System for providing feedback to evaluators

Details System for providing feedback to evaluators System for providing feedback to evaluators

2005-12-20

2005-12-20

Cheng, Joe H. (Department: 3713)

Education and demonstration

Question or problem eliciting response

C434S118000, C434S362000, C273S273000, C382S321000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06976847

ABSTRACT:
A method for increasing the speed at which data items are processed. The method receives electronic representation of data items and organizes the data items into separate groupings. The method next displays a particular grouping of data items to a resolver so that the resolver can evaluate the data items. In displaying the data items, the method uses a matrix of cells and displays one data item in each of the cells. The resolver can thus simultaneously view multiple data items, which facilitates efficient evaluations of the data items.

REFERENCES:
patent: 3405457 (1968-10-01), Bitzer
patent: 3538626 (1970-11-01), Frank
patent: 3762072 (1973-10-01), From
patent: 3932948 (1976-01-01), Goddard et al.
patent: 4004354 (1977-01-01), Yamauchi
patent: 4151659 (1979-05-01), Lien et al.
patent: 4205780 (1980-06-01), Burns et al.
patent: 4358277 (1982-11-01), Moyes et al.
patent: 4478584 (1984-10-01), Kaney
patent: 4518267 (1985-05-01), Hepp
patent: 4518361 (1985-05-01), Conway
patent: 4553261 (1985-11-01), Froessl
patent: 4627818 (1986-12-01), Von Fellenberg
patent: 4648062 (1987-03-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 4671772 (1987-06-01), Slade et al.
patent: 4694352 (1987-09-01), Ina et al.
patent: 4705479 (1987-11-01), Maron
patent: 4708503 (1987-11-01), Poor
patent: 4715818 (1987-12-01), Shapiro et al.
patent: 4741047 (1988-04-01), Sharpe, II
patent: 4760246 (1988-07-01), Shepard
patent: 4764120 (1988-08-01), Griffin et al.
patent: 4785472 (1988-11-01), Shapiro
patent: 4789543 (1988-12-01), Linder
patent: 4798543 (1989-01-01), Spiece
patent: 4845739 (1989-07-01), Katz
patent: 4867685 (1989-09-01), Brush et al.
patent: 4878175 (1989-10-01), Norden-Paul et al.
patent: 4895518 (1990-01-01), Arnold et al.
patent: 4908759 (1990-03-01), Alexander, Jr. et al.
patent: 4930077 (1990-05-01), Fan
patent: 4937439 (1990-06-01), Wanninger et al.
patent: 4958284 (1990-09-01), Bishop et al.
patent: 4978305 (1990-12-01), Kraft
patent: 4996642 (1991-02-01), Hey
patent: 5002491 (1991-03-01), Abrahamson et al.
patent: 5003613 (1991-03-01), Lovelady et al.
patent: 5011413 (1991-04-01), Ferris et al.
patent: 5023435 (1991-06-01), Deniger
patent: 5035625 (1991-07-01), Munson et al.
patent: 5038392 (1991-08-01), Morris et al.
patent: 5054096 (1991-10-01), Beizer
patent: 5058185 (1991-10-01), Morris et al.
patent: 5059127 (1991-10-01), Lewis et al.
patent: 5072383 (1991-12-01), Brimm et al.
patent: 5086385 (1992-02-01), Launey et al.
patent: 5100329 (1992-03-01), Deesen et al.
patent: 5101447 (1992-03-01), Sokoloff et al.
patent: 5103490 (1992-04-01), McMillin
patent: 5105354 (1992-04-01), Nishimura
patent: 5119433 (1992-06-01), Will
patent: 5134669 (1992-07-01), Keogh et al.
patent: 5140650 (1992-08-01), Casey et al.
patent: 5147205 (1992-09-01), Gross et al.
patent: 5151948 (1992-09-01), Lyke et al.
patent: 5176520 (1993-01-01), Hamilton
patent: 5180309 (1993-01-01), Egnor
patent: 5195033 (1993-03-01), Samph et al.
patent: 5204813 (1993-04-01), Samph et al.
patent: 5211564 (1993-05-01), Martinez et al.
patent: 5258855 (1993-11-01), Lech et al.
patent: 5259766 (1993-11-01), Sack et al.
patent: 5261823 (1993-11-01), Kurokawa
patent: RE34476 (1993-12-01), Norwood
patent: 5267865 (1993-12-01), Lee et al.
patent: 5294229 (1994-03-01), Hartzell et al.
patent: 5302132 (1994-04-01), Corder
patent: 5310349 (1994-05-01), Daniels et al.
patent: 5318450 (1994-06-01), Carver
patent: 5321611 (1994-06-01), Clark et al.
patent: 5344132 (1994-09-01), LeBrun et al.
patent: 5376007 (1994-12-01), Zirm
patent: 5379213 (1995-01-01), Derks
patent: 5387104 (1995-02-01), Corder
patent: 5416312 (1995-05-01), Lamoure
patent: 5418865 (1995-05-01), Bloomberg
patent: 5433615 (1995-07-01), Clark
patent: 5437554 (1995-08-01), Clark et al.
patent: 5437555 (1995-08-01), Ziv-El
patent: 5452379 (1995-09-01), Poor
patent: 5458493 (1995-10-01), Clark et al.
patent: 5466159 (1995-11-01), Clark et al.
patent: 5496175 (1996-03-01), Oyama et al.
patent: 5544255 (1996-08-01), Smithies et al.
patent: 5558521 (1996-09-01), Clark et al.
patent: 5565316 (1996-10-01), Kershaw et al.
patent: 5596698 (1997-01-01), Morgan
patent: 5634101 (1997-05-01), Blau
patent: 5647017 (1997-07-01), Smithies et al.
patent: 5672060 (1997-09-01), Poor
patent: 5690497 (1997-11-01), Clark et al.
patent: 5691895 (1997-11-01), Kurtzberg et al.
patent: 5709551 (1998-01-01), Clark et al.
patent: 5716213 (1998-02-01), Clark et al.
patent: 5718591 (1998-02-01), Clark et al.
patent: 5735694 (1998-04-01), Clark et al.
patent: 5752836 (1998-05-01), Clark et al.
patent: 5987149 (1999-11-01), Poor
patent: 5987302 (1999-11-01), Driscoll et al.
patent: 5991595 (1999-11-01), Romano et al.
patent: 6042384 (2000-03-01), Loiacono
patent: 6155839 (2000-12-01), Clark et al.
patent: 6157921 (2000-12-01), Barnhill
patent: 6159018 (2000-12-01), Clark et al.
patent: 6168440 (2001-01-01), Clark et al.
patent: 6183261 (2001-02-01), Clark et al.
patent: 6193521 (2001-02-01), Clark et al.
patent: 6256399 (2001-07-01), Poor
patent: 6466683 (2002-10-01), Poor
patent: 6558166 (2003-05-01), Clark et al.
patent: 6749435 (2004-06-01), Clark et al.
patent: 2003/0086586 (2003-05-01), Poor
patent: 2004/0086841 (2004-05-01), Clark et al.
patent: 2004/0202991 (2004-10-01), Clark et al.
patent: 0 171 663 (1986-02-01), None
patent: 2 274 932 (1994-08-01), None
patent: 56-10634 (1981-02-01), None
patent: 62-75578 (1987-04-01), None
patent: 3-1709 (1991-01-01), None
patent: 4-147288 (1992-05-01), None
patent: 5-74825 (1993-10-01), None
patent: WO 90/05970 (1990-05-01), None
patent: WO 99/06930 (1999-02-01), None
Author Unknown, ““Score Image” Processing of Constructed-Responses, Essays, and Writing Samples”,Uniscore, Incorporated:3 pages (1992).
Author unknown, “Image Processing of Open-Ended Questions”,Uniscore, Incorporated: 3 pages (1992).
Breland, H. et al. “Remote Scoring of Essays”,College Board Report, No. 88-3, ETS RR No. 88-4, 43 pages (1998).
Brown, P. et al., “Validation—Cost Effective External Evaluation”,Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2): 5 pages (1990).
Draper, S.W. et al.“Integrative evaluation: An Emerging role for classroom studies of CAL”, Internet: http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/˜steve/IE.html: 17 pages (Aug. 12, 1995).
Draper, S.W., “Observing, Measuring, or Evaluating Courseware”, Internet: http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/˜steve/Eval.HE.html: 10 pages (Feb. 18, 1996).
Foxon, M., “Evaluation of training and development programs: A review of the literature”,Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2): 16 pages (1989).
Gathy, P. et al., “Computer-Assisted Self-Assessment (CASA) in Histology”,Computers&Education, 17(2): Front cover and 109-116 (1991).
IBM Personal Science Laboratory (PSL), IBM Tools For Education, 12 pages (1990).
IBM Education Local Area Network and Tools (EdLaN), Tools for education: 16 pages (1991).
IBM PS/2® MultiMedia for Microscopic Studies, 4 pages (1991).
IBM Multimedia Supplement to T.H.E. Journal, Special Issue, 41 pages (Sep. 1991).
IBM Software for Education Catalogue, Pre-kindergarten to Adult Tools for Education, 86 pages, 1991/92 Edition.
Kool, L., “The Scribophone: a graphic telecommunication system”,Philips Telecommunications Review, vol. 38, No. 1, 11 pages (Jan. 1980).
Sims, R., “Future for Computer-Based Training: Developing the learner-computer interface”,Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 4(2): 11 pages (1988).
Uniscore Proposal No. 92-11, to Delaware Department of Public Instruction (May 15, 1992).
Complaint -Patent Infringement and Willful Patent Infringment, Jul. 10, 1998, pp. 1-29, Civil Action No. 98-CV-3568, District of Pennsylvania, Meadowbrook Industries, Ltd. vs. National Computer Systems, Inc.
Answer and Counterclaim, Aug. 14, 1998, pp. 1-9, Civil Action No. 98-CV-3568, District of Pennsylvania, Meadowbrook Industries, Ltd. vs. National Computer Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff's Answer to Defendant National Computer Systems, Inc. Counterclaim, Sep. 14, 1998, pp.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

System for providing feedback to evaluators does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with System for providing feedback to evaluators, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System for providing feedback to evaluators will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3465844