Brushing – scrubbing – and general cleaning – Machines – With air blast or suction
Reexamination Certificate
2002-05-09
2004-05-18
Snider, Theresa T. (Department: 1744)
Brushing, scrubbing, and general cleaning
Machines
With air blast or suction
C015S383000, C015S353000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06735811
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to mobile hard floor surface cleaners and, more particularly, to a controlled cleaning liquid dispensing system for use in a hard floor surface cleaner.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Hard floor surface cleaners are widely used to clean the floors of industrial and commercial buildings. They range in size from a small model that is controlled by an operator walking behind and may clean a path ranging from 15 inches to 36 inches wide, to a large model that is controlled by an operator riding on the machine and can clean a path as wide as 5 feet. These hard floor cleaners include motorized drive wheels, a solution tank to hold a cleaning solution and a recovery tank to hold soiled cleaning solution recovered from the floor being scrubbed. The cleaning solution from the solution tank is applied to the hard floor surface adjacent a scrub head. The scrub head generally contains one or more motorized scrubbing brushes attached either in front of, under, or behind the vehicle. These scrubbing brushes typically rotate to provide the desired scrubbing action. The soiled cleaning solution is then recovered using a solution recovery system, which returns the soiled cleaning solution to the recovery tank.
The cleaning solution is typically gravity fed to the scrub head at a rate that varies in response to the volume of cleaning solution contained in the solution tank. As the volume of cleaning solution contained in the solution tank decreases, the rate at which the cleaning solution is fed to the scrub head decreases. For example, a typical hard floor cleaner having a 32 inch wide scrubbing swath applies the cleaning solution to the hard floor surface at a rate that varies from between approximately 1.0 gallons per minute (GPM) when the solution tank is full to a rate of 0.5 GPM when the tank contains a low volume of cleaning solution.
One problem with prior art hard floor cleaners has been their limited operational runtime. This is primarily due to their limited solution tank volume and the high cleaning solution flow rates. For example, a typical 32 inch cleaning swath hard floor surface cleaner has an operational runtime based on solution capacity of approximately 30-40 minutes.
One possible solution to increase runtime for these cleaners is to increase the size of the solution tank. Unfortunately, an increase in cleaning solution capacity typically necessitates modifications to the frame and other components of the hard floor surface cleaner, which results in additional weight and energy requirements for the device. For most applications, these modifications are simply impractical.
The high volume flow rate of cleaning solution is generally desired to provide complete wetting of the floor being cleaned. Unfortunately, the lack of control of the volume flow rate of the cleaning solution results in an excessive amount of cleaning solution being distributed to the floor, when, for example, the solution tank is full. The high volume flow rate of the cleaning solution of prior art hard floor surface cleaners also results in extended downtime. The long downtime periods are generally due to the numerous disposals of soiled cleaning solution and refills of cleaning solution that must be performed for a given job. Additionally, where the cleaning process removes harmful or hazardous chemicals, the disposal of the soiled cleaning solution may require special handling and/or additional costs to ensure that it is disposed of properly. As a result, the large volumes of cleaning solution that are used by prior art hard floor surface cleaners reduce the efficiency at which a cleaning job can be performed.
As a result, prior art hard floor surface cleaners suffer from several deficiencies that lead to inefficient floor cleaning operations. Most of these deficiencies stem from the poor control of the flow rate of cleaning solution as applied to the hard floor surface.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to a cleaning liquid dispensing system for use in a mobile hard floor surface cleaner that provides a substantially constant flow of cleaning liquid that can be provided to the scrubbing components of the cleaner. This results in more efficient use of the cleaning liquid, longer operational runtimes and shorter downtime. The cleaning liquid dispensing system includes fluid conduit in fluid communication with a supply of cleaning liquid, a pump, and a flow restriction member. The pump is adapted to drive a flow of the cleaning liquid through the conduit. The flow restriction member generates a pressure drop in the conduit, thereby restricting the flow of the cleaning liquid therethrough.
Other features and benefits that characterize embodiments of the present invention will be apparent upon reading the following detailed description and review of the associated drawings.
REFERENCES:
patent: 2563151 (1951-08-01), Bjorksten
patent: 2731659 (1956-01-01), Coplen
patent: 2993494 (1961-07-01), Svensson
patent: 3037887 (1962-10-01), Brenner et al.
patent: 3078190 (1963-02-01), Blaser et al.
patent: 3162427 (1964-12-01), Knudson et al.
patent: 3212762 (1965-10-01), Carroll et al.
patent: 3231134 (1966-01-01), Webster
patent: 3392418 (1968-07-01), Schowalter
patent: 3436262 (1969-04-01), Crowe et al.
patent: 3453678 (1969-07-01), Gehman et al.
patent: 3490948 (1970-01-01), Farison
patent: 3535162 (1970-10-01), Bray et al.
patent: 3549420 (1970-12-01), Cunningham
patent: 3655096 (1972-04-01), Easter
patent: 3676889 (1972-07-01), Edlin
patent: 3761987 (1973-10-01), Nayfa et al.
patent: 3774262 (1973-11-01), Anthony et al.
patent: 3789449 (1974-02-01), MacFarland et al.
patent: 3823727 (1974-07-01), Fry
patent: 3931662 (1976-01-01), Nayfa et al.
patent: 3940826 (1976-03-01), Phillips et al.
patent: 4000536 (1977-01-01), Nayfa et al.
patent: 4061001 (1977-12-01), Von der Eltz et al.
patent: 4107075 (1978-08-01), Kramer
patent: 4133773 (1979-01-01), Simmons
patent: 4167798 (1979-09-01), Klügl et al.
patent: 4167799 (1979-09-01), Webb
patent: 4191590 (1980-03-01), Sundheim
patent: 4369544 (1983-01-01), Parisi
patent: 4393538 (1983-07-01), Olson
patent: 4413769 (1983-11-01), Michetti
patent: 4419141 (1983-12-01), Kunkel
patent: 4429432 (1984-02-01), Copeland et al.
patent: 4511486 (1985-04-01), Shah
patent: 4570856 (1986-02-01), Groth et al.
patent: 4595420 (1986-06-01), Williams, III et al.
patent: 4667364 (1987-05-01), Meili
patent: 4676287 (1987-06-01), Fitzwater
patent: 4676926 (1987-06-01), Kappler
patent: 4780243 (1988-10-01), Edgley et al.
patent: 4819676 (1989-04-01), Blehert et al.
patent: 4822431 (1989-04-01), Bricher et al.
patent: 4849027 (1989-07-01), Simmons
patent: 4881288 (1989-11-01), May et al.
patent: 4974618 (1990-12-01), Nysted
patent: 5031837 (1991-07-01), Hanish
patent: 5060342 (1991-10-01), Brazier
patent: 5133107 (1992-07-01), MacDonald
patent: 5213120 (1993-05-01), Dickson
patent: 5383605 (1995-01-01), Teague
patent: 5462607 (1995-10-01), Mestetsky et al.
patent: 5509972 (1996-04-01), Akazawa et al.
patent: 5566422 (1996-10-01), Geyer
patent: 5593091 (1997-01-01), Harris
patent: 5649643 (1997-07-01), Ridgeway
patent: 5813086 (1998-09-01), Ueno et al.
patent: 5853814 (1998-12-01), Murphy
patent: 5871152 (1999-02-01), Saney
patent: 6090217 (2000-07-01), Kittle
patent: 6209756 (2001-04-01), Van Der Heijden
patent: 6276613 (2001-08-01), Kramer
patent: 6418586 (2002-07-01), Fulghum
patent: 44 13 783 (1995-03-01), None
patent: 0 744 148 (1996-11-01), None
patent: 1 044 645 (2000-10-01), None
patent: 11216092 (1999-08-01), None
patent: WO 95/09557 (1995-04-01), None
patent: WO 00/35333 (2000-06-01), None
patent: WO 02/05047 (2002-01-01), None
patent: WO 02/06435 (2002-01-01), None
International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US 02/19367, filed Jun. 17, 2002, dated Dec. 12, 2002.
International Search Report from the European Patent Office for International Application No. PCT/US 02/23823, dated Mar. 13, 2003.
Discover Magazine, Jun. 2002, “Does the Universe Exist if We Don't Observe It
Christensen Bryan
Field Bruce F.
Krueger Joseph K.
Pierce Richard M.
Seifert James J.
Snider Theresa T.
Tennant Company
Westman Champlin & Kelly
LandOfFree
Cleaning liquid dispensing system for a hard floor surface... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Cleaning liquid dispensing system for a hard floor surface..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Cleaning liquid dispensing system for a hard floor surface... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3256695