System for ranking the relevance of information objects...

Data processing: artificial intelligence – Knowledge processing system – Knowledge representation and reasoning technique

Reissue Patent

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C706S014000, C707S999003

Reissue Patent

active

RE041899

ABSTRACT:
Information presented to a user via an information access system is ranked according to a prediction of the likely degree of relevance to the user's interests. A profile of interests is stored for each user having access to the system. Items of information to be presented to a user are ranked according to their likely degree of relevance to that user and displayed in order of ranking. The prediction of relevance is carried out by combining data pertaining to the content of each item of information with other data regarding correlations of interests between users. A value indicative of the content of a document can be added to another value which defines user correlation, to produce a ranking score for a document. Alternatively, multiple regression analysis or evolutionary programming can be carried out with respect to various factors pertaining to document content and user correlation, to generate a prediction of relevance. The user correlation data is obtained from feedback information provided by users when they retrieve items of information. Preferably, the user provides an indication of interest in each document which he or she retrieves from the system.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4775935 (1988-10-01), Yourick
patent: 5107419 (1992-04-01), MacPhail
patent: 5132900 (1992-07-01), Gilchrist et al.
patent: 5167011 (1992-11-01), Priest
patent: 5321833 (1994-06-01), Chang et al.
patent: 5333266 (1994-07-01), Boaz et al.
patent: 5377354 (1994-12-01), Scannell et al.
patent: 5410344 (1995-04-01), Graves et al.
patent: 5446891 (1995-08-01), Kaplan et al.
patent: 5446919 (1995-08-01), Wilkins
patent: 5483278 (1996-01-01), Strubbe et al.
patent: 5504896 (1996-04-01), Schell et al.
patent: 5515098 (1996-05-01), Carles
patent: 5541638 (1996-07-01), Story
patent: 5576954 (1996-11-01), Driscoll
patent: 5583763 (1996-12-01), Atcheson et al.
patent: 5616876 (1997-04-01), Cluts
patent: 5619709 (1997-04-01), Caid et al.
patent: 5704017 (1997-12-01), Heckerman et al.
patent: 5721827 (1998-02-01), Logan et al.
patent: 5724567 (1998-03-01), Rose et al.
patent: 5749081 (1998-05-01), Whiteis
patent: 5749549 (1998-05-01), Ashjaee
patent: 5759101 (1998-06-01), Von Kohorn
patent: 5790935 (1998-08-01), Payton
patent: 5835087 (1998-11-01), Herz et al.
patent: 5848396 (1998-12-01), Gerace
patent: 5931901 (1999-08-01), Wolfe et al.
patent: 5945988 (1999-08-01), Williams et al.
patent: 5963916 (1999-10-01), Kaplan
patent: 6018738 (2000-01-01), Breese et al.
patent: 6266649 (2001-07-01), Linden et al.
patent: 6453302 (2002-09-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 7117516 (2006-10-01), Khoo et al.
patent: 2304489 (1997-03-01), None
Maltz, D., “Distributing Information for Collaborative Filtering on Usenet Net News,” May 1994, M.S. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Resnick, P., et al., “GroupLens: An Open Architecture for Collaborative Filtering of Netnews,” Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 1994, p. 175-186, ACM, New York, NY.
Loeb, S., “Architecting Personalized Delivery of Multimedia Information,” Information Filtering, Communications of the ACM, Dec. 1992, pp. 39-48, vol. 35, No. 12.
Loeb, S., “Delivering Interactive Multimedia Documents Over Networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, May 1992, pp. 52-59.
Loeb, S., et al., “Lessons fromLyricTime™: A Prototype Multimedia System,” Computer Communication Review, ADM SIGCOMM, 1992, pp. 35-36.
Loeb, S., et al., “Lessons fromLyricTime™: A Prototype Multimedia System, Extended Abstract,” Bell Communicatons Research, Apr. 3, 1992, pp. 106-113.
Yan, T.W. et al., “Index Structures for Information Filtering Under the Vector Space Model,” Stanford University, Nov. 8, 1993, pp. 1-33.
Belew, Richard K., “Adaptive Information Retrieval: Using A Connectionist Representation To Retrieve And Learn About Documents,” 12thInt'l Conference on Research & Development in IR (Jun. 1989), Boston, MA.
Bookstein, Abraham, “Fuzzy Requests: An Approach To Weighted Boolean Searches,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science (Jul. 1980), vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 240-247.
Bussey, Howard E. et al., “Service Architecture, Prototype Description, And Network Implications Of A Personalized Information Grazing Service,” IEEE Infocom (1990), vol. 3, pp. 1046-1053.
Chang, Shih-Chio et al., “And-Less Retrieval Toward Perfect Ranking,” Proceedings of the 50thASIS Annual Meeting (Oct. 1987), vol. 24 pp. 30-35.
Chang, Shih-Chio et al., “Towards A Friendly Adaptable Information Retrieval System,” Proceedings of the RIAO (Mar. 1988), pp. 172-182.
Fischer, Gerhard et al., “Information Access in Complex, Poorly Structured Information Spaces,” CHI '91 Proceedings (Apr.-May 1991), pp. 63-70.
Goldberg, David et al., “Using Collaborative Filtering to Weave an Information Tapestry,” Communications of the Association for Computer Machinery (Dec. 1992), vol. 35, No. 12, pp. 61-70.
Jacobs, Paul S. et al., “Scisor: Extracting Information From On-Line News,” Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery (Nov. 1990), vol. 33, No. 11, pp. 88-97.
Jennings, Andrew et al., “A Personal News Service Based on a User Model Neural Network,” IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, (Mar. 1992), vol. E75-D, No. 2, pp. 198-209.
Jennings, Andrew et al., “Customer Adaptive Communication Services,” IEEE Region 10 International Conference, (Nov. 11-13, 1992), vol. 2, pp. 886-890.
Kantardzic, M. et al., “Graphical Knowledge Based Electronic Mail System,” IEEE Conference (May 24, 1991), pp. 1165-1168.
Karlgren, Jussi, “Using Reader Data as a Basis for Measuring Document Proximity,” An Algebra for Recommendations (date unknown), pp. 1-9.
Malone, Thomas W. et al., “The Information Lens: An Intelligent System for Information Sharing in Organizations,” CHI '86 Proceedings (Apr. 1986), pp. 1-8, Boston, MA.
Mukhopadhyay, Uttam, et al., “An Intelligent System For Document Retrieval In Distributed Office Environments,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science (May 1986), vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 123-135.
Reynolds, C.F., “On-Line Review: A New Application of the HICOM Conferencing System,” IEEE Colloquium on ‘Human Factors in Electronic Mail and Conferencing Systems’, (Feb. 3, 1989), Digest No. 20, pp. 1-4.
Rothman, Matt, “A New Music Retailing Technology says, ‘Listen Here’,” The New York Times (Sunday Jul. 4, 1993), pp. F8-9.
Salton, Gerard et al., “Extended Boolean Information Retrieval,” Communications of the ACM (Nov. 1983), vol. 26, No. 11, pp. 1022-1036.
Savoy, Jacques, “Searching Information in Hypertext Systems Using Multiple Sources of Evidence,” International Journal fo Man-Medicine Studies (Jun. 1993), vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 1017-1030.
Sheth, Beerud et al., “Evolving Agents for Personalized Information Filtering,” Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications (Mar. 5, 1993), pp. 345-352.
Spoerri, Anselm, “Visual Tools For Information Retrieval,” IEEE Conference (Aug. 27, 1993), pp. 160-168.
Stanfill, Craig, “Massively Parallel Information Retrieval for Wide Area Information Servers,” IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Oct. 13-16, 1991), vol. 1, pp. 679-682.
Terry, Douglas B., “Replication In An Information Filtering System,” IEEE Conference (Nov. 13, 1992), pp. 66-67.
Wyle, M.F. et al., “A Wide Area Network Information Filter,” IEEE Conference (Oct. 11, 1991), pp.10-15.
“Announcement of Bellcore Video Rating System,” (Nov. 1, 1993).
Scsior: Extracting information from online news by Jacobs P.S. et al. Communications of the association for computing machinery, pp. 88-97, Mar. 5, 1993.
“An

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

System for ranking the relevance of information objects... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with System for ranking the relevance of information objects..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System for ranking the relevance of information objects... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4239001

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.