Stock material or miscellaneous articles – Structurally defined web or sheet – Continuous and nonuniform or irregular surface on layer or...
Reexamination Certificate
2000-07-21
2004-08-24
Watkins, III, William P. (Department: 1772)
Stock material or miscellaneous articles
Structurally defined web or sheet
Continuous and nonuniform or irregular surface on layer or...
C428S141000, C428S149000, C216S011000, C216S041000, C216S042000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06780491
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the fabrication of microstructures on a substrate and, in particular, to processes for fabricating masks for the fabrication of microstructures, such as emitter tips for field emission displays, on a substrate.
The fabrication of micron and sub-micron structures or patterns into the surface of a substrate typically involves a lithographic process to transfer patterns from a mask onto the surface of the material. Such fabrication is of particular importance in the electronics industry, where the material is often a semiconductor.
Generally, the surface of the substrate is coated with a resist, which is a radiation-sensitive material. A projecting radiation, such as light or X-rays, is then passed through a mask onto the resist. The portions of the resist that are exposed to the radiation are chemically altered, changing their susceptibility to dissolution by a solvent. The resist is then developed by treating the resist with the solvent, which dissolves and removes the portions that are susceptible to dissolution by the solvent. This leaves a pattern of exposed substrate corresponding to the mask.
Next, the substrate is exposed to a liquid or gaseous etchant, which etches those portions that are not masked by the remaining resist. This leaves a pattern in the substrate that corresponds to the mask. Finally, the remaining resist is stripped off the substrate, leaving the substrate surface with the etched pattern corresponding to the mask.
Another method useful for fabricating certain types of devices involves the use of a wet dispense of colloidal particles. An example of this technique is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,407,695, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. With the wet dispense method, a layer of colloidal particles contained in solution is disposed over the surface of a substrate. Typically, this is done though a spin-coating process, in which the substrate is spun at a high rate of speed while the colloidal solution is applied to the surface. The spinning of the substrate distributes the solution across the surface of the substrate.
The particles themselves serve as an etchant, or deposition, mask. If the substrate is subject to ion milling, each particle will mask off an area of the substrate directly underneath it. Therefore, the etched pattern formed in the substrate surface is typically an array of posts or columns corresponding to the pattern of particles.
Although the wet dispense method has some advantages over the lithographic process, it has its own deficiencies. For example, the spinning speed must be precisely controlled. If the spin speed is too low, then a multilayer coating will result, instead of the desired monolayer of colloidal particles. On the other hand, if the spin speed is too high, then gaps will occur in the coating. Further, owing to the very nature of the process, a radial nonuniformity is difficult to overcome with this method.
Another problem with colloidal coating methods is that they require precise control of the chemistry of the colloidal solution so that the colloidal particles will adhere to the substrate surface. For example, if the colloidal particles are suspended in water, the pH of the water must be controlled to generate the required surface chemistry between the colloidal particles and the substrate. However, it is not always desirable to alter the pH or other chemical properties of the colloidal solution. Also, if the colloidal solution fails to wet the surface of the substrate, the particle coating may not be uniform.
In addition, wet dispense methods tend to be expensive and prone to contaminating the substrate.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention, dry particles coat a substrate, forming a pattern for etching the substrate. In a preferred embodiment, both the substrate and the particles are electrically charged, so as to create an electrostatic attraction. The dry particles are projected through a nozzle onto the substrate with a carrier gas that is not reactive with the particles or the substrate, such as nitrogen or a chlorofluorocarbon. Preferably, the dry particles are beads made from latex or glass.
The dry particles are etch resistant and serve as an etching mask. The substrate is etched, leaving columns under the particles. The columns can be further refined, for example, by shaping them into emitter tips for a field emission display.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3556255 (1971-01-01), Lomax, Jr.
patent: 3895127 (1975-07-01), Comizzoli
patent: 4407695 (1983-10-01), Deckman et al.
patent: 4664748 (1987-05-01), Ueno et al.
patent: 4715989 (1987-12-01), Sullivan et al.
patent: 4806202 (1989-02-01), Tang et al.
patent: 5312514 (1994-05-01), Kumar
patent: 5399238 (1995-03-01), Kumar
patent: 5411630 (1995-05-01), Nagase et al.
patent: 5503880 (1996-04-01), Matschke
patent: 5510156 (1996-04-01), Zhao
patent: 5588894 (1996-12-01), Jin et al.
patent: 5665422 (1997-09-01), Endo et al.
patent: 5676853 (1997-10-01), Alwan
patent: 5945213 (1999-08-01), Nagaike et al.
patent: 362152676 (1987-07-01), None
Advanced Display Systems, Inc., Richardson, Texas, “ASDM-05 Automatic Spacer Distributor Machine,” No Date. (As cited in the parent application, now U.S. patent No. 6,110,394, and grandparent application, now U.S. patent No. 5,817,373).
Thesis by Mark Allen Gilmore, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, Jul. 30, 1992, “The Application of Field Emitter Arrays to Gaseous Ion Production,” pp. 1-107.
Alwan James J.
Cathey David A.
Tjaden Kevin
Chevalier Alicia
Micro)n Technology, Inc.
TraskBritt
Watkins III William P.
LandOfFree
Microstructures including hydrophilic particles does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Microstructures including hydrophilic particles, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Microstructures including hydrophilic particles will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3344094