Drug – bio-affecting and body treating compositions – Dentifrices
Reexamination Certificate
2003-06-06
2004-04-27
Henley, III, Raymond J. (Department: 1614)
Drug, bio-affecting and body treating compositions
Dentifrices
C424S401000, C424S489000, C424S490000, C514S006900, C514S424000, C514S472000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06726898
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to compositions and methods of treating periodontal disease and related disorders utilizing a sustained, controlled release targeted delivery method to effectively disrupt and inhibit bacterial biofilms at periodontal treatment sites.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Periodontal diseases are a major affliction to mankind. Gingivitis, inflammation of gingival (gum) tissue, and periodontitis, inflammation and progressive loss of ligament and alveolar (socket) bone support to teeth, are caused by bacteria which colonize tooth surfaces and occupy the gingival crevice area. These are major periodontal disease afflictions worldwide. Bacterial plaque is the principal causative agent of these periodontal diseases.
Routine daily prevention or removal of plaque by the patient is a cornerstone of periodontal therapy. Toothbrushes, dental floss and various other oral hygiene instruments can be used. These devices require motor skill and dexterity. The daily routines for adequate plaque removal require the patient to be diligent, motivated, educated and skillful. Accordingly, such methods are effective only when used by motivated individuals and then often to a limited extent.
Optimal response of the immune system to defend against bacterial assault is often not realized in patients prone to periodontal disease and the immune response may actually contribute to the disease process.
Conventional periodontal therapy has emphasized mechanical removal of soft and hard accretions of bacteria (i.e., plaque and calculus) from the root surface via use of dental instruments placed into the gingival crevice to mechanically shear the accretions from the tooth structure. See S. Kakehashi and P. F. Parakkal,
Proceedings from the State of Art Workshop on Surgical Therapy for Periodontitis
, J. Periodontal 53:475 (1982). However, scaling and root planning is often only partially effective in the removal of these accretions. Moreover, the removal is transient and the bacteria re-colonize the root surface.
Adjunctive therapies have been suggested for the treatment of periodontal diseases. Systemic antibiotics have been used in the periodontal therapy. See R. J. Genco,
Antibiotics in the Treatment of Human Periodontal Diseases
, J. Periodontal 52:545 (1981). However, systemic delivery (e.g., oral or intramuscular) typically does not provide a sufficient concentration of antibiotic over an extended period of time to the gingival crevice area.
Applicant's U.S. Pat. No. 4,685,883 deals with controlled sustained release of chemotherapeutic agents in a bioerodable matrix in the periodontal pocket lesion via placement of the matrix in the periodontal pocket lesion with dental instruments. In one embodiment, the chemotherapeutic agents are incorporated into microspheres. These agents, although in sufficient concentration in the gingival crevice or periodontal pocket lesion, may not be able to adequately penetrate into the mass of the residual bacterial accretions on the tooth surfaces. Moreover, the bacterial accretions can rapidly reform.
Although specific bacteria are essential agents for many periodontal disease, their presence alone on the tooth surface and underneath the gingiva is not sufficient to explain the periodontal disease process. Rather, the host must react to this bacterial challenge if disease is to develop and progress. As with other bacterial infections, the host's immune system acts locally at the invasion site and attempts rapidly to neutralize, remove, or destroy the bacterial agents. In periodontal disease, however, chronic bacterial plaque accumulation causes an excessive and persistent antigenic stimulus. Therefore, the host response, rather than being protective and self-limiting, can be destructive. See R. C. Page,
Periodontal Disease, p.
221, Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, 1989.
Applicant's U.S. Pat. No. 5,939,047 deals with a controlled release topical delivery system to facilitate absorption and deposition of host immune system modulating agents into the gingival and oral mucosal tissues adjacent to the periodontium to dampen deleterious effects of host cell immune response to the periodontal bacteria challenge. If the bacterial challenge remains persistent, however, the host immune response can remain excessive and persistent.
Recent attention has been given to removing unwanted biofilms forming in various industrial processes. Biofilms are notoriously resistant to removal. The tendency of bacteria to adhere, secrete an adhesive extracellular matrix and grow is a strong evolutionary advantage difficult to overcome. So far, little success has been realized. Observation of living bacterial biofilms by modern methods has established that these microbial populations form a very complicated structural architecture. See, e.g., J.W. Costerton, et al.,
Microbial biofilms
, Annu. Rev. Microbial, 49:711 (1995). This suggested the operation of a cell—cell signaling mechanism for bacteria to produce these complex structures. After twenty years of research, it is generally assumed now that all enteric bacteria and gram negative bacteria are capable of cell density regulation using acylated homoserine lactones (AHLs) as autoinducer molecules.
In early stages a biofilm is comprised of a cell layer attached to a surface. The cells grow and divide, forming a dense mat numerous layers thick. When sufficient numbers of bacteria are present (quorum) they signal each other to reorganize forming an array of pillars and irregular surface structures, all connected by convoluted channels that deliver food and remove waste. The biofilm produces a glycocalyx matrix shielding them from the environment. Urinary tract and urinary catheter infections are examples of biofilm infections.
As the biofilm matures, the bacteria become greatly more resistant to antibiotics than when in the planktonic (free cell) state. See H. Anwar, et al,
Establishment of aging biofilms: a possible mechanism of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial therapy
, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 36:1347 (1992). The host immune system is also significantly less effective against bacteria in the biofilm state. See E. T. Jensen, et al,
Human polymorphonuclear leukocyte response to Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms
, Infect Immun 5:2383 (1990). Certain bacterial strains may be able to confer resistance protecting the biofilm from host defense components that would otherwise bind to the surface of viable bacteria and kill them. See D. Grenier and M. Belanger,
Protective effect of Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles against bactericidal activity of human serum
, Infect Immun 59:3004 (1991). Yet the bacterial biofilm exudes lipopolysaccharide agitating the host inflammatory response which, in periodontitis, contributes to the tissue destruction.
For Gram-negative bacteria, the signal components in quorum sensing are autoinducers, acylated homoserine lactones (AHLs). These highly membrane-permeable compounds diffuse out of and into the cells and accumulate in localized environments, as the growing population of bacteria increases. At a threshold concentration the autoinducers trigger gene transcription in the localized population of bacteria, activating biochemical pathways and physiological functions appropriate for growth and survival of the bacteria in that environment. Agents which can inhibit AHLs would be beneficial in biofilm disruption or inhibition. See, e.g., S. Srinivasan, et al,
Extracellular signal molecule
(
s
)
involved in the carbon starvation response of marine vibrio sp. strain S
14, J. Bacteriol 180:201 (1998).
Production of another novel signaling molecule is also regulated by changes in environmental conditions associated with a shift from a free-living existence to a colonizing or pathogenic existence in a host organism. This signal molecule is termed autoinducer-2. See, e.g., B. L. Bassler et al., U.S. Patent Application No. 20020107364.
Targeting specific bacteria for inhibition or exclusion from biofilm colonization would be beneficial
Henley III Raymond J.
Merchant & Gould P.C.
LandOfFree
Local delivery of agents for disruption and inhibition of... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Local delivery of agents for disruption and inhibition of..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Local delivery of agents for disruption and inhibition of... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3216915