Identifying the most relevant computer system state information

Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or... – Inventory management

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C705S007380, C705S022000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07840451

ABSTRACT:
Operations to manage statements relating to a computer system state include obtaining, in a computer system and from any of several sources, statements that relate to a current state of the computer system. Each statement comprises several elements. The operations comprise assigning focus values to the elements of each statement, each focus value indicating a relevance of the element to the current state of the computer system. The operations comprise identifying a subset of the statements based on the focus values. The operations comprise making a first output to a user, the first output being selected from several predefined outputs using the subset of the statements. The output may represent the current state to the user or it may present at least one of several predefined goals to the user for selection, the at least one goal being identified as being possible to accomplish based on the current state.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4736296 (1988-04-01), Katayama et al.
patent: 4914590 (1990-04-01), Loatman et al.
patent: 4930071 (1990-05-01), Tou et al.
patent: 4931935 (1990-06-01), Ohira et al.
patent: 4974191 (1990-11-01), Amirghodsi et al.
patent: 4994967 (1991-02-01), Asakawa
patent: 5167010 (1992-11-01), Elm et al.
patent: 5193143 (1993-03-01), Kaemmerer et al.
patent: 5239617 (1993-08-01), Gardner et al.
patent: 5255386 (1993-10-01), Prager
patent: 5282265 (1994-01-01), Rohra Suda et al.
patent: 5369575 (1994-11-01), Lamberti et al.
patent: 5577165 (1996-11-01), Takebayashi et al.
patent: 5615342 (1997-03-01), Johnson
patent: 5748158 (1998-05-01), Kim
patent: 5794050 (1998-08-01), Dahlgren et al.
patent: 5802504 (1998-09-01), Suda et al.
patent: 5819225 (1998-10-01), Eastwood et al.
patent: 5953526 (1999-09-01), Day et al.
patent: 6021403 (2000-02-01), Horvitz et al.
patent: 6050898 (2000-04-01), Vange et al.
patent: 6101485 (2000-08-01), Fortenberry et al.
patent: 6157310 (2000-12-01), Milne et al.
patent: 6286131 (2001-09-01), Beers et al.
patent: 6557035 (2003-04-01), McKnight
patent: 6675159 (2004-01-01), Lin et al.
patent: 6824049 (2004-11-01), Lee et al.
patent: 6950793 (2005-09-01), Ross et al.
patent: 7010588 (2006-03-01), Martin et al.
patent: 7024348 (2006-04-01), Scholz et al.
patent: 7027974 (2006-04-01), Busch et al.
patent: 7158628 (2007-01-01), McConnell et al.
patent: 7225183 (2007-05-01), Gardner
patent: 7328209 (2008-02-01), Das et al.
patent: 7475133 (2009-01-01), Nuggehalli
patent: 2004/0010711 (2004-01-01), Tang et al.
patent: 2004/0102960 (2004-05-01), Shimomura et al.
patent: 2004/0181390 (2004-09-01), Manson
patent: 2005/0054381 (2005-03-01), Lee et al.
patent: 2005/0080628 (2005-04-01), Kuperstein
patent: 2005/0097121 (2005-05-01), Sally et al.
patent: 0052757 (1992-06-01), None
patent: 0 692 765 (1996-01-01), None
patent: 2 153 560 (1985-08-01), None
Sommerville, “Chapter 4: Software processes and Chapter 6: Software requirements,”Software Engineering, Seventh Edition, Pearson Education, 2004, pp. 74-79 and 118-119.
Chadha, Vineet, “Book Review: Rob's Guide to Using VMware, by Rob Bastiaansen,”[online] [retrieved on Aug. 22, 2005] <URL: http://www.virtual-strategy.com/article/articleview/538/1/2/ >, pp. 1-3.
Kerkez et al., “Incremental Case-Based Plan Recognition Using State Indices,” [online]. [Retrieved on Aug. 22, 2005] Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.cs.wright.edu/˜mcox/Papers/kerkez-cox-iccbr01.pdf> pp. 1-15.
“A Guide to GOMS Task Analysis,” [online] David Kieras 1994. Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://www-static.cc.gatech.edu/computing/classes/cs6751—98—fall/handouts/GOMS-Kieras.html> pp. 1-47.
McCarthy, John, “Actions and Other Events in Situation Calculus,” [online]. Computer Science Department Stanford University Stanford, Feb. 8, 2002. Retrieved from the Internet URL< http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/sitcalc/sitcalc.html> pp. 1-13.
McCarthy et al., “Some Philosophical Problems From the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence,” [online] Computer Science Dept Stanford University, 1969. Retrieved from the Internet URL < http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/mcchay69/mcchay69.html>. pp. 1-51.
Newell et al., “Human Problem Solving,” Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1972, pp. 87-140.
Polya, G., “How to Solve it: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method,” Doubleday & Company, Inc., 2ndEd., 1957, pp. v-xvii.
Watson et al., Case-Based Reasoning: A Review, [online] The Knowledge Engineering Review, 1994 [retrieved on Aug. 22, 2005] <URL: http://www.ai-cbr.org/classroom/cbr-review.html >, pp. 1-33.
Amazon.com Frequently Asked Questions [online], SourceForge.net, 2005 [retrieved on Aug. 18, 2005]. <URL: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/browse/-/13316081/ref=pd—ys—help—iyr/103-5110429-2895835>, pp. 1-6.
Kubrick and Clarke, screenplay of 2001:A Space Odyssey.Knowledge In Speech and Language Processing, [online] Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.cs.colorado.edu/˜martin/SLP/slp-chl.pdf> pp. 1-18.
Fuchs et al.,Controlled Natural Language Can Replace First-Order Logic[online] Retrieved on Jul. 20, 2005. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.ifi.unizh.ch/groups/req/ftp/papers/ASE99.pdf>.
Sowa, John F. “Controlled English” [online]. John F. Sowa 1999, 2004, [retrieved on Jul. 20, 2005]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.jfsowa.com/logic/ace.htm>.
Schwitter and Fuchs,Attempto From Specifications in Controlled Natural Language Towards Executable Specifications. Presented at EMISA Workshop “Natürlichsprachlicher Entwurf von Informationssystemen—Grundlagen, Methoden, Werkzeuge, Anwendungen” May 28-30, 1996. Ev. Akademie Tutzing (pp. 1-15).
“Know the Rules!” [online]. European Business Rules Conference 2005, [retrieved on Jul. 20, 2005]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.eurobizrules.org/speakers/hoppen.htm>.
Commissioner European Patent Office, International Search Report in 06024314.4 mailed Apr. 12, 2007.
Commissioner European Patent Office, International Search Report in 06021908.6 mailed Feb. 20, 2007.
Jurafsky, et al. “Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition”, Prentice Hall 2000. Chapter 1, pp. 1-18.
USPTO Final office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/269,784, mailed Apr. 23, 2009.
USPTO Non Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/269,784, mailed Oct. 29, 2008.
USPTO Non Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/269,784, mailed May 22, 2008.
USPTO Non Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/294,992, mailed Sept. 15, 2008.
USPTO Non Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/294,992, mailed Dec. 31, 2007.
USPTO Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/294,992, mailed Jun. 23, 2008.
Prager et al, “Reason: An Intelligent User Assistant for Interactive Environments,” IBM Systems Journal, IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, Jan. 29, 1990(1): 141-164.
Smith et al, “Intelligent Help—The Results of the EUROHELP Project,” ICL Technical Journal, Oxford, GB, 7(2): 328-361 Nov. 1990.
Silberschatz et al., “Operating System Concepts, Passage,” Operating System Concepts, 1994, pp. 97-148.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Identifying the most relevant computer system state information does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Identifying the most relevant computer system state information, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Identifying the most relevant computer system state information will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4219502

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.