Dentistry – Apparatus – Having intra-oral dispensing means
Reexamination Certificate
2002-03-25
2004-08-31
Wilson, John J (Department: 3732)
Dentistry
Apparatus
Having intra-oral dispensing means
C433S082000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06783365
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a handpiece filter unit for a dental instrument designed for use inside a patient's mouth, and in particular, to an in-line disk filter and filter handpiece for the type of a dental instrument that delivers water within a patient's mouth.
2. Description of Related Art
Dentists often use instruments, such as handpieces, ultrasonic scalers, or syringes, that deliver water and air into a patient's mouth during the course of a dental procedure. A pressing concern in the use of such instruments is the risk of infection created by disease-causing microorganisms (pathogens) which build up over the course of time in both the dental unit water line (DUWL) that supplies the instrument and in the tips of the instruments themselves. The DUWL typically extends from the dental instrument to a water source originating either from the municipal water supply or from bottled supplies within the dentist's office. Contamination is particularly promoted within DUWL's because the water in these lines is frequently stagnant since the water flows only when the instrument is in use. There are two principal sources of instrument contamination. The first source of contamination is the pathogens found in the water supply that attach themselves to the walls of the DUWL's. The second source of contamination is the pathogens that are sucked into the instrument and DUWL due to backflow from the patient's mouth (the point of use).
The way in which DUWL's become contaminated is well known. Basic principles of fluid mechanics dictate that zones of stagnation form around the perimeter of a DUWL. These zones exist because the velocity of flowing water is zero at the walls of the tube. In the absence of agitation, microorganisms breed and flourish in the form of thin biofilms. Found among these organisms are pathogens such as legionella, pseudomonas, and mycobacteria. Biofilms occasionally break off from the walls of the DUWL and float downstream into a patient's mouth, greatly increasing the risk of infection. Backflow is another significant source of pathogens. Backflow occurs when some of an infected patient's fluids are sucked into the tip of the instrument, eventually contaminating the entire instrument. The risk of pathogen transmission and infection becomes especially significant when immuno-compromised patients, such as HIV-positive victims and cancer victims, are exposed to water from the DUWL.
Conventional methods of sterilization fail to prevent the breeding and growth of pathogens in DUWL's. Simple liquid flushing does not solve the problem, as the biofilms are generally unaffected by flowing liquid. Likewise, flushing with biocide or other decontaminants is ineffective as many organisms are resistant to these chemical treatments. Finally, use of purified water sources to minimize the contaminants in the entering water flow is not a viable solution because pathogens multiply rapidly once the seal on the water supply is opened.
Autoclaving is the most effective method of contaminant control. Although the instrument or instrument head usually is detachable and therefore suitable for autoclaving, the DUWL's generally are not detachable and are too long and unwieldy to be autoclaved. In addition, DUWL's usually are not designed to withstand this sort of treatment.
Several attempts at filtering water flowing via the DUWL through the instrument have proven cumbersome and economically inefficient.
In Hansen, U.S. Pat. No. 4,950,159, a disposable cartridge filter is disclosed which uses activated charcoal in the filter. This material is ill suited for filtering the water in the DUWL because the pore size of activated charcoal is too large to effectively filter out pathogens.
In Johnston, et. al, U.S. Pat. No. 5,204,004, the filter is not placed in the handle and the DUWL must be cut in order to install a new filter. These limitations are likely to make the instrument cumbersome for a dentist to use and time-consuming to replace. Due to the position of the filter, it does not solve the backflow problem without the use of a separate check-valve or the chemical disinfection of the DUWL between patients, thus adding cost and complexity to its use.
In Dalrymple, et. al, U.S. Pat. No. 5,474,451, a series of air/water filter housings are disclosed. However, the filtering mechanisms entail a multivalent iodine resin/halogen scavenging system. The cost of this scheme precludes frequent replacement and disposal of the filter cartridges. In addition, several of the preferred water treatment embodiments require a filter manifold approximately two inches in length which makes the dental instrument unwieldy. This unwieldiness undercuts the purpose of dental instruments designed for easy manipulation within a patient's mouth. This approach also introduces chemicals into the water which is delivered to the patient's mouth.
In Wolf, et. al, U.S. Pat. No. 5,556,279, the filter is based on a chemical method of decontamination, thus making the filters more expensive and not amenable to frequent disposal. As in Dalrymple, this approach also introduces chemicals into the water which is delivered to the patient's mouth.
In Kinsel, U.S. Pat. No. 5,554,025, the filter is placed very close to the tip of the instrument, in close proximity to the point of use. While this is beneficial for decontamination purposes, it can make the instrument unwieldy due to the location of the filter housing. In addition, the proposed filter design is not suitable for the actual physical orientation of liquid and air tubes in a DUWL. This approach requires the entire filter and housing to be disposed of when changing filters, thus adding to cost. Also, while Kinsel's filter arrangement might be suitable for a dental syringe, it might not be suitable for a handpiece due to the greater volume of water required to cool a handpiece.
Novak, U.S. Pat. No. 5,716,210, is similar to the present invention in that there is a section inserted between the DUWL and the dental unit, which contains a filter. In Novak, each of the conduits pass through the filter cartridge, which makes the cartridge more complicated to machine and produce. The filter cartridge is disposable, not autoclavable.
In Hansen, U.S. Pat. No. 5,897,317, the filter cartridge is disposable. The filter cartridge filters, water, air, and the exhaust through a combination of filters. There are three cavities in the filter cartridge. The first cavity holds a filter for filtering air, the second cavity holds a filter for filtering water, and the third cavity holds a filter for filtering the exhaust. This configuration of the filter cartridge is potentially complicated and expensive to manufacture.
In Kipke et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,908,296, a syringe includes a replaceable device for purifying water. The water-purifying device consists of disinfecting iodide beads in the tip of the syringe.
In Johnston et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,961,326, a one-way valve protects a dental patient from bacteria. The valve is preferably combined with a filter. The valve is installed in the water line itself, and the waterline must be cut each time a new valve is installed. This limitation is likely to make the instrument cumbersome for a dentist to use and time-consuming to replace.
The presence and potential harm of pathogens in DUWL's and dental instruments are well documented and the American Dental Association has called for a solution.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,971,757, by the present inventors, discloses a disk or membrane type filter placed in an autoclavable filter unit in the handle of an existing design dental instrument such that the form and function of the dental instrument are not adversely affected. The filter unit, which fits in-line between the dental unit and the water line fitting, includes two portions that are detachably connected by an annular sleeve. When connected, a recess between the portions forms a recess that holds a microfiltration disk filt
Friedman Mark
Seltzer Alan
Brown & Michaels PC
Wilson John J
LandOfFree
Dental handpiece having internal filter unit does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Dental handpiece having internal filter unit, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Dental handpiece having internal filter unit will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3309701