charged group of electrodes.
By removing an electric potential from an electrode positioned between the extremities of an elongated body of polar liquid, the portion of formerly hydrophilic surface corresponding to that electrode is made hydrophobic. The gradient of surface tension in this case acts to separate the elongated body of liquid into two separate bodies, each surrounded by a phase boundary. Thus, individual droplets of polar liquid can be formed by alternatively applying and removing an electric potential to electrodes. The droplets can be subsequently repositioned within the device as discussed above.
Examples of appropriate coating materials include SiN and BN, deposited by any of the conventional thin-film deposition methods (sputtering, evaporation, or preferably chemical vapor deposition) and parylene™, deposited by pyrolytic process, spin-on glasses (SOGs) and polymer coatings (polyimides, polymethylmetacrylates and their copolymers, etc.), dip- and spray-deposited polymer coatings, as well as polymer films (Teflon™, polyimides etc.) applied by lamination.


REFERENCES:
patent: 4418346 (1983-11-01), Batchelder
patent: 4582391 (1986-04-01), Legrand
patent: 4636785 (1987-01-01), Le Pesant
patent: 4701021 (1987-10-01), Le Pesant
patent: 5181016 (1993-01-01), Lee
patent: 5472577 (1995-12-01), Porter
patent: 5571410 (1996-11-01), Swedberg
patent: 5731792 (1998-03-01), Sheridon
patent: 5980719 (1999-11-01), Cherukuri
patent: 5

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Actuators for microfluidics without moving parts does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Actuators for microfluidics without moving parts, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Actuators for microfluidics without moving parts will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3085544

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.