Liquid purification or separation – Processes – Separating
Reexamination Certificate
2001-11-08
2004-05-04
Reifsnyder, David A. (Department: 1723)
Liquid purification or separation
Processes
Separating
C210S787000, C210S788000, C210S800000, C210S304000, C137S625300, C137S810000, C137S813000, C166S091100, C166S265000, C166S267000, C166S369000, C166S373000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06730236
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to flow control apparatus and to systems and methods employing the same which are used to separate fluids of differing densities, and more particularly, to equipment used to separate gases and liquids during the production and refining of hydrocarbons such as natural gas and oil.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Many fluid flow systems require the separation of fluids having components of differing densities. A prime example is in the production and refining of hydrocarbon liquids and gases. These production fluids often include natural gas, carbon dioxide, oil, water, nitrogen, hydrogen sulfide, and helium along with other fluid and solid contaminants. At some point, it is necessary to separate gases from liquids and water from oil in order to measure, transport, or process the hydrocarbon fluids. A significant shortcoming to most pipeline transport and separation systems is that they employ flow control apparatus which tend to shear and disperse coalesced droplets and stratified layers of fluid components when a fluid mixture passes through the flow control apparatus. This adversely affects the ability of a cooperating downstream separation apparatus to separate fluids of differing densities.
Initially, production fluids are withdrawn from wells drilled in the earth. The production fluids are typically transported to a gas separator where free gas is removed. The liquid then passes to an oil/water separator where most of the water is removed. Examples of conventional gas separators include horizontal and vertical gravity separators and gas/liquid cylindrical cyclones. Examples of conventional liquid separators include horizontal gravity separators, free water knock-outs, liquid/liquid hydrocyclones, and flotation devices.
Various flow control apparatus are used in these gas and liquid separation systems to control the flow of the production fluids. For example, production fluids may be produced from wells at very high pressures. Downstream processing equipment is generally not built robust enough to handle these high pressures in order that the processing equipment may be built economically. Consequently, pressure reducing chokes must be incorporated into the system between the well and downstream processing equipment. Control valves, check valves and other control apparatus are also used to control the flow rate of the production fluids from a well. Other examples of flow control apparatus include homogenizers, mixers, pumps, elbows, venturis, orifice plates, etc. Similarly, the processing of hydrocarbons in refineries often employs many of these same flow control apparatus.
There is a natural tendency for gravity to separate fluid components of differing densities and to concentrate fluids of similar densities, if the fluid flow is sufficiently quiet and given adequate residence time. Further, there is a tendency for droplets in a dispersed phase to coalesce given close enough proximity and adequate contact time for film drainage to remove the fluid barrier between droplets. Separation equipment which is employed to separate fluids of differing densities, such as water and oil, generally operate much more effectively if dispersed droplets in the incoming fluids are large, able to coalesce, stratify and pre-separate prior to entering the separation equipment.
However, the use of conventional flow control apparatus in these separation systems tends to shear and disperse droplets and destratify layers of separated components. Mechanically, this occurs because these flow control apparatus are typically designed such that there is a rapid change in both the flow rate and direction of a fluid mixture passing through the flow control apparatus with energy being dissipated into the fluid. As the rate of energy dissipation per unit volume is increased, smaller droplets are generally created. The shear forces induced during passage through these conventional flow control apparatus tend to tear apart and disperse any stratified layers of fluid which have formed and also disperse large clumps or droplets of one fluid component into another. Likewise, in severe situations, coalesced droplets of oil and water may also be broken up into tiny or microscopic droplets and dispersed under the shear stresses imparted by their passage through these flow control apparatus. Consequently, fluid passage through conventional flow control apparatus often results in the breakup and dispersion of separated layers and coalesced droplets and even in the formation of emulsions. According to Stokes Law, the velocity of a droplet of one fluid falling or rising through another is proportional to the droplet size. Thus, the use of these conventional flow control apparatus in separation systems may be counterproductive to the end goal of producing separated fluids.
Another drawback to conventional flow conditioning equipment is that they are highly susceptible to erosion and wear. Particles, such as sand, which impact components at high velocities and generally perpendicular to a surface, can cause significant wear on the equipment. It would be desirable to extend the life of such equipment by reducing this erosion and wear.
As a specific example, conventional chokes, used to provide pressure letdown, are notorious for breaking up droplets, increasing phase dispersion, worsening emulsions, and eroding in the presence of sand. The extent to which a choke can worsen fluid separation is difficult to predict in advance. Therefore, separation apparatus are often grossly oversized to compensate for the uncertainty of the dispersion effect of the choke or, worse, undersized if the effect of the choke is not adequately accounted for. If dispersion of coalesced droplets is sufficiently severe, chemicals such as deemulsifiers may have to be added to the water and oil mixture to assist in the separation process. Further, in some instances, heat may have to be added to enhance separation. Moreover, these separation apparatus may be mounted in remote areas such as on the sea floor or on an offshore platform where size and weight are important. Consequently, it is desirable to keep separation apparatus as small and light in weight as possible while still achieving a desired level of separation.
Accordingly, there is a need for flow control apparatus which work in cooperation with downstream separation apparatus to minimize the shearing or breaking up of oil layers and droplets in an oil and water mixture during hydrocarbon production and processing. Similarly, other industries, which use flow control apparatus like those described above to separate components in a fluid mixture, also face comparable problems. The present invention reduces the aforementioned shortcomings of many of these separation systems employing conventional flow control apparatus, and in particular, in those systems used in the processing of hydrocarbons.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention includes a mechanical flow conditioning technology for the purpose of improving downstream separation of oil, water and gas. The technology involved is based on the concepts of reducing the forces that break up droplets, and swirling the bulk flow to enhance coalescence of the dispersed phase. Centrifugal forces in the swirling flow field segregate fluid components according to density and cause droplets to crowd together allowing coalescence of multiple droplets into larger droplets. According to Stokes law, droplets with larger diameters will move through a continuous fluid faster and will consequently separate more quickly. Incorporating this technology can result in improved performance from existing separators or allow the use of smaller separators to perform the same duty. Such minimization of separator size is quite desirable when a separator is used in offshore or sea floor separation settings where size and weight reduction are at a premium.
A “coalescing or flow conditioning choke” design is disclosed which produces a pressure drop through a combination of series and parallel swirl producing
Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Reifsnyder David A.
Schulte Richard J.
LandOfFree
Method for separating liquids in a separation system having... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method for separating liquids in a separation system having..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for separating liquids in a separation system having... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3191917