Display and analysis of medical images using calibrated...

Image analysis – Applications – Biomedical applications

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C250S252100, C378S207000, C600S331000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07424142

ABSTRACT:
Methods to calibrate and display medical images with pixel values with known properties of one or more reference materials provide images which allow more accurate quantification of certain tissue properties. The images provide advantages in medical diagnosis by being standardized and independent of imaging devices or imaging techniques. The images are automatically displayed and/or filmed in optimum windows and levels. The images are calibrated with a variety of reference materials and displayed in a variety of measurement units. For example, CT images are displayed with pixel values in units of grams per cubic centimeter calibrated to a known reference which relate to but are quantitatively different from the customary Hounsfield scale based on water as the reference material. A novel more quantitative CT image display scale provides advantages in diagnosis, image recording and standardization. References with known magnetic properties imaged with MRI provide calibration and display standardization.

REFERENCES:
patent: 2399650 (1946-05-01), Moyer
patent: 2426884 (1947-09-01), Kieffer
patent: 3705383 (1972-12-01), Frayer
patent: 3944830 (1976-03-01), Dissing
patent: 4115691 (1978-09-01), Oldendorf
patent: 4115762 (1978-09-01), Akiyama et al.
patent: 4124799 (1978-11-01), Schittenhelm
patent: 4233507 (1980-11-01), Volz
patent: 4400827 (1983-08-01), Spears
patent: 4475122 (1984-10-01), Green
patent: 4593400 (1986-06-01), Mouyen
patent: 4593406 (1986-06-01), Stone
patent: 4649561 (1987-03-01), Arnold
patent: 4651335 (1987-03-01), Kalender et al.
patent: 4663772 (1987-05-01), Mattson et al.
patent: 4721112 (1988-01-01), Hirano et al.
patent: 4724110 (1988-02-01), Arnold
patent: 4779621 (1988-10-01), Mattson
patent: 4811373 (1989-03-01), Stein
patent: 4829549 (1989-05-01), Vogel et al.
patent: 4852137 (1989-07-01), Mackay
patent: 4922915 (1990-05-01), Arnold et al.
patent: 4941164 (1990-07-01), Schuller et al.
patent: 4947414 (1990-08-01), Stein
patent: 4985906 (1991-01-01), Arnold
patent: 5005196 (1991-04-01), Lanza et al.
patent: 5034969 (1991-07-01), Ozaki
patent: 5040199 (1991-08-01), Stein
patent: 5049746 (1991-09-01), Ito
patent: 5056130 (1991-10-01), Engel
patent: 5068788 (1991-11-01), Goodenough et al.
patent: 5122664 (1992-06-01), Ito et al.
patent: 5123037 (1992-06-01), Picard et al.
patent: 5132995 (1992-07-01), Stein
patent: 5138553 (1992-08-01), Lanza et al.
patent: 5148455 (1992-09-01), Stein
patent: 5150394 (1992-09-01), Karellas
patent: 5187731 (1993-02-01), Shimura
patent: 5222021 (1993-06-01), Feldman et al.
patent: 5247559 (1993-09-01), Ohtsuchi et al.
patent: 5335260 (1994-08-01), Arnold
patent: 5365564 (1994-11-01), Yashida et al.
patent: 5402785 (1995-04-01), Leigh et al.
patent: 5415176 (1995-05-01), Sato et al.
patent: 5465284 (1995-11-01), Karellas
patent: 5521955 (1996-05-01), Gohno et al.
patent: 5528644 (1996-06-01), Ogawa et al.
patent: 5568811 (1996-10-01), Olstad
patent: 5577089 (1996-11-01), Mazess
patent: 5594775 (1997-01-01), Hangartner
patent: 5696805 (1997-12-01), Gaborski et al.
patent: 5712892 (1998-01-01), Weil et al.
patent: 5757877 (1998-05-01), Wilting
patent: 5774519 (1998-06-01), Lindstrom et al.
patent: 5852647 (1998-12-01), Schick et al.
patent: 5870697 (1999-02-01), Chandler et al.
patent: 5891030 (1999-04-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 5949842 (1999-09-01), Schafer et al.
patent: 5953444 (1999-09-01), Joseph et al.
patent: 6026142 (2000-02-01), Gueziec et al.
patent: 6052477 (2000-04-01), Wang et al.
patent: 6127669 (2000-10-01), Sidiropoulos et al.
patent: 6226350 (2001-05-01), Hsieh
patent: 6233304 (2001-05-01), Hu et al.
patent: 6243437 (2001-06-01), Hu et al.
patent: 6246784 (2001-06-01), Summers et al.
patent: 6249692 (2001-06-01), Cowin
patent: 6278761 (2001-08-01), Kim et al.
patent: 6301495 (2001-10-01), Gueziec et al.
patent: 6320931 (2001-11-01), Arnold
patent: 6372264 (2002-04-01), Dixon
patent: 6421552 (2002-07-01), Hsieh
patent: 6490476 (2002-12-01), Townsend et al.
patent: 6605274 (2003-08-01), Dillmann et al.
patent: 6639965 (2003-10-01), Hsieh et al.
patent: 6674834 (2004-01-01), Acharya et al.
patent: 6687333 (2004-02-01), Carroll et al.
patent: 6697451 (2004-02-01), Acharya et al.
patent: 6792074 (2004-09-01), Erbel et al.
patent: 2003/0176780 (2003-09-01), Arnold et al.
patent: 0253742 (1998-01-01), None
patent: 1092392 (2000-10-01), None
Agatston, Arthur S. et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography, American College of Cardiology, 1990; 15: pp. 827-832.
Baldy, R.E. et al., A Fully-Automated Computer Assisted Method of CT Brain Scan Analysis for the Measurement of Cerbrospinal Fluid Spaces and Brain Absorption Density, Neuroradiology, vol. 28, 1986, pp. 109-117.
Bhattacharya, P. et al., A new edge detector for gray volumetric data, Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 26, No. 4, Jul. 1996, pp. 315-328. (one-page abstract).
Borkan, Gary A. et al., Assessment of abdominal fat content by computed tomography, Am J Clin Nutr., Jul. 1982, pp. 172-177.
Brown, Matthew S. et al., Knowledge-based segmentation of thoracic computed tomography images for assessment of split lung function, Medical Physics, vol. 27, No. 3, Mar. 2000, pp. 592-598.
Cann, Christopher E. et al., Precise Measurement of Vertebral Mineral Content Using Computed Tomography, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 4, No. 4, Aug. 1980, pp. 493-500.
Cann, Christopher E. et al., Spinal Mineral Loss in Oophorectomized Women, Journal of the Americal Medical Association, vol. 244, No. 18, Nov. 7, 1980, pp. 2056-2059.
Cann, Christopher E., Low Dose CT Scanning for Quantitative Spinal Mineral Analysis, Radiology, vol. 140, No. 3, Sep. 1981, pp. 813-815.
Chuang, K.S. et al., Evaluation of inherent gray-level dynamic range in a digital image using the runs test and join-count statistics, Medical Physics, vol. 20, No. 5, Jan.-Feb. 1993, pp. 39-45. (one-page abstract).
Cosman, F. et al., Radiographic Absorptiometry; A Simple Method for Determination of Bone Mass, Osteoporosis International, 1991, pp. 34-38.
Detrano, Robert et al., Accurate coronary calcium phosphate mass measurements from electron beam computed tomograms, American Journal of Cardiac Imaging, vol. 9, No. 3, Jul. 1995, pp. 167-173.
Di Giandomenico, E. et al., Quantitative evaluation of blood in vivo with computed tomography, Radiol. Med. (Torino), (Article in Italian), vol. 85, No. 4, Apr. 1993, pp. 416-420 (one-page abstract).
Dougherty, Geoffrey et al., Measurement of thickness and density of thin structures by computed tomography: A simulation study, Medical Physics, vol. 26, No. 7, Jul. 1999, pp. 1341-1348.
Grashuis, J.L. et al., Semi-Automatic Contour Detection in CT-Scans of the Lumbar Spine, Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Bone and Soft Tissue Densitometry, Buxton, England, Sep. 22-25, 1987, p. 33.
Grauer, Walter O. et al., Quantification of body fat distribution in the abdomen using computed tomography, Am J. Clin Nutr, 1984; 39: pp. 631-637.
Greaser, L.E. 3rd et al., Electron-beam CT: the effect of using a correction function on coronary artery calcium quantitation, Acad. Radiol., vol. 6, No. 1, Jan. 1999, pp. 40-48 (one page abstract).
Hawkes, D.J. et al., Development of a Digital Radiographic Technique to Measure Bone Mineral in Neonates, Transactions of the Fifth International Workshop on Bone and Soft Tissue Densitometry Using Computed Tomography, The University of Pennsylvania, Oct. 14-18, 1985, p. 76.
Hayashi, Y., Diagnosis of Osteoporosis and Assessment of Bone Mass By Radiography: The Most Convenient Procedure to Reduce the Risk of Fracture, Osteoporosis International, Suppl. 1, 1993, pp. 78-80.
Heil, Robert H., Jr., et al., Quantitative Materials Evaluation and Inspection with Image Analysing Computer, Proceedings of the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, Feb. 1972, pp. 131-143.
Hermann, K-P et al., Poleythlene-based Water-equivalent Phantom Material for X-ray Dosimetry at Tube Voltages from 10 to 100kV, Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 30, No. 11, 1985, pp. 1195-1200.
Hermann, K-P et al., Muscle-and Fat-equivalent Polyethyl

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Display and analysis of medical images using calibrated... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Display and analysis of medical images using calibrated..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Display and analysis of medical images using calibrated... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3988186

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.