Surgery – Specula – Retractor
Reexamination Certificate
2001-09-14
2003-12-16
O'Connor, Cary E. (Department: 3732)
Surgery
Specula
Retractor
C600S213000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06663562
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to surgical retractors, and more particularly pertains to a new and improved surgical retractor of the bone retracting type.
In commencing a surgical procedure, an orthopaedic surgeon makes one or more incisions in a human body. In order to obtain unhindered access to underlying long bones, the surgeon then uses a retractor to dilate or reflect the skin and underlying layers of tissue. The purpose of retractors is to protect soft tissue around a bone and to allow visualization of a wound including the bone. A typical retractor is formed from surgical steel and includes one or more smooth projections, generally termed “blades,” which retain an area of tissue adjacent to an incision. The retracting blades can be designed with a blunt or pointed distal projection which engage and pivot around a long bone, thus dilating skin and tissue thereby providing access to the bone. A simple retractor may include only a blade attached to a handle. A blade may vary in length and width, and the surface of a blade may be described as being either closed-end (solid) or open-end (open within the periphery). A blade may be straight or curved.
Use of a conventional retractor requires the surgeon to use one hand to operate the retractor, leaving only the other hand to perform functions such as positioning additional retractor blades, otherwise improving exposure, or surgical operations. Frequently a surgical assistant is required to manipulate the retractors to maintain adequate exposure while the surgeon performs the bone work.
Members of the surgical staff who use a hand-held retractor during procedures in which the duration of the case is relatively long and the forces exerted by the tissue upon the retractor are relatively large, may suffer from fatigue and be subject to injury resulting from the necessity of constantly applying pressure to maintain tissue retraction. It is therefore desirable to provide a tissue retractor that allows controlled retraction against relatively high resistance of tissue during lengthy surgical sessions.
Members of the surgical staff who will be using a conventional bone retractor are also subjected to the risks of injury from sharp instruments passed between the incision and the back table. Violation of the sterile field as such exposes the assistant to potential blood-borne infection and exposes the patient to blood-borne, bacterial and fungal infections.
Additionally, different surgical approaches or bone exposures demand distinct visualizations depending on variables such as wound depth, wound length, soft tissue tension, long bone size, and surgical illumination. It is therefore desirable to facilitate use of retractor blades of differing dimensions to accommodate the specific procedure contemplated.
It is important that a retractor efficiently transmit force exerted by the user's hand to the blades. Limitations on conventional hand-held dilating retractors lead many surgeons to reject their use during certain procedures.
Several salutary efforts have been made to provide improved tissue retractors. U.S. Pat. No. 5,931,777 to Sava, for example, discloses a tissue retractor for particular application to spinal surgery comprising a pair of pivotally linked arms, each having a retractor blade mounted thereto via a ball and socket joint. The ball and socket joint allows freedom of movement relative to the arms within the limits of the ball joint. The balls and sockets of each joint are detachable from each other for cleaning and sterilization. Pilot holes are drilled in bone at a distance defining a surgical field. Piercing tips at the base of each blade are inserted into the pilot holes, anchoring the blades in place. A supplemental retractor blade or blades may be provided using a U-shaped linking structure for additional retraction perpendicular to the retraction provided by the main retractor blades. One disadvantage of the Sava device is that the arms may expand only within the limits of the ball joint, expansion beyond which may cause the ball to pop out of the socket. The possible degree of exposure is therefore limited. A second disadvantage is that the piercing tips on the retractor blades are inappropriate for long bone surgery. Third, although the blades are detachable, the ball and socket joint is not ideal for convenient exchange of a selection of modular blades appropriate for different requirements Fourth, the drilling of pilot holes in bone is undesirable because it is time consuming and creates stress risers in bone which can predispose the bone to fracture. Thus, the Sava retractor is of limited efficiency, may experience metal fatigue at the locus of the expansion joint, and may fail at its limits of expansion.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,747,395 to Brief discloses a surgical retractor for large bone surgery, particularly femur surgery, comprising a pair of retractor members each having an upper lever arm section. The upper lever arm sections receive a U-shaped expander for expanding and locking in place the upper sections of the lever arms. The utility of the Brief retractor is limited because two or more hands are required to manipulate it. Another disadvantage is that movement of the retractor blades is restricted to one plane, which may result in alignment problems. Further, the configuration of the blades is not conducive to modular blade selection and its large size does not allow its use in surgery involving smaller bones.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,728,046 to Mayer discloses a surgical retractor having a frame on which at least two retractor elements are mounted. The frame is rigidly mounted to a bone with at least one support foot, thus allowing retractor blades to be positioned on individual tissue parts bearing different pressing forces. The Mayer device is complicated and must be screw-anchored in bone. The device's configuration and retractor blades are not suited to long bone surgery. Mayer also requires both hands to operate. As with Sava, above, the device penetrates bone in order to work properly, compromising the healing process, and predisposing the bone to fracture.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An improved surgical retractor for use in long-bone surgery comprises a pair of arms and a retractor blade connected to each arm by a detachable, rotating knee joint which facilitates adjustment and alignment of the blade in dual planes of movement. In particular, each arm has a handle and a distal portion. The arms have a common pivotal connection disposed between the handle and distal portions of each arm. Since each arm is angled outwardly from the pivotal connection, closing the handles causes the arms to mutually recede.
Immediately adjacent the handles, a curved locking ratchet mechanism and thumb-operated pawl control the distance of separation of the arms and allow them to be locked at any selected degree of separation.
A knee joint having a detent locking mechanism is used to affix a long-bone retractor blade to the distal portion of each arm. The detent locking mechanism allows any selected pair of retractor blades to be attached to the arms. Once mounted to the arm, each retractor blade is rotatable about an axis parallel to the arm and also about an axis perpendicular to the arm. These plural aspects of rotation allow the surgeon substantial freedom in positioning the blades and the handles once the blades are in their retracted positions.
The invention uses bone retractor blades of the type having a remote, curved, long bone-engaging tongue. Using long bone retractor blades eliminates the need for a piercing tip in the blade and for drilling a pilot hole in the bone to anchor the retractor. When each of the two retractor blades is placed in position on a long bone, closing the handles causes the retractor blades to recede from each other, pivoting around the bone, and opening the angle of the wound, effectively retracting surrounding tissue from the bone.
A distinct advantage of using the improved retractor is that a surgeon need use only one hand to position and open the retractor, freei
Beverly Brian
O'Connor Cary E.
LandOfFree
Surgical retractor does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Surgical retractor, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Surgical retractor will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3135094