Pulse or digital communications – Receivers – Interference or noise reduction
Patent
1995-05-23
1998-01-20
Chin, Stephen
Pulse or digital communications
Receivers
Interference or noise reduction
375349, H04L 2706
Patent
active
057107971
ABSTRACT:
A single transducer digital communication receiver is described which is capable of extracting the data bits of at least one desired signal in the presence of interfering signals of similar type. The present invention also seeks to provide a communication system in which overlapping transmissions are tolerated and allowed. The present invention describes a design for a digital communication system, according to a specific frequency plan, which includes an appropriate digital demodulator that extracts the data bits of the desired signal(s) in the presence of closely spaced signals. The present invention enables reduced channel spacing in digital communication systems and thereby increases the system capacity (i.e. the number of users per bandwidth unit) without incurring any significant loss in system performance (e.g. power margins, BER, and channel availability). It also allows a reduced power margin that is required to maintain a pre-specified performance level without sacrificing system capacity. These two factors, power margin and system capacity, play a central role in the design and construction of state-of-the-art digital communication systems which seek to pack more users on the same frequency band without incurring significant power loss. Thus, the present invention also provides a method and apparatus for upgrading existing systems such as a cellular system for mobile wireless communications that is based on the IS-54 or the GSM standard.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5363407 (1994-11-01), Ramesh et al.
patent: 5430894 (1995-07-01), Nohara et al.
patent: 5469465 (1995-11-01), Birchler et al.
patent: 5537443 (1996-07-01), Yoshimo et al.
F Amoroso, "Pulse and Spectrum Manipulation in the Minimum (Frequency) Shift Keying (MSK) Format", IEEE Transactions on Communications, 381-384, (Mar. 1976).
O Andrisano, et al., "Adjacent Channel and Cochannel Interferences in CPFSK Systems with Nonlinear Transmitters and Limited-Discriminator Detection", IEEE Transaction on Communications, 36, 544-552, (May 1988).
O Andrisano, et al., "On the Spectral Efficiency of CPM Systems Over Real Channel in the Presence of Adjacent Channel and Cochannel Interference: A Comparison Between Partial and Full Response Systems", IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 39, 89-100, (May 1990).
N. Arne, et al., "Error Probability Analysis for Continuous Phase Modulation with Viterbi Detection on a Gaussian Channel with Multiple Signal Interference", IEEE Transactions on Communications, 37, 230-237, (1989).
S Arne, "Improved Error Probability Analysis for CPM with Linear Detection on Gaussian and Rayleigh Fading Channels with interfering Signals", Technical Report TR-204, 1-61, (Jan. 16, 1987).
R E Eaves, et al., "Optimization of Quadrature-Carrier Modulation for Low Crosstalk and Close Packing of Users", IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-27, 176-185, (Jan. 1979).
S A Gronemeyer, et al., "MSK and Offset QPSK Modulation", IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-24, 809-820, (Aug. 1976).
I Kalet, "A Look at Crosstalk in Quadrature-Carrier Modulation Systems", IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-25, 884-892, (Sep. 1977).
I Kalet, "Adjacent Channel Interference in Continuous Phase Modulation (CPM)", 1-36.
I Kalet, et al., "Suboptimal Continuous Shift Keyed (CSK) Demodulation for The Efficient Implementation of Low Crosstalk Data Communication", IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-25, 1037-1041, (Sep. 1977).
I Korn, "Simple Expression for Interchannel and Intersymbol Interference Degradation in MSK Systems with Application to Systems with Gaussian Filters", IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-30, 1968-1972, (Aug. 1982).
D H Morais, et al., "Bandwidth Efficiency and Probability of Error Performance of MSK and Offset QPSK Systems", IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-27, 1794-1801, (Dec. 1979).
D H Morais, et al., "The Effects of Filtering and Limited on the Performance of QPSK, Offset QPSK, and MSK Systems", IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-28, 1999-1981 (Dec. 1980).
S. Pasupathy, "Minimum Shift Keying: A Spectrally Efficient Modulation, Compact Power Spectrum, Good Error Rate Performance, and Easy Synchronization Make MSK an Attractive Digital Modulation Technique", IEEE Communications Magazine, 14-22, (Jul. 1979).
B R Petersen, et al., "Suppression of Adjacent-Channel, Cochannel, and Intersymbol Interface by Equalizer and Linear Combiners", IEEE Transactions on Communications, 42, 3109-3118, (Dec. 1994).
M Rabzel, et al., "Spectral Shaping in Minimum Shift Keying (MSK)-Type Signals", IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-26,, 189-195, (Jan. 1978).
B Reiffen, et al., "On Low Crosstalk Data Communication and its Realization by Continuous-Frequency Modulation Schemes", IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-26, 131-135, (Jan. 1978).
R B Rhodes, Jr., et al., "MSK-Type Reception of Continuous Phase Modualation: Cochannel and Adjacent Channel Interference", IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-35, 185-193, (Feb 1987).
M K Simon, "A Generalizatin of Minimum-Shift-Keying (MSK)-Type Signaling Based Upon Input Data Symbol Pulse Shaping", IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-24, 845-856 (Aug. 1976).
V Varma, et al., "Adjacent Channel Interference in Partial Response Continuous Phase Modulatin Systems with MSK-Type Receivers", 5 pages.
V Varma, et al., "Error Performance of Partial Response CPM in the Presence of Adjacent Channel Interference and Gaussian Noise", IEEE, 31.4 1-31.4.5, (1986).
V Varma, et al., "Performance of Partial Response CPM in the Presence of Adjacent Channel Interference and Gaussian Noise", IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-34, 1123-1131, (Nov. 1986).
B E White, "A Worst-Case Comparison Among Several Modulation Schemes", IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-25, 1032-1040, (Sep. 1977).
Segal Mordechai
Shalvi Ofir
Chin Stephen
Kim Kevim
LIBIT Signal Processing Inc.
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for digital communication in the presence o does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for digital communication in the presence o, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for digital communication in the presence o will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-731147