Methods of defining ontologies, word disambiguation methods,...

Data processing: speech signal processing – linguistics – language – Linguistics – Natural language

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C704S007000, C704S010000

Reexamination Certificate

active

08036876

ABSTRACT:
Methods of defining ontologies, word disambiguation methods, computer systems, and articles of manufacture are described according to some aspects. In one aspect, a word disambiguation method includes accessing textual content to be disambiguated, wherein the textual content comprises a plurality of words individually comprising a plurality of word senses, for an individual word of the textual content, identifying one of the word senses of the word as indicative of the meaning of the word in the textual content, for the individual word, selecting one of a plurality of event classes of a lexical database ontology using the identified word sense of the individual word, and for the individual word, associating the selected one of the event classes with the textual content to provide disambiguation of a meaning of the individual word in the textual content.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5794050 (1998-08-01), Dahlgren et al.
patent: 6260008 (2001-07-01), Sanfilippo
patent: 6446061 (2002-09-01), Doerre et al.
patent: 6871174 (2005-03-01), Dolan et al.
patent: 7272597 (2007-09-01), Chowdhury et al.
patent: 7526425 (2009-04-01), Marchisio et al.
patent: 7752243 (2010-07-01), Hoeber et al.
patent: 2002/0059289 (2002-05-01), Wenegrat et al.
patent: 2003/0018626 (2003-01-01), Kay et al.
patent: 2003/0061028 (2003-03-01), Dey et al.
patent: 2003/0084066 (2003-05-01), Waterman et al.
patent: 2003/0217335 (2003-11-01), Chung et al.
patent: 2004/0054672 (2004-03-01), Tsuchitani et al.
patent: 2004/0153311 (2004-08-01), Liu et al.
patent: 2005/0165600 (2005-07-01), Kasravi et al.
patent: 2005/0198026 (2005-09-01), Dehlinger et al.
patent: 2006/0074632 (2006-04-01), Nanavati et al.
patent: 2006/0155693 (2006-07-01), Chowdhury et al.
patent: 2007/0106499 (2007-05-01), Dahlgren et al.
Mark Stevenson, “Combining Disambiguation Techniques to Enrich an Ontology,” Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing for Ontology Engineering, ECAI'02, Lyon (France), Jul. 22-23, 2002.
R.Benassi S.Bergamaschi, and M.Vincini, “TUCUXI: The InTelligent Hunter Agent for Concept Understanding and LeXical Chaining”, IEEE/WIC/ACM Web Intelligence International Conference, Beijing, China 2004, pp. 249-255.
Y. Li, Zuhair A. Bandar, D. M. 2003. An approch for measuring semantic similarity between words using multiple information sources. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15(4), 871-882.
Sundblad, H., Automatic Acquisition of Hyponyms and Meronyms from Question Corpora, Proceedings of the ECAI 2002 Workshop on Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing for Ontology Engineering (OLT'2002), Lyon, France, 2002.
Sanfilippo, A. (1994). “Word knowledge acquisition, lexicon construction and dictionary compilation.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of Computational Linguistics. COLING-94, vol. I, pp. 273-277.
M. Shamsfard and A. Barforoush, The state of the art in ontology learning: a framework for comparison, Knowledge Engineering Review 18 (4): 293-316.
Montoyo et al., “Word sense disambiguation with specification marks in unrestricted texts”, Database and Expert Systems Applications, 2000 in Proceedings 11th International Workshop on, Sep. 200, pp. 103-107.
Latifur R Khan, “Ontology-based Information Selection”, A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School University of Southern California in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy, Computer Science, Aug. 2000.
EIC—Search—report—NPL.
Buitelaar, P. and T. Declerck. Linguistic Annotation for the Semantic Web. In S. Handschuh, S. Staab, “Annotation for the Semantic Web,” IOS Press, 2003.
Vossen P., “EuroWordNet General Document”, Jul. 1, 2002.
Maedche et al., (2001), “Ontology Learning for the Semantic Web,” IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(2), 72-79.
Yoshinaga K et al: “Multi-lingual intelligent information retriever with automated ontology generator” Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information Engineering Systems, 1999. Third International Conference Adelaide, SA, Australia Aug. 31- Sep. 1999, Piscataway, N J, USA, IEEE, US, Aug. 31, 1999, pp. 62-65.
Buitelaar, P. and T. Declerck. Linguistic Annotation for the Semantic Web. In S. Handschuh, S. Staab, “Annotation for the Semantic Web,” IOS Press, 2003.
Maedche et al., (2001), “Ontology Learning for the Semantic Web,” IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(2), 72-79.
Yoshinaga K et al: “Multi-lingual intelligent information retriever with automated ontology generator” Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information Engineering Systems, 1999. Third International Conference Adelaide, SA, Australia Aug. 31- Sep. 1999, Piscataway, N J, USA, IEEE, US, Aug. 31, 1999, pp. 62-65.
Snyder, B. and M. Palmer; The English all-words task. SENSEVAL-3: 3rd Int'l Workshop on the Evaluation of Systems for the Semantic Analysis of Text; Barcelona, SP; Jul. 2004; 3pp.
Automatic Semantic Annotation using Unsupervised Information Extraction and Integration; Dingli et al.; 2000; UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; 8pp.
AeroDAML: Applying Information Extraction to Generate DAML Annotations from Web Pages; Kogut et al.; Air Force Research Laboratory; Oct. 21, 2001; 3 pp.
Automated OWL Annotation Assisted by a Large Knowledge Base; Witbrock et al.; 3rd International Semantic Web Conference; Japan; 2004; 8 pp.
Designing Adaptive Information Extraction for the Semantic Web in Amilcare; Ciravengna et al.; UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; 2003; pp. 1-16.
Linguistic Annotation for the Semantic Web; Buitelaar et al.; DFKI GmbH, Language Technology Dept.; 2003; pp. 1-19.
Machine Learning in Automated Text Categorization; F. Sebastiani; ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 34, No. 1, Mar. 2002; pp. 1-47.
Berger, A., S. Della Pietra and V. Della Pietra (1996) A Maxiumum Entrophy Approach to Natural Language Processing. Computational Linguistics, vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1-36.
Dang, H.T. et al.; The Role of Semantic Roles in Disambiguating Verb Senses. Proc of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Assoc for Computational Linguistics, Ann Arbor, MI; Jun. 2005; pp. 42-49.
Decadt, B. et al.; GAMBL, Genetic Algorithm Optimization of Memory-based WSD. SENSEVAL-3: 3rd Int'l Workshop on the Evaluation Systems for the Semantic Analysis of Text; Jul. 2004; 5 pp.
Forman, G. (2003) An Extensive Empirical Study of Feature Selection Metrics for Text Classification, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, pp. 1289-1305 & A1-A9.
Hovy, E.; Combining and Standardizing Large-Scale, Practical Ontologies for Machine Translation and Other Uses. Proc. of the Int'l Conf. on Language Resources Evaluation 1998: 8 pp.
Knight, K. and S. K. Luk. 1994. Building a Large-Scale Knowledge Base for Machine Translation. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference; 6 pp.
Kohomban, U. et al. (2005) Learning Semantic Classes for Word Sense Disambiguation; Proc of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Assoc for Computational Linguistics; Ann Arbor, MI 8 pp.
Mihalcea, R. et al.; SenseLearner: Minimally supervised word sense disambiguation for all words in open text. SENSEVAL-3: 3rd Int'l Workshop on the Evaluation of Systems for the Semantic Analysis of Text; Jul. 2004; 4 pp.
Niles, I. et al.; Linking Lexicons and Ontologies: Mapping WordNet to the Suggested Upper Merged Ontology.; 2003; pp. 1-7.
O'Hara, Tom, et al.; Inducing criteria for mass noun lexical mappings using the Cyc KB and its Extension to WordNet. In Proc of 5th Int'l Workshop on Computational Semantics; 2003; pp. 1-14.
Pedersen, T., et al.; Maximizing Semantic Relatedness to Perform Word Sense Disambiguation. Univ. of Minnesota Supercomputing Institute Research Report UMSI Mar. 25, 2005; pp. 1-34.
WordNet-Princeton University Cognitive Science Laboratory; http://cogsci.princeton.edu/; 2006; 1 p.
Resnik, P. (1995) Using Information Content to Evaluate Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy; Proc of the 14th Int'l Joint Conf on Artificer Intelligence; vol. 1; pp. 448-453.
OWL Web Ontology

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Methods of defining ontologies, word disambiguation methods,... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Methods of defining ontologies, word disambiguation methods,..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Methods of defining ontologies, word disambiguation methods,... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4254423

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.