Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput – Computer conferencing – Demand based messaging
Reexamination Certificate
2003-10-14
2008-11-11
Vu, Viet (Department: 2154)
Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput
Computer conferencing
Demand based messaging
C709S219000, C709S225000, C719S329000
Reexamination Certificate
active
07451184
ABSTRACT:
Embodiments, among others, of the present disclosure provide systems and methods for providing child protection in communication services. Briefly described, in architecture, some embodiments of the system, among others, can be implemented as follows. A user interface for a communications service is configured to provide an operation that is restricted from being performed by a user of a communication suite or persona of a child type. The communication suite has at least one communications account of the user for the communications service. Accordingly, logic is provided that determines if the user of a communication suite of the child type is attempting to perform the operation. Other systems and methods are provided.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5944787 (1999-08-01), Zoken
patent: 5999932 (1999-12-01), Paul
patent: 6023723 (2000-02-01), McCormick
patent: 6052709 (2000-04-01), Paul
patent: 6161130 (2000-12-01), Horvitz et al.
patent: 6192360 (2001-02-01), Dumais et al.
patent: 6249805 (2001-06-01), Fleming, III
patent: 6266692 (2001-07-01), Greenstein
patent: 6321267 (2001-11-01), Donaldson
patent: 6442588 (2002-08-01), Clark et al.
patent: 6480885 (2002-11-01), Olivier
patent: 6654787 (2003-11-01), Aronson et al.
patent: 6654800 (2003-11-01), Rieger, III
patent: 6708205 (2004-03-01), Sheldon et al.
patent: 6732157 (2004-05-01), Gordon et al.
patent: 6748403 (2004-06-01), Lemke
patent: 6757740 (2004-06-01), Parekh et al.
patent: 6769016 (2004-07-01), Rothwell
patent: 6779021 (2004-08-01), Bates
patent: 6782510 (2004-08-01), Gross et al.
patent: 6842773 (2005-01-01), Raiston et al.
patent: 6854014 (2005-02-01), Amin et al.
patent: 6941466 (2005-09-01), Mastrianni
patent: 6968571 (2005-11-01), Devine et al.
patent: 7051077 (2006-05-01), Lin
patent: 7155484 (2006-12-01), Malik
patent: 7155608 (2006-12-01), Malik
patent: 2001/0054101 (2001-12-01), Wilson
patent: 2002/0013692 (2002-01-01), Chandhok et al.
patent: 2002/0049806 (2002-04-01), Gatz et al.
patent: 2002/0059454 (2002-05-01), Barrett et al.
patent: 2002/0065828 (2002-05-01), Goodspeed
patent: 2002/0073233 (2002-06-01), Gross et al.
patent: 2002/0107712 (2002-08-01), Lam et al.
patent: 2002/0116641 (2002-08-01), Mastrianni
patent: 2002/0199095 (2002-12-01), Bandini et al.
patent: 2003/0144842 (2003-07-01), Addison et al.
patent: 2003/0172020 (2003-09-01), Davies et al.
patent: 2003/0172196 (2003-09-01), Hejlsberg et al.
patent: 2003/0233418 (2003-12-01), Goldman
patent: 2004/0015554 (2004-01-01), Wilson
patent: 2004/0039786 (2004-02-01), Horvitz et al.
patent: 2004/0054733 (2004-03-01), Weeks
patent: 2004/0054741 (2004-03-01), Weatherby et al.
patent: 2004/0064537 (2004-04-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 2004/0073617 (2004-04-01), Milliken et al.
patent: 2004/0088359 (2004-05-01), Simpson
patent: 2004/0093384 (2004-05-01), Shipp
patent: 2004/0117451 (2004-06-01), Chung
patent: 2004/0167964 (2004-08-01), Rounthwaite et al.
patent: 2004/0181581 (2004-09-01), Kosco
patent: 2005/0022008 (2005-01-01), Goodman et al.
patent: 2005/0050150 (2005-03-01), Dinkin
Malik; Final Rejection mailed Nov. 15, 2005; U.S. Appl. No. 10/005,641, filed Dec. 5, 2001.
Malik; Non-Final Rejection mailed May 5, 2006; U.S. Appl. No. 10/005,641, filed Dec. 5, 2001.
Malik; Notice of Allowance and Fees Due mailed Oct. 17, 2005; U.S. Appl. No. 10/005,641, filed Dec. 5, 2001.
“What is Spam?”, Promote Responsible Net Commerce, Help Stamp out Spam, 1 page.
“Why is spam bad?”, Promote Responsible Net Commerce, Stamp out spam, 2 pages.
“Spammers do more than spam”, Promote Responsible Net Commerce: Help Stamp out spam, 2 pages.
“How does eMail Server Work?”, Oracle eMail Server Understanding and Planning Guide, Release 5.1, 13 pages.
“Understanding E-mail Client”, How E-mail Works, Marshall Brian's How Stuff Works, 2 pages.
“Understanding a Simple E-mail Server?”, How E-mail works, Marshall Brian's How Stuff Works, 2 pages.
“Understanding SMTP”, How E-Mail Works, Marshall Brian's How Stuff Works, 1 page.
“Understanding the POP3 Server?”, How E-mail Works, Marshall Brian's How Stuff Works, 2 pages.
“Understanding the Real E-Mail System”, How E-Mail Works, Marshall Brian's How Stuff Works, 3 pages.
“Understanding Attachments”, How E-Mail Works, Marshall Brian's How Stuff Works, 2 pages.
“The Simplicity of E-mail”, How E-mail Works, Marshall Brian's How Stuff Works, 1 page.
“E-mail Glossary”, Everything E-mail, Internet Mail Services Network, Inc., Ipswich, MA, 3 pages.
“How Does Email Work?”, Yale University Library Workstation Support Group, 4 pages.
“How Does Email Work?”, IATS Computing Knowledge Base, University of Missouri, Columbia, 4 pages.
“What is an E-mail message”, How E-mail works, Marshall Brian's How Stuff Works, 2 pages.
Graham: “A Plan for Spam”, www.paulgrahm.com/spam.html; printed Jun. 23, 2003, pp. 1-13.
Graham; “Better Bayesian Filtering”, www.paulgrahm.com/better.html, printed Jun. 26, 2003, pp. 1-11.
Shami; “A Bayesian Approach to Filtering Junk E-mail”, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, pp. 1-8.
River; The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm, Internet RFC 1321, Apr. 1992, pp. 1-21.
Malik; U.S. Appl. No. 11/466,948, filed Aug. 24, 2006.
Daniell; U.S. Appl. No. 11/685,656, filed Oct. 14, 2003.
Malik; U.S. Appl. No. 10/610,736, filed Jun. 30, 2003.
Daniell; U.S. Appl. No. 10/685,558, filed Oct. 14, 2003.
Malik; U.S. Appl. No. 10/609,164, filed Dec. 11, 2006.
Sheppard; U.S. Appl. No. 11/245,888, filed Oct. 7, 2005.
Daniell; U.S. Appl. No. 10/686,293, filed Oct. 14, 2003.
Daniell; U.S. Appl. No. 10/686,346, filed Oct. 14, 2003.
Malik; U.S. Appl. No. 10/005,641, filed Dec. 5, 2001.
Malik; Non- Final Rejection mailed Mar. 9, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 11/466,948, filed Aug. 24, 2006.
Malik; Final Rejection mailed Sep. 26, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 11/466,948, filed Aug. 24, 2006.
Daniell; Non- Final Rejection mailed Oct. 30, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 10/685,656, filed Oct. 14, 2003.
Malik; Examiner Interview Summary Record mailed Dec. 21, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 10/685,656, filed Oct. 14, 2003.
Malik; Non- Final Rejection mailed Nov. 12, 2004; U.S. Appl. No. 10/610,736, filed Jun. 30, 2003.
Malik;Examiner Interview Summary Record mailed Dec. 21, 2004; U.S. Appl. No. 10/610,736, filed Jun. 30, 2003.
Malik; Final Rejection mailed May 25, 2005; U.S. Appl. No. 10/610,736, filed Jun. 30, 2003.
Malik; Non- Final Rejection mailed Dec. 25, 2005; U.S. Appl. No. 10/610,736, filed Jun. 30, 2003.
Malik; Non- Final Rejection mailed Nov. 30, 2005; U.S. Appl. No. 10/610,736, filed Jun. 30, 2003.
Malik; Final Rejection mailed Apr. 11, 2006; U.S. Appl. No. 10/610,736, filed Jun. 30, 2003.
Malik; Examiner Interview Summary Record mailed Jun. 1, 2006; U.S. Appl. No. 10/610,736, filed Jun. 30, 2003.
Malik; Examiner Interview Summary Record mailed Jul. 6, 2006; U.S. Appl. No. 10/610,736, filed Jun. 30, 2003.
Malik; Notice of Allowance and Fees Due mailed Jul. 6, 2006; U.S. Appl. No. 10/610,736, filed Jun. 30, 2003.
Daniell; Non- Final Rejection mailed Jan. 2, 2008; U.S. Appl. No. 10/685,558, filed Oct. 14, 2003.
Daniell; Non- Final Rejection mailed Feb. 5, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 10/686,283, filed Oct. 14, 2003.
Daniell; Examiner Interview Summary Record mailed Mar. 30, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 10/686,293, filed Oct. 14, 2003.
Daniell; Final Rejection mailed Jul. 23, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 10/686,293, filed Oct. 14, 2003.
Daniell; Non- Final Rejection mailed Dec. 5, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 10/686,293, filed Oct. 14, 2003.
Daniell; Non- Final Rejection mailed Jan. 25, 2008; U.S. Appl. No. 10/686,293, filed Oct. 14, 2003.
Daniell; Non- Final Rejection mailed Mar. 22, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 10/686,346, filed Oct. 14, 2003.
Daniell; Final Rejection mailed Dec. 12, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 10/686,346, filed Oct. 14, 2003.
Malik; Non- Final Rejection mailed May 16, 2005; U.S. Appl. No. 10/005,641, filed Dec. 5, 2001.
UUencode and MIME FAQ; http://web.archive.org/web/200212170520
Daniell W. Todd
Malik Dale W.
AT&T Intellectual Property I L.P.
Thomas Kayden Horstemeyer & Risley LLP
Vu Viet
LandOfFree
Child protection from harmful email does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Child protection from harmful email, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Child protection from harmful email will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4041646