Systems and methods for providing security in a voting machine

Registers – Systems controlled by data bearing records – Voting machine

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C705S012000, C400S075000, C400S185000, C358S001140, C358S001160

Reexamination Certificate

active

07422151

ABSTRACT:
The invention provides systems and methods for ensuring security for a voting machine. The voting machine can include a display screen upon which numerous election choices are displayed for selection by a voter. A detachable printer can also be provided that is adapted to be securely attached to the voting machine and that prints the choices selected among the election choices to a print medium to generate a printed audit trail. A summary of the election choices visible on the display screen can be simultaneously compared with the printed audit trail by the voter poised in a voting position.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4641240 (1987-02-01), Boram
patent: 4649264 (1987-03-01), Carson
patent: 5585612 (1996-12-01), Harp, Jr.
patent: 5788383 (1998-08-01), Harada et al.
patent: 5871615 (1999-02-01), Harris
patent: 5977966 (1999-11-01), Bogdan
patent: 6081793 (2000-06-01), Challener et al.
patent: 6133899 (2000-10-01), Tsukamoto
patent: 6250548 (2001-06-01), McClure et al.
patent: 6388760 (2002-05-01), Kadota et al.
patent: 6529590 (2003-03-01), Centers
patent: 6581824 (2003-06-01), McClure et al.
patent: 6612759 (2003-09-01), Fukano et al.
patent: 6641033 (2003-11-01), McClure et al.
patent: 6769613 (2004-08-01), McDermott et al.
patent: 7048186 (2006-05-01), Chandler et al.
patent: 7075674 (2006-07-01), Nagumo et al.
patent: 2002/0066780 (2002-06-01), Balolia
patent: 2002/0072961 (2002-06-01), McDermott et al.
patent: 2002/0077886 (2002-06-01), Chung
patent: 2002/0084325 (2002-07-01), Reardon
patent: 2002/0191063 (2002-12-01), Gelbart et al.
patent: 2003/0006282 (2003-01-01), Vadura et al.
patent: 2003/0062411 (2003-04-01), Chung et al.
patent: 2003/0195798 (2003-10-01), Goci
patent: 2004/0060983 (2004-04-01), Davis et al.
patent: 2005/0092835 (2005-05-01), Chung et al.
patent: 2006/0164667 (2006-07-01), Ahne et al.
patent: 2007/0008399 (2007-01-01), Botten et al.
O'Connell, Ann, State of Nevada Senate, Letter to Ms. Kathryn Ferguson at Clark County Board of Country Commissioners, Jun. 6, 1995.
Mercuri, Rebecca, “Electronic Vote Tabulation Checks & Balances,” Ph.D. Dissertation Defense, Thesis Abstract, University of Pennsylvania School of Engineering and Applied Science, Department of Computer and Information Systems, Friday, Oct. 27, 2000, 2:30 pm http://www.notablesoftware.com/Papers/thesdefabs.html.
Mercuri, Rebecca, “Electronic Vote Tabulation Checks & Balances,” A Dissertation in Computer and Information Science, Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, 2001.
Dugger, Ronnie, “Annals of Democracy Counting Votes,” The New Yorker, Nov. 7, 1988 http://www.csl.sri.com/users/Neumann/dugger.html.
Saltman, Roy G., “Accuracy, Integrity, and Security in Computerized Vote-Tallying,” Computer Science and Technology, NBS Special Publication 500-158, Institute for Computer Sciences and Technology, National Bureau of Standards, Aug. 1988 http://www.itl.nist.gov/lab/specpubs/500-158.html.
Mercuri, Rebecca, “Voting-Machine Risks,” Inside Risks 29, CACM 35, Nov. 11, 1992 http:/
otablesoftware.com/Papers/vmrisks.html.
Shamos Ph.D., J.D., Michael Ian, “CFP'93—Electronic Voting—Evaluating the Threat,” CPSR, 1993 http://www.cpsr.org/conferences/cfp93/shamos.html.
Neumann, Peter G., “Security Criteria for Electronic Voting,” Computer Science Laboratory, SRI International, Presented at the 16thNational Computer Security Conference, Sep. 20-23, 1993 http://www.csl.sri.com/users/Neumann
cs93.html.
Mercuri, Rebecca, “Corrupted Polling,” Inside Risks 93 CACM 36, Nov. 11, 1993, p. 122 http://www.notablesoftware.com/Papers/corrpoll.html.
Saltman, Roy G., “CFP'93—Assuring Accuracy, Integrity and Security in National Elections: The Role of the U.S. Congress,” CPSR, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Feb. 12, 1993 http://www.cpsr.org/conferences/cpf93/saltman.html.
Mercuri, Rebecca, “The FEC Proposed Voting Systems Standard Update [A Detailed Comment],” Submitted to the Federal Election Commission on Sep. 10, 2001 in accordance with Federal Register FEC Notice Sep. 2001, vol. 66, No. 132 http://www.notablesoftware.com/Papers/FECRM.html.
Mercuri, Rebecca T., “Physical Verifiability of Computer Systems,” Notable Software, 1997.
“Voters Prefer To See Their Votes Recorded On Paper According to Surveys Reported by AccuPoll,” Businesswire, Feb. 3, 2003.
Mercuri, Rebecca, “A Better Ballot Box?,” IEEE Spectrum, Oct. 2002, pp. 46-50.
“Resolution on electronic voting” Last modified Jan. 20, 2000 http://verify.Stanford.edu/dill/EVOTE/statement.html.
Dugger, Ronnie, “Annals of Democracy Counting Votes,” The New Yorker, Nov. 7, 1988 http://www.newsgarden.org/columns/dugger.shtml.
“Voting—What Is, What Could Be,” Caltech MIT, Voting Technology Project, Jul. 2001.
Newspaper Articles—Las Vegas Review Journal—Jul. 1994.
Rebecca Mercuri—Explanation of Voter-Verified Ballot Systems—Jul. 2002.
May 1995 Minutes of Senate Committee.
May 1995—Minutes of Assembly Committee on Elections and Proc.
Feb. 1995—Minutes of Senate Committee on Govt. Affairs.
'86—Hyde—Progress Report on Computerized Voting.
'86—Benson—Computerized Voting.
“Forum on Risks to the Public in Computers and Related Systems”,The Risks Digest, vol. 2:22, Wednesday, Mar. 5, 1986.
Dechert, Alan, “The Voter Certified Ballot—A Proposal for Ballot Reform”, Feb. 13, 2001.
Federal Election Commission, “Performance and Test Standards for Punchcard, Marksense, and Direct Recording Electronic Voting Systems”, Jan. 1990.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Systems and methods for providing security in a voting machine does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Systems and methods for providing security in a voting machine, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Systems and methods for providing security in a voting machine will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3992789

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.