Invaplex from gram negative bacteria, method of purification...

Chemistry: natural resins or derivatives; peptides or proteins; – Proteins – i.e. – more than 100 amino acid residues – Blood proteins or globulins – e.g. – proteoglycans – platelet...

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C530S388200, C530S388400, C530S350000, C424S130100, C424S141100, C424S150100, C424S164100, C435S329000, C435S332000, C435S340000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06680374

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention provides a novel method for purifying Invaplex, a novel composition comprising at least one invasin protein i.e. a protein essential for the process by which a bacterium enters a host cell, and lipopolysaccharide from invasive gram negative bacteria. The composition of the present invention can be used as an adjuvant for vaccines, biochemical, or other substances, and as a diagnostic tool.
INTRODUCTION
Bacillary dysentery is caused by members of the genus Shigella and also enteroinvasive
Escherichia coli
(EIEC). Shigellosis is found in all parts of the world with developing countries accounting for the large majority of cases. A recent report in the Bulletin of the World Health Organization estimates that in developing countries, for children 0-4 years old, there were 113 million Shigella episodes per year and an additional 50 million cases per year in all other age groups. In industrialized countries it is estimated that there are approximately 1.5 million cases of shigellosis per year (Kotloff et al. 1999,
WHO
77, 651-666). The rampant occurance of antibiotic resistance in Shigella spp. and the high incidence of this disease underscores the need for a vaccine against this human pathogen. However at the present time a vaccine is not commercially available for bacillary dysentery.
The pathogenesis of Shigella is attributed to this organism's ability to invade, reside, and replicate intracellularly within the colonic epithelium. The invasion of host cells by Shigella spp. is a complex multifactorial event in which many different bacterial proteins are involved. Many of the genes for key Shigella virulence proteins are encoded on a large 140 Mdal plasmid. Several of the plasmid encoded proteins called the invasion plasmid antigens (IpaA, IpaB, IpaC, and IpaD proteins) (Buysse et al., 1987,
J. Bacteriol.
169, 2561-2569) are essential virulence factors. Similar proteins, called Sip proteins, are made by members of the genus Salmonella (Kaniga et al., 1995,
J. Bacteriol.
95, 3965-3971). Upon contact or attachment to host cells, the Shigella invasins induce a phagocytic event which results in engulfment and internalization of the bacterium by the host cell. Recent reports have identified that IpaB and IpaC form a complex that can be found in the growth medium of Shigella cultures (Menard et al., 1998,
EMBO J
13, 5293-5302; Watari et al. 1995,
EMBO J
14, 2461-2470). The components of this complex are involved in the invasion process, but the actual mechanisms have not been defined (Menard et al., 1994,
Cell
79:515-525). In addition, purified IpaC has been shown to bind to host cells and participate in the uptake of avirulent shigellae by host cells (Marquart et al.,
Infect Immun.
64:4182-4187, 1996). Involvement in the attachment process and a possible role in the induction of phagocytosis suggests that the invasins or the invasin complex (if it can be isolated) would have adjuvant properties similar to cholera toxin, which also exhibits binding and internalization properties. Furthermore, IpaB, IpaC and IpaD, along with LPS are known major antigens that individuals respond to after infection with shigellae (Li et al. 1993,
Scand. J. Infect. Dis.
25, 569-577; Oaks et al., 1986,
Infect. Immun.
53, 57-63; van DeVerg et al. 1992,
J. Infect. Dis.
166, 158-161). Monkeys or humans infected with shigellae produce antibodies predominantly to IpaB and IpaC, and also produce antibodies at high frequencey to IpaA, IpaD and VirG (another plasmid encoded virulence protein involved in intercellular spreading) (Oaks et al., 1986, supra; Lett et al., 1989,
J. Bacteriol.
171, 353-359). It is not known if the immune response to the Shigella invasins or more specifically to the invasin complex is crucial to protective immunity.
Adjuvanticity Overview
Many proteins, carbohydrates, and even nucleic acids are not able to induce an immune response in animals unless they are coadministered with an adjuvant. An adjuvant, by definition, is an agent that increases specific immune responses to an antigen that would otherwise be incapable of eliciting an immune response. There are many different types of adjuvants, including aluminum salts (alum), cytokines, surface active agents, and various bacterial products such as Fruend's adjuvant or
Vibrio cholerae
and
E. coli
enterotoxins. Effectiveness of an adjuvant is often dependent upon its ability to stabilize epitope conformation, preserve the antigen from rapid clearance and degradation, and to target the antigen to surface receptors on antigen-presenting cells. Of all the established adjuvants only cholera toxin (CT) and the
E. coli
labile toxin (LT) are purified proteins capable of inducing a potent humoral and mucosal immune response, specifically IgA. In the case of CT, a Th2 T cell response occurs which is characterized by increased levels of IL-4 and IL-5. Among other things, these cytokines lead to increased levels of certain classes of immunoglobulins. Th2 responses are often characterized by higher levels of IgA and the IgG1 subclass of IgG. The ability to stimulate a mucosal immune response is a highly desirable property, as most adjuvants are used primarily for systemic immunizations and produce little to no secretory immunity. Unfortunately, CT and LT are toxic molecules and have required genetic modifications to render these adjuvants safe and effective.
In contrast to adjuvants, immunological “carriers” are usually proteins that have haptens or weakly immunogenic molecules covalently attached or genetically incorporated. In addition, living organisms are often used to carry or deliver foreign antigens to the host. Carriers provide T cell help to the antigen and thereby promote the immune response to the antigen.
A safe, effective mucosal adjuvant is desperately needed to promote the immune response to a multitude of new antigens becoming available due to recombinant DNA technology. Delivery of these antigens in a manner which promotes a protective immune response to pathogens depends in large parton an effective adjuvant.
One of the most elusive aspects to understanding how an infected host responds to a pathogen is the indentification of a specific immune response which correlates with protection against future disease. The quest for vaccines to a multitude of pathogens often goes astray because this one single, basic understanding of the immune response to a particular pathogen is not known. In the case of most enteric pathogens this is true.
The primary method for identifying correlates of a protective immune response is the development of a laboratory assay to assess the immune response in infected individuals. A multitude of different assay formats can be used but more often than not it is the antigen used in these assays which is critical. Assays for measuring antibodies, circulating antibody-secreting cells, T cells, cytokines, and other immune effectors are possible.
In the case of Shigella an assay which measures an antibody response which correlates with a protective immune response has not been developed. ELISAs are available for LPS and also the virulence proteins (Ipa proteins) of shigella. However, it has not been possible with any of these assays to demonstrate that a positive antibody response correlates with protection from future disease. The development of an assay which measures an antibody response that correlates with protection will expedite the development and testing of Shigella vaccines. It will also aid in the assessment of a person's immune status with respect to Shigella.
Therefore, there is a need for a diagnostic tool which detects different gram negative bacteria and can measure an antibody response which correlates with protection against future disease.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention fulfills the needs described above. In this application is described a novel composition comprising at least one invasin protein, a protein essential for bacterial invasion of a host cell, such as IpaA, IpaB, IpaC, and IpaD for Shigella.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Invaplex from gram negative bacteria, method of purification... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Invaplex from gram negative bacteria, method of purification..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Invaplex from gram negative bacteria, method of purification... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3242775

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.