Communications: directive radio wave systems and devices (e.g. – Determining distance – Phase comparison
Reexamination Certificate
2002-05-13
2004-01-20
Gregory, Bernarr E. (Department: 3662)
Communications: directive radio wave systems and devices (e.g.,
Determining distance
Phase comparison
C342S02500R, C342S061000, C342S062000, C342S063000, C342S064000, C342S065000, C342S118000, C342S120000, C342S147000, C342S156000, C342S175000, C342S194000, C342S195000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06680691
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to radar systems, and more specifically to a radar system which is capable of synchronization with a digital elevation map (DEM) to accurately determine a location.
The proper navigation of an aircraft in all phases of its flight is based to a large extent upon the ability to determine the terrain and position over which the aircraft is passing. In this regard, instrumentation, such as radar systems, and altimeters in combination with the use of accurate electronic terrain maps, which provide the height of objects on a map, aid in the flight path of the aircraft. Electronic terrain maps are well known and are presently used to assist in the navigation of aircraft.
Pulse radar altimeters demonstrate superior altitude accuracy due to their inherent leading edge return signal tracking capability. The pulse radar altimeter transmits a pulse of radio frequency (RF) energy, and a return echo is received and tracked using a tracking system. The interval of time between signal bursts of a radar system is called the pulse repetition interval (PRI). The frequency of bursts is called the pulse repetition frequency (PRF) and is the reciprocal of PRI.
FIG. 1
shows an aircraft
2
with the Doppler effect illustrated by isodops as a result of selection by the use of Doppler filters. The area between the isodops of the Doppler configuration will be referred to as swaths. The Doppler filter, and resulting isodops are well known in this area of technology and will not be explained in any further detail. Further, the aircraft
2
in the specification will be assumed to have a vertical velocity of zero. As is known, if a vertical velocity exists, the median
8
of the Doppler effect will shift depending on the vertical velocity. If the aircraft
2
has a vertical velocity in a downward direction, the median of the Doppler would shift to the right of the figure. If the aircraft
2
has a vertical velocity in an upward direction, the Doppler would shift to the left of the figure. Again, it will be assumed in the entirety of the specification that the vertical velocity is zero for the ease of description. However, it is known that a vertical velocity almost always exists.
Radar illuminates a ground patch bounded by the antenna beam
10
from an aircraft
2
.
FIG. 1
a shows a top view of the beam
10
along with the Doppler effect and
FIG. 1
b
shows the transmission of the beam
10
from a side view. To scan a particular area, range gates are used to further partition the swath created by the Doppler filter. To scan a certain Doppler swath, many radar range gates operate in parallel. With the range to each partitioned area determined, a record is generated representing the contour of the terrain below the flight path. The electronic maps are used with the contour recording to determine the aircraft's position on the electronic map. This system is extremely complex with all the components involved as well as the number of multiple range gates that are required to cover a terrain area. As a result, the computations required for this system are very extensive.
In addition to the complexity, the precision and accuracy of the distance to a particular ground area or object has never been attained using an airborne radar processor.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In one aspect, a phase processor configured to receive processed radar return data from a left radar channel, a right radar channel, and an ambiguous radar channel is provided. The phase processor comprises a plurality of phase detectors each comprising an input and a reference input. The phase detectors are each configured to determine a phase difference between radar return data received at said input and radar return data received at said reference input.
In another aspect, a method for processing radar return data is provided. The radar return data includes radar return data received at each of a right radar channel, a left radar channel, and an ambiguous radar channel. The method comprises receiving the radar return data at a phase processor and determining phase differences between the left, right, and ambiguous radar channels.
In still another aspect, a radar signal processing circuit is provided. The processing circuit comprises a radar gate correlation circuit configured to sample radar return data from left, right, and ambiguous radar channels at a sampling rate, a correlation bass pass filter configured to stretch the sampled radar return data to a continuous wave (CW) signal, and a mixer configured to down sample an in-phase component and a quadrature component of the CW signal to a doppler frequency. Also, the processing circuit comprises a band pass filter centered on the doppler frequency and a phase processor configured to receive processed radar return data from the band pass filter. The phase processor comprises a plurality of phase detectors each comprising an input and a reference input, each phase detector configured to determine a phase difference between radar return data received at the input and radar return data received at the reference input.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3728727 (1973-04-01), Botwin et al.
patent: 3735399 (1973-05-01), Sletten et al.
patent: 4164036 (1979-08-01), Wax
patent: 4310894 (1982-01-01), Lee et al.
patent: 4328495 (1982-05-01), Thue
patent: 4553221 (1985-11-01), Hyatt
patent: 4684950 (1987-08-01), Long
patent: 4851852 (1989-07-01), Bjorke et al.
patent: 5107268 (1992-04-01), Sturm et al.
patent: 5140331 (1992-08-01), Aulenbacher et al.
patent: 5150125 (1992-09-01), Hager
patent: 5173706 (1992-12-01), Urkowitz
patent: 5264853 (1993-11-01), Sturm et al.
patent: 5309161 (1994-05-01), Urkowitz et al.
patent: 5389931 (1995-02-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 5477226 (1995-12-01), Hager et al.
patent: 5485157 (1996-01-01), Long
patent: 5589833 (1996-12-01), Randall et al.
patent: 5767802 (1998-06-01), Kosowsky et al.
patent: 5867119 (1999-02-01), Corrubia et al.
patent: 5892462 (1999-04-01), Tran
patent: 5894286 (1999-04-01), Morand et al.
patent: 5945926 (1999-08-01), Ammar et al.
patent: 5969667 (1999-10-01), Farmer et al.
patent: 6011505 (2000-01-01), Poehler et al.
patent: 6025800 (2000-02-01), Hager
patent: 6114984 (2000-09-01), McNiff
patent: 6125155 (2000-09-01), Lesthievent et al.
patent: 6148195 (2000-11-01), Schuchman et al.
patent: 6232910 (2001-05-01), Bell et al.
patent: 6260052 (2001-07-01), Song
patent: 6264143 (2001-07-01), Massonnet
patent: 6297764 (2001-10-01), Wormington et al.
patent: 6337888 (2002-01-01), Huang et al.
patent: 6362775 (2002-03-01), Goeber et al.
patent: 6362776 (2002-03-01), Hager et al.
patent: 6377214 (2002-04-01), Melville et al.
Burlet Todd R.
Hager James R.
Henrickson Jens M.
Jordan Lavell
Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Gregory Bernarr E.
Honeywell International , Inc.
Luxton, Esq. Matthew
LandOfFree
Methods and apparatus for accurate phase detection does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Methods and apparatus for accurate phase detection, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Methods and apparatus for accurate phase detection will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3224473