Chemistry: electrical and wave energy – Processes and products – Electrophoresis or electro-osmosis processes and electrolyte...
Reexamination Certificate
2003-02-21
2008-11-18
Noguerola, Alex (Department: 1795)
Chemistry: electrical and wave energy
Processes and products
Electrophoresis or electro-osmosis processes and electrolyte...
C204S616000
Reexamination Certificate
active
07452453
ABSTRACT:
A gel and buffer system for gel electrophoresis wherein separation occurs at neutral pH.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3870812 (1975-03-01), Hayes, Jr. et al.
patent: 3948743 (1976-04-01), Monthony et al.
patent: 4139440 (1979-02-01), Chrambach et al.
patent: 4209373 (1980-06-01), Bluestein et al.
patent: 4481094 (1984-11-01), de Castro et al.
patent: 4504641 (1985-03-01), Nochumson
patent: 4542200 (1985-09-01), Nochumson
patent: 4699705 (1987-10-01), Ogawa et al.
patent: 4790919 (1988-12-01), Baylor, Jr.
patent: 4950708 (1990-08-01), Hochstrasser
patent: 4954236 (1990-09-01), Kusher et al.
patent: 5085758 (1992-02-01), Guadagno et al.
patent: 5110434 (1992-05-01), Zhu et al.
patent: 5120413 (1992-06-01), Chen et al.
patent: 5167784 (1992-12-01), Noolandi
patent: 5171410 (1992-12-01), Guadagno et al.
patent: 5246558 (1993-09-01), Chevigne et al.
patent: 5275708 (1994-01-01), Atkins et al.
patent: 5304292 (1994-04-01), Jacobs et al.
patent: 5334708 (1994-08-01), Chang et al.
patent: 5370777 (1994-12-01), Guttman et al.
patent: 5436129 (1995-07-01), Stapleton
patent: 5464516 (1995-11-01), Takeda et al.
patent: 5512146 (1996-04-01), Brunk et al.
patent: 5578180 (1996-11-01), Engelhorn et al.
patent: 5837288 (1998-11-01), Sylvester et al.
patent: 5922185 (1999-07-01), Updyke et al.
patent: 6059948 (2000-05-01), Updyke et al.
patent: 6096182 (2000-08-01), Updyke et al.
patent: 6143154 (2000-11-01), Updyke et al.
patent: 6162338 (2000-12-01), Updyke et al.
patent: 6632340 (2003-10-01), Dale et al.
patent: 6743344 (2004-06-01), Panattoni et al.
patent: 6783651 (2004-08-01), Updyke et al.
patent: 698145 (1998-10-01), None
patent: B-21926/95 (1998-10-01), None
patent: 2186120 (1995-10-01), None
patent: 69511389 (1999-09-01), None
patent: 0 087 995 (1983-02-01), None
patent: 0 087 995 (1983-02-01), None
patent: 0 518 475 (1992-12-01), None
patent: 0 566 784 (1993-10-01), None
patent: 0 518 475 (1997-04-01), None
patent: 0 753 142 (1999-08-01), None
patent: 0753142 (1999-08-01), None
patent: 4-184163 (1992-07-01), None
patent: 5-203621 (1993-08-01), None
patent: 5-505877 (1993-08-01), None
patent: 5-322846 (1993-12-01), None
patent: 9-512907 (1997-12-01), None
patent: 2004-163442 (2004-06-01), None
patent: 0368 955 (2003-01-01), None
patent: WO92/04625 (1992-03-01), None
patent: WO 95/27197 (1995-10-01), None
Appendix—Buffer and Gels for Electrophoresis: III. Buffers and Gels for Electrophoresis (adapted from Bown, 1991) downloaded from www.roche-applied-scince.com on Jul. 20, 2006.
Xiao et al. (“Purification and characterization of cephalosporin 7α-hydroxylase fromStreptomyces clavuligerus,” Biochem. J. (1991) 280, 471-474).
CAPLUS abstract of Rodbard et al. (“Optimization of resolution in analytical and preparative polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis,” Electrophor. Isoelectric Focusing Polyacrylamide Gel, [Proc. Small Conf.] (1974), Meeting Date 1972, 62-113. Editor(s): Allen et al. Publisher: de Gruyter, Berlin, Ger.).
Chrambach et al. (Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis, Science, vol. 172, pp. 440-451) Apr. 30, 1971.
Jovin et al.,Multiphasic Buffer System Catalogue, Government Accession No. PB 196090, Aug. 26, 1970.
Computer System No. 2035, Aug. 26, 1970 [Best Available Copy].
Chambach et al., “Analytical Preparative Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis,”Methods of Protein Separation, vol. 2, 27-144, (1976).
Chambach, “Unified View of Moving Boundary Electrophoresis: Practical Implications (Plenary Lecture),”J. of Chromotography, 320, p. 1-14, (1985).
Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of the Motion of Invitrogen Corporation for Preliminary Injunction, filed Aug. 4, 2005, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California (San Diego), Case # 05-CV-720,Invitrogen Corp.v.Bio Rad Laboratories.
Declaration of Tanya D. Dement in Support of Invitrogen Corporation for Preliminary Injunction, filed Aug. 4, 2005, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California (San Diego), Case # 05-CV-720,Invitrogen Corp.v.Bio Rad Laboratories.
Declaration of Christopher A. Martinez in Support of the Motion of Plaintiff Invitrogen Corporation for Preliminary Injunction, filed Aug. 4, 2005, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California (San Diego), Case # 05-CV-720,Invitrogen Corp.v.Bio Rad Laboratories.
Declaration of Sheldon Engelhorn in Support of the Motion of Invitrogen Corporation for Preliminary Injunction, filed Aug. 4, 2005, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California (San Diego), Case # 05-CV-720,Invitrogen Corp.v.Bio Rad Laboratories.
Declaration of Amy Butler in Support of the Motion of Plaintiff Invitrogen Corporation for Preliminary Injunction, filed Aug. 4, 2005, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California (San Diego), Case # 05-CV-720,invitrogen Corp.v.Bio Rad Laboratories.
Answer of Invitrogen Corporation to First Amended Counterclaims of Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., filed Aug. 8, 2005, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California (San Diego), Case # 05-CV-720,Invitrogen Corp.v.Bio Rad Laboratories.
Reply in Support of Invitrogen Corporation's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, filed Aug. 30, 2005, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California (San Diego), Case # 05-CV-720,Invitrogen Corp.v.Bio Rad Laboratories.
Declaration of Tanya D. Dement in Support of Reply to Invitrogen Corporation's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, filed Aug. 30, 2005, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California (San Diego), Case # 05-CV-720,Invitrogen Corp.v.Bio Rad Laboratories.
Declaration of Timothy Updyke in Support of Invitrogen's Reply in Support of the Motion for Preliminary Injunction and in Support of the Opposition to Bio-Rad's Motion for SummaryJudgment, filed Aug. 30, 2005, U.S. District Court Southern District of California (San Diego), Case #05-CV-720,Invitrogen Corp.v.Bio Rad Laboratories.
Declaration of Michael D. Morris in Support of Invitrogen's Reply in Support of the Motion for Preliminary Injunction and in Support of the Opposition to Bio-Rad's Motion for Summary Judgement, filed Aug. 30, 2005, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California (San Diego), Case #05-CV-720,Invitrogen Corp.v.Bio Rad Laboratories.
Defendant Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.'s, Corrected Opposition to Plaintiff Invitrogen's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Cross Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity, filed Sep. 2, 2005, U.S. District Southern District of California (San Diego), Case # 05-CV-720,Invitrogen Corp.v.Bio Rad Laboratories. Unredacted portions included.
Declaration of Dr. Harvey Blanch in Support of Defendant Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Opposition to Plaintiff Invitrogen's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Cross Motion for Summary Judgement of Patent Invalidity, filed Sep. 2, 2005, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California (San Diego), Case # 05-CV-720,Invitrogen Corp.v.Bio Rad Laboratories.
Declaration of Kfir B. Levy in Support of Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiff Invitrogen's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Cross Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity, file Sep. 2, 2005, with Exhibits 5-7, 11-24, Exhibits 2, 3, 4 and 8-10 are already of record. Exhibits 1, 1A-1C are submitted separately herein. U.S. District Court, Southern District of California (San Diego), Case # 05-CV-720,Invitrogen Corp.v.Bio Rad Laboratories.
Palintiff Invitrogen's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff Invitrogen's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment of Validity, filed Sep. 8, 2005, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California (San Diego), Case # 05-CV-720,Invitrogen Corp.v.Bio Rad Laboratories.
Declaration of Tracey Davies in Support of Plaintiff Invitrogen's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff Invitrogen's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment of Validity, filed Sep. 8, 2005, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California (San Diego), Case # 05-CV-720,Invitrogen Corp.v.Bio Rad Laboratories.
Declaration of Amy Butler in Support of Invitrogen's Opposition to Defendant's Motion f
Engelhorn Sheldon C
Updyke Timothy V
Invitrogen Corporation
Noguerola Alex
LandOfFree
System for pH-neutral stable electrophoresis gel does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with System for pH-neutral stable electrophoresis gel, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System for pH-neutral stable electrophoresis gel will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4044303