Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or... – Discount or incentive
Reexamination Certificate
2008-04-29
2008-04-29
Hafiz, Tariq R. (Department: 3623)
Data processing: financial, business practice, management, or co
Automated electrical financial or business practice or...
Discount or incentive
Reexamination Certificate
active
10093782
ABSTRACT:
A method and system for objectively determining potential success of a new project and similarity of the new project to historical projects. By defining a master set of processes, practices, and/or personnel available to be utilized by the new project, relationships may objectively be determined between the new and historical projects. Statistical information developed by the historical projects may be utilized to indicate potential success of the new project.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5189606 (1993-02-01), Burns et al.
patent: 5826252 (1998-10-01), Wolters et al.
patent: 5862252 (1999-01-01), Yamamoto et al.
patent: 5918219 (1999-06-01), Isherwood
patent: 6578004 (2003-06-01), Cimral et al.
patent: 6917921 (2005-07-01), Cimral et al.
patent: 7035809 (2006-04-01), Miller et al.
patent: 7158940 (2007-01-01), Cimral et al.
patent: 2003/0023470 (2003-01-01), Labbi
patent: 2003/0070157 (2003-04-01), Adams et al.
patent: 2003/0135399 (2003-07-01), Ahamparam et al.
patent: 2003/0208429 (2003-11-01), Bennett
Shepperd et al., Effort Estimation Using Analogy Proceedings of ICSE-18, IEEE, 1996, pp. 170-178.
Shepperd et al., Effort Estimation by Analogy: A Case Study ESCOM 7, 1996.
Shepperd et al., Estimating Software Project Effort Using Analogies IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 23, No. 12, Nov. 1997, pp. 736-743.
Mukhopadhyay et al., Examining the Feasibility of a Case-Based Reasoning Model for Software Effort Estimation MIS Quarterly, vol. 16, No. 2, Jun. 1992, pp. 155-171.
Simmons et al., Manager Associate IEEE Transactions On Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 5, No. 3, Jun. 1993, pp. 426-438.
Mair et al., An Investigation of Machine Learning Based Prediction Systems Empirical Software Engineering Research Group, Jul. 9, 1999.
Hefner, Rick, Managing Projects through a Corporate Repository Proceedings of the 33rdHawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, 2000.
Hastings T.E. et al., A Vector-Based Approach to Software Size Measurement and Effort Estimation IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vo. 27, No. 4, Apr. 2001, pp. 337-350.
Angelis L. et al., A Simulation Tool for Efficient Analogy Based Cost Estimation Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 5, No. 1, Mar. 2000, Abstract.
Miranda, Eduardo, Improving Subjective Estimates Using Paired Comparisons IEEE Software, Jan./Feb. 2001, pp. 87-91.
Kirsopp, Collin et al., Search Heuristics, Case-Based Reasoning and Software Project Effort Prediction GEECO 2002.
Shepperd, Automated Project Cost Estimations: Using Analogies, The ANGEL Project Jan. 2001, Retrieved from Archive.org Aug. 18, 2006.
Wikipedia.org—Linear algebra, Euclidean distance and vector space definitions Retrieved from Wikipedia.org Aug. 18, 2006.
Boehm et al., Software Cost Estimation with COCOMO II Prentice Hall PRT, 2000, ISBN: 0-13-026692-2.
Simmons et al., Software Measurement—A visualization toolkit Hewlett-Packard Professional Books, Prentice-Hall PTR, 1998, ISBN: 0-13-840695-2.
Roman, Daniel D., A Proposed Project Termination Audit Model IEEE Transactions onf Engineering Management, vol. EM30, No. 3, 1983, Abstract.
Collier, Bonnie et al., A Defined Project Postmortem Project Review IEEE Software, 1996, pp. 65-72.
Nolan, Andrew J., Learning from Success IEEE Software, Jan./Feb. 1999, pp. 97-105.
Hormozi, Amir H. et al., The Project Life Cycle: The Termination Phase S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, Winter 2000, vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 45-51.
Davis, John et al., Determining A Project Probability Of Success Research Technology Management, May/Jun. 2001, vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 51-57.
Martin, Paula K. et al., Close Out The Forgotten Phase Chemical Engineering Progress, Jan. 2002, vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 76-79.
von Zedtwitz, Maximiliam, Organizational learning throuh post-project reviews in R&D R&D Management vol. 32, No. 2, 2002, pp. 255-268.
Simmons et al., Software Measurement A Visualization Toolkit Hewlett-Packard Professional Books,1997, ISBN: 0-13-840695-2.
Hollman, John K., Project History—Closing the Look 1995 AACE Transactions.
Nelson, Anthony C. et al., Application of a matrix approach to estimate project skill requirements Information & Management, vol. 29, 1995, pp. 165-172.
Paulk, Mark C. et al., Capability Maturity Model for Software Version 1.1 Software Engineering Institure, 1996.
Belout, Adnane, Effects of human resource management on project effectiveness and success International Journal of Project Management, vol. 16, No. 1, 1998, pp. 21-26.
Hackos, Joann T., From Theory to Practice: Using the Information Process-Maturity Model as a Tool for Strategic Planning Technical Communication, Fourth Quarter 1997.
Dvir, D. et al., In search of project classification: a non-universal approach to project success factors Research Policy, vol. 27, 1998, pp. 915-935.
Poolton J. et al., The New Products Process: Effective Knowledge Capture and Utilisation Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, vol. 8, No. 2, Jun. 2000, pp. 133-143.
Thomas, Michael, Building and Managing a winning project team Manage, vol. 52, No. 1, Aug./Sep. 2000, pp. 4-5.
Mair, Carolyn et al., An investigation of machine learning based prediction systems The Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 53, 2000, pp. 23-29.
Leo, Douglas, Using Project History to Assure Project Success 2002 AACE International Transaction.
Payne, Stephen, How to Pick the Right People for the Project Data Communications, vol. 10, No. 11, Nov. 1981, Abstract.
Leo, Dougla, Project History Retrieval and History AACE Internal Transactions, 1999.
“The Big Picture”,The Economist, pp. 1-3; Geneva; Jan. 4, 2001; Internet, www.economist.com/displayStory.dfm?Story—ID=463720.
The Big Picture; www.economist.com; Jan. 4, 2001; pp. 1-3.
Chappel Oscar A.
Creel Christopher Taylor
Hafiz Tariq R.
Jarrett Scott L.
Perot Systems Corporation
Winstead PC
LandOfFree
Project management system and method for assessing... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Project management system and method for assessing..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Project management system and method for assessing... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3905331