Electrical audio signal processing systems and devices – Electro-acoustic audio transducer – Electromagnetic
Reexamination Certificate
2001-02-21
2004-04-13
Tran, Sinh (Department: 2643)
Electrical audio signal processing systems and devices
Electro-acoustic audio transducer
Electromagnetic
C381S400000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06721435
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to acoustic loudspeakers.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
To provide the greatest listening pleasure, an acoustic loudspeaker system should strive to meet several basic requirements. First, it must be capable of reproducing very low frequencies, typically below 30 Hz, that are felt and not heard. Second, it must be capable of reproducing overtones of high musical notes. Third, it should have a relatively flat frequency and phase response over the full range of human audible frequencies, from about 20 Hz to about 20,000 Hz in order to reproduce sound with fidelity to the source. Fourth, also to be faithful to the source, the system should recreate whatever spatial illusions are contained in the source material. For example, most music sources are encoded for stereo reproduction using two channels. Two, spatially separated and phase-synchronous infinitesimal point sources of acoustic energy theoretically provide the best stereo imaging. These types of sources are able to create the illusion of sound originating from any point along a line extending through both point sources. Therefore, a loudspeaker system for stereo encoded audio sources should imitate as closely as possible two infinitesimally small point sources of acoustic energy. Fifth, to accommodate wide dynamic ranges, a loudspeaker system must be able to handle signals with power sufficient to reproduce low frequencies at loud volumes without distortion to the sound or damage to the speaker.
Conventional belief is that a single acoustic driver cannot deliver a frequency range and power handling capability required for high fidelity sound reproduction demanded by audiophiles. Characteristics of a transducer that optimize it for high frequency sound reproduction are often opposite of those that are optimum for a driver for low frequency reproduction. Therefore, most loudspeaker systems rely on two or more acoustic transducers or drivers per channel. Each driver of a channel is responsible for reproducing sounds in only in certain portions of the audible range. By utilizing multiple drivers per channel, each driver may be optimized to operate within a selected portion of the acoustic range. An electrical circuit, known as a cross-over network, splits portions of the energy of the input signal between the drivers based on its frequency and feeds it to the different driver.
Despite their widespread acceptance, multi-driver speakers have several drawbacks. First, cross-over networks distort the electrical sound signal, thus introducing distortion into the sound reproduced by the loudspeaker system. For example, cross-over networks naturally cause phase distortion in incoming signals: higher frequencies will be phase shifted with respect to the lower frequencies. Phase shifting results in a loss of imaging information, causing the music to sound “muddy.” Cross-over networks therefore sometimes employ circuits to correct phase distortion. These cross-over networks will often introduce other types of distortion and possess non-linear responses. Second, multi-driver speaker systems tend to be larger and have more components, thus making them more expensive, bulkier and less mobile. Third, a multi-driver speaker does not satisfactorily represent a point source of acoustic radiation for a single channel, as a channel is obviously radiating from multiple points. Thus, they cannot achieve the best stereo imaging.
Despite the motivation for creating a broadband acoustic driver, the problems of using a single driver to reproduce at equal levels high notes with clarity and low notes with physical impact have been difficult to overcome.
A conventional acoustic transducer has a relatively stiff or rigid diaphragm which reciprocates along a linear axis. For reproducing low frequencies, the diaphragm has preferably a concave, cone shape. For high frequencies, it may be flat or convex. To vibrate the diaphragm, an electrical signal representing the sound wave to be reproduced flows through a coil mechanically connected to the diaphragm. The coil is situated within a fixed magnetic field, causing the coil to reciprocate with changes in the current. The coil is formed from one or more lengths of wire wrapped around a support structure. Typically, the edges of the diaphragm are attached to a basket shaped frame using a compliant, slightly resilient, material. The coil is centered within a gap referred to as a “flux gap,” formed between cylindrically shaped pole and a donut-shaped magnet assembly.
To provide the most accurate sound reproduction, the movement of the coil in response to the electrical signal and the coupling of the movement of the diaphragm to the air in response to the movement of the coil must be linear. Unfortunately, the responses of these elements to the sound signal are rarely totally linear, especially over the entire audible range. The diaphragm couples the mechanical energy of the moving coil to the air, thereby causing the air to vibrate and setting up acoustic waves. At lower frequencies, the diaphragm can be thought of as behaving like a simple mechanical piston pushing volumes of air. At low frequencies, a lot of power is required to push large volumes of air, particularly at loud volumes. Therefore, to sound low notes with great volume a speaker must be capable of handling a lot of power, particularly the mechanical stresses from the strong electromagnetic forces and resulting heat.
For good low frequency response, a driver is needed which is mechanically strong and powerful in order to move larger amounts of air. Thus, a stiffer diaphragm with a large surface area is preferred. However, a large, stiff diaphragm means more structure, and thus more mass. More mass means less efficiency, and thus more power to reproduce the same loudness. More power means that a more massive coil is required to handle the mechanical and thermal stresses resulting from the power. However, more mass in the moving parts inhibits the driver's ability to reciprocate at higher frequencies. Also, it is more difficult to control coupling of the movement of the coil to the air through a large diaphragm and its natural resonances. A smaller diaphragm could be used to sound bass notes, but a longer throw or stroke of the coil would be required to move the same amount of air. However, a longer stroke necessitates either a magnetic field of greater magnitude or a longer coil in order to provide a sufficiently high electromotive force (EMF). Furthermore, a greater coil length means greater induction. Thus, the length of the coil is limited. A long stroke also requires the coil to move at a higher velocity. Higher velocities will create a higher back EMF, which resists travel of the coil and ultimately limits the ability of the driver to reproduce low frequencies.
At higher frequencies, the diaphragm behaves more like a radiating transmission line. The rapid vibrations of the coil cause not only linear movement of the diaphragm, but also mechanical vibrations in the diaphragm which radiate from the points where the coil is attached, outwardly to the edge of the diaphragm. Depending on the material, size of the diaphragm and how it is attached to the suspension, these vibrations may resonate at certain audible frequencies, thus adversely affecting the linearity of the coupling of the mechanical movement of the coil to the air. Although there may be mechanical deformation of the diaphragm at all frequencies, at high frequencies the effect of resonant vibrations will have a substantial impact on the sound, with certain frequencies being noticeably enhanced and others degraded. Reproducing a high frequency sound also requires the coil to be quickly accelerated. Thus, a near zero mass coil and diaphragm is theoretically ideal. Furthermore, a smaller diameter diaphragm is preferred. A larger diameter diaphragm tends to be more directional, exacerbating the directional nature of high frequencies.
Attempts have been made to accommodate the demands of high and low frequencies in a single, broad band acoustic dri
Babb Alan J.
Babb Burton A.
Babb Laboratories
Hubbard Marc A.
Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr P.C.
Tran Sinh
LandOfFree
Acoustic loudspeaker with energy absorbing bearing and voice... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Acoustic loudspeaker with energy absorbing bearing and voice..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Acoustic loudspeaker with energy absorbing bearing and voice... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3236232