Positively driven elastomeric tracked work vehicle

Wheel substitutes for land vehicles – With interposed friction drive belt

Patent

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

305 38, 305 56, 305 11, B62D 55088

Patent

active

053520297

DESCRIPTION:

BRIEF SUMMARY
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to a track laying vehicle and to apparatus and devices suitable for use in such a vehicle.
The track laying vehicle may be of the type comprising a main body having a longitudinal axis extending between its forward and rearward ends, a pair of track assemblies each disposed on opposite sides of the main body with each assembly comprising first and second wheels which are spaced apart in the direction of the longitudinal axis with at least one of the wheels defining a drive wheel.
There have been many attempts over the years to combine the advantages of tracks with the mobility and speed of pneumatic tires. A work vehicle using tracks converts more efficiently the engine power to pulling power than tires when worked on soft and/or loose surfaces. There is also less slippage and less compaction when comparing a tracked work vehicle and a rubber tired vehicle with the same weight to power ratio working on the same surface.
For many years, steel tracks have been the accepted form of tracks for a pulling and/or work vehicle, because they utilize a positive and mechanical drive between the drive wheel and the ground engaging track. However, steel tracks are generally limited to much lower maximum speeds because of their weight and wear characteristics. Steel tracks also have a relatively high noise level, higher initial cost and cannot be used on improved road surfaces without causing unacceptable damage. The high cost of repair to the joints of the steel track make them unacceptable for high speed applications. There have been many attempts to successfully use an elastomeric or rubber belt entrained around a driven wheel and an idler wheel to enable a tracked vehicle to work at higher speeds and retain the traction and flotation of steel tracks.
Previous inventions generally fall into two categories, positively driven belts and frictionally driven belts.
Many previous designs of positively driven elastomeric or rubber tracks have used two continuous belts joined laterally by inflexible ground engaging cross bars to provide a "chain and sprocket" type drive and to give lateral stiffness to the rubber track.
Still other positive drive tracks have used rubber belts with multiple rows of segments running longitudinally and protruding inwardly on the belt with opposite segments of each row being joined by an inflexible cross member to provide positive drive, and lateral engagement to the driving wheel and idler.
While many of these positive drive tracks achieve a certain amount of success, they are costly and complicated to manufacture, and have low levels of tolerance to debris ingestion and would tend to "clog up" when used in many farming applications.
Other attempts to use elastomeric or rubber tracks have been made by way of a frictional drive between the drive wheel and the belt by tensioning the idler wheel away from the drive wheel. Many of the friction drive systems have a dual purpose driving/guiding structure in the form of a "V" and running longitudinally on the inside of the belt to provide a guiding and driving means similar to a V-belt drive. The driving and guide grooves of the drive wheels, for this type of frictional drive, tend to accumulate a high level of debris and lose frictional drive through a lack of engagement on the side surfaces.
A more recent patent has been a frictional drive using flat lateral driving surfaces of the drive wheel and belt with a "dual wheel" drive and tensioning idler to accommodate guiding lugs extending inwardly on the belt which limits lateral movement between the wheels and the belt. This system relies heavily on a highly tensioned belt, which is at least eight hundred and fifty Newtons per lateral centimeter of belt, to maintain frictional drive.
There are a number of disadvantages with this type of frictional drive.
Firstly there is a significant level of parasitic power loss caused by the highly tensioned belt.
Breaking force and reverse thrust of the vehicle by means of the drive wheel is limited to,

REFERENCES:
patent: Re32442 (1987-06-01), Satzler
patent: 1539582 (1925-05-01), Landry
patent: 1542149 (1925-06-01), Landry
patent: 1673541 (1928-06-01), Wilson
patent: 1852197 (1932-04-01), Wilson
patent: 1968043 (1934-07-01), Knox et al.
patent: 2025999 (1935-12-01), Myers
patent: 2302658 (1942-11-01), Artz
patent: 2461849 (1949-02-01), Slemmons et al.
patent: 2535254 (1950-12-01), Attwell
patent: 2793150 (1957-05-01), Deaves
patent: 2854294 (1958-09-01), Bannister
patent: 3017942 (1962-01-01), Gamaunt
patent: 3072443 (1963-01-01), Yoe
patent: 3451728 (1969-06-01), Bruneau
patent: 3472563 (1969-10-01), Irgens
patent: 3510174 (1970-05-01), Lamb
patent: 3582154 (1971-06-01), Russ, Sr.
patent: 3597017 (1971-08-01), Tamaka et al.
patent: 3722962 (1973-03-01), Cooper
patent: 3734576 (1973-05-01), Heiple et al.
patent: 3758169 (1973-09-01), Trapp
patent: 3900231 (1975-08-01), Ohm
patent: 4093318 (1978-06-01), Edwards
patent: 4145092 (1979-03-01), Kasin
patent: 4218932 (1980-08-01), McComber
patent: 4221272 (1980-09-01), Kell
patent: 4281882 (1981-08-01), van der Lely
patent: 4469379 (1984-09-01), Kotyuk, Jr.
patent: 4519654 (1985-05-01), Satzler et al.
patent: 4537267 (1985-08-01), Satzler
patent: 4569561 (1986-02-01), Edwards et al.
patent: 4616883 (1986-10-01), Edwards et al.
patent: 4681177 (1987-07-01), Zborowski
patent: 4844560 (1989-07-01), Edwards et al.
patent: 4861120 (1989-08-01), Edwards et al.
patent: 4884852 (1989-12-01), Edwards et al.
patent: 4906054 (1990-03-01), Edwards et al.
patent: 5058963 (1991-10-01), Wiesner et al.
patent: 5145242 (1992-09-01), Togashi

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Positively driven elastomeric tracked work vehicle does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Positively driven elastomeric tracked work vehicle, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Positively driven elastomeric tracked work vehicle will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-577403

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.