Power plants – Combustion products used as motive fluid – Combined with regulation of power output feature
Patent
1992-08-20
1995-07-11
Casaregola, Louis J.
Power plants
Combustion products used as motive fluid
Combined with regulation of power output feature
60725, 415119, F02C 900
Patent
active
054310083
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to active control systems for increasing the performance of machines by active control techniques applied to the inlet or outlet systems. The invention may also be applied to reduce radiated noise from the machine whilst operating.
BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION
The efficiency and performance of internal combustion engines has been the focus of a great deal of attention over the years. There are many parameters which affect the performance of an engine whether it be two-stroke, four-stroke, petrol or Diesel, of normal reciprocating type or of one of its derivatives such as a Wankel engine.
One feature of all internal combustion engines is the need to draw fuel and air into a combustion chamber and to expel burnt gases after combustion has taken place. Apart from the design of the mechanical components such as valves, pistons and combustion chambers, the shape of the inlet and exhaust manifolds has been shown to be important. This is because the shape affects the pressure difference between the combustion chamber and the inlet or exhaust. It is this pressure difference which forces the air/fuel mixture into the chamber, or the burnt gases out of the chamber. The function of turbo-chargers and superchargers, for example, is to increase the pressure in the inlet. The pressure difference between the combustion chamber and inlet or exhaust varies with time throughout the cycle of the engine, and so the complete time histories of the pressure differences can effect engine performance, and not just their time averages, for example.
The design of exhaust pipes and inlet systems is also constrained by the requirement that they must reduce the sound radiated from the engine to acceptable levels. This requirement is becoming increasingly stringent and is often in conflict with the desire for good performance and efficiency.
The `tuning` of exhaust pipes, especially for two stroke engines, is a way of influencing the unsteady pressure in the exhaust but, since the tuning is achieved by the fixed exhaust geometry, the tuning cannot be effective at all engine speeds.
Over the last twenty years there has been a development of active control systems which can be applied to reduce the sound radiated from the end of exhaust pipes. These control systems work by reflecting the sound wave in the pipe back towards the engine. They allow shorter and more direct pipes to be used and so affect the efficiency of the engine under some operating conditions, however they can induce strong acoustic resonances in the exhaust pipe which can lead to increased noise radiation from the walls of the pipe.
The use of two actuators to absorb the sound in a pipe rather than to reflect it is known. However, the technique uses a single channel control system and relies on using actuators with a matched response. It is not suitable for practical applications where the response of the individual actuators can vary over a period of time.
There are other machines which have inlet and outlet systems and whose performance is affected by the dynamic pressures in those systems. Examples include gas compressors (which include screw, tooth, reciprocating and centrifugal types), pumps, turbo-machines etc. The performance of these can be measured in different ways (such as mass flow rate, power output, efficiency etc) and, as with internal combustion engines, there is often a conflicting requirement for noise reduction.
DISCUSSION OF SELECTED THE PRIOR ART
The attenuation of sound radiated from the open end of an exhaust pipe by the use of active control is known. In such systems, a loudspeaker upstream of the exit is used to generate an `anti-sound` which, in fact, reflects the sound travelling down the exhaust pipe back towards the engine, thereby preventing the sound from being radiated at the exit. A microphone at the exit is used to monitor the sound there, and its signal is processed to adapt the loudspeaker signal in order to maintain silence at the exit as engine speed or conditions change.
One disadv
REFERENCES:
patent: 3936606 (1976-02-01), Wanke
patent: 4557106 (1985-12-01), Williams et al.
patent: 4805733 (1989-02-01), Kato et al.
patent: 4967550 (1990-11-01), Acton et al.
Patent Abstracts of Japan vol. 10 No. 246 (M-510) 2302 23 Aug. 1986 and JP-A-61 76721 (Mazda) 19 Apr. 1986.
Adaptive systens in Control and Signal Processing Jul. 1986, Pergamon Press Oxford KJ Ostrom "A stochastic gradient algorithm for multichannel active sound control" pp. 329-333 (cited in the application).
Patent Abstracts of Japan vol. 12, No. 315 (M-735) 3162 26 Aug. 1988, and JP-A-63 85217 (Masashi Tsuchida) 15 Apr. 1988.
Patent Abstracts of Japan vol. 013 No. 41 (M-791) (3389) 30 Jan. 1989 and JP-A-63 248918 (Mazda) 17 Oct. 1988.
Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 013 No. 330 (-E-793) 25 Jul. 1989, and JP-A-1 036911 (Sankei KoGYO) 07 Feb. 1989.
Patent Abstracts of Japan vol. 9 No. 70 (M-367 1793 30 Mar. 1985, and JP-A-59 201915 (Hino Jidosha Kogyo) 15 Nov. 1984.
Eatwell Graham P.
Langley Andrew J.
Ross Colin F.
Casaregola Louis J.
Hiney James W.
Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc.
LandOfFree
Active control of machine performance does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Active control of machine performance, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Active control of machine performance will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-495591