Segmentation method and system for scanned documents

Computer graphics processing and selective visual display system – Computer graphics processing – Attributes

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C382S266000

Reexamination Certificate

active

10776516

ABSTRACT:
Methods and systems include a dependent min-max module the receives image data and generates a dependent Min value and a dependent Max value within a window around a pixel of interest. A dynamic threshold module, based on the dependent Min and Max values, generates continuity data and enhanced data suitable for identifying, for example, blobs.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4685143 (1987-08-01), Choate
patent: 4849914 (1989-07-01), Medioni et al.
patent: 5515452 (1996-05-01), Penkethman et al.
patent: 5583659 (1996-12-01), Lee et al.
patent: 5684894 (1997-11-01), Shustorovich
patent: 5745596 (1998-04-01), Jefferson
patent: 5900953 (1999-05-01), Bottou et al.
patent: 6058214 (2000-05-01), Bottou et al.
patent: 6324305 (2001-11-01), Holladay et al.
patent: 6343154 (2002-01-01), Bottou et al.
patent: 6400844 (2002-06-01), Fan et al.
patent: 6633670 (2003-10-01), Matthews
patent: 2003/0132946 (2003-07-01), Gold
patent: 0 712 094 (1996-05-01), None
patent: 1 006 716 (2000-06-01), None
Castleman, “Digital Image Processing”, 1996, Prentice Hall, Inc., pp. 32-33, 447-485.
R. De Queiroz, “Compression of Compound Documents,”IEEE, Oct. 1999, pp. 209-213.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/187,499, filed Jul. 1, 2002, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/188,026, filed Jul. 1, 2002, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/188,249, filed Jul. 1, 2002, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/188,277, filed Jul. 1, 2002, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/188,157, filed Jul. 1, 2002, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/612,250, filed Jul. 1, 2003, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/612,057, filed Jul. 1, 2003, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/612,234, filed Jul. 1, 2003, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/612,461, filed Jul. 1, 2003, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/612,062, filed Jul. 1, 2003, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/612,261, filed Jul. 1, 2003, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/612,246, filed Jul. 1, 2003, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/612,368, filed Jul. 1, 2003, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/612,248, filed Jul. 1, 2003, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/612,063, filed Jul. 1, 2003, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/612,064, filed Jul. 1, 2003, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/612,084, filed Jul. 1, 2003, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/776,515, filed Feb. 12, 2004, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/776,514, filed Feb. 12, 2004, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/776,608, filed Feb. 12, 2004, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/776,602, filed Feb. 12, 2004, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/776,620, filed Feb. 12, 2004, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/776,603, filed Feb. 12, 2004, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/776,509, filed Feb. 12, 2004, Claassen et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/776,508, filed Feb. 12, 2004, Curry et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/776,612, filed Feb. 12, 2004, Curry et al.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Segmentation method and system for scanned documents does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Segmentation method and system for scanned documents, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Segmentation method and system for scanned documents will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3907202

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.