Ammunition and explosives – Shells – Shrapnel
Reexamination Certificate
2002-01-07
2003-09-09
Tudor, Harold J. (Department: 3641)
Ammunition and explosives
Shells
Shrapnel
C102S473000, C102S492000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06615738
ABSTRACT:
The present invention falls within the military domain, more specifically the domain of fragmentation explosive munitions, such as, in particular, bombs, with controlled or uncontrolled fragmentation, intended for example for anti-runway, anti-bunker or anti-vehicle (ship, tank, armoured vehicle, etc.) operations.
Fragmentation explosive munitions generally comprise a metal casing, prefragmented or otherwise, containing an explosive charge.
When the charge is detonated, the casing breaks, forming fragments whose destructive effects are desired. The higher the level of velocity of the fragments, the more intense these effects are.
It is well known for this velocity to be increased by using more powerful explosives, but these prove to be more expensive and more sensitive and therefore more dangerous to handle and to store.
The person skilled in the art therefore is on the constant look-out, in order to improve the effectiveness of fragmentation explosive munitions, particularly bombs, for a given explosive charge, for new designs, particularly architectures, that will make it possible to increase the velocity of the fragments obtained.
The present invention proposes such a solution.
Its subject is a novel fragmentation explosive munition element which comprises:
a casing, preferably metallic, capable of generating fragments, having an axis of revolution,
an explosive charge contained in the said casing and covered by it, that is to say surrounded by the said casing, having the same axis of revolution as the casing, and comprising a hole in the form of a cylindrical canal, the generatrices of which are parallel to the axis of revolution of the explosive charge,
a single means of initiating the said explosive charge.
This novel munition element according to the invention is characterized in that the single initiating means is a peripheral and punctual initiating means, that is to say one located at a single point on the surface of revolution of the explosive charge.
A “single” initiating means is normally to be understood as meaning that the explosive charge has no other means of initiation.
A “surface of revolution” is to be understood conventionally as meaning a surface generated by rotating a curve (generatrix) about a fixed straight line (axis of revolution).
The “generatrices” of the cylindrical canal are to be understood conventionally as meaning the collection of parallel straight lines sitting on a closed plane curve (directrix) defining a cylinder.
This new design according to the invention is not to be interpreted in its strictest mathematical sense. The canal may in particular simply be cylindroid, and the generatrices may simply be approximately parallel to the axis of revolution of the charge, which itself may not be strictly of revolution.
Various ways of initiating fragmentation explosive munitions are described in the prior art.
Patent FR 2 778 978 describes, for example, a fragmentation artillery round comprising an explosive charge contained in a casing. Initiation of the charge is either centrally in the explosive charge, or on the bottom side.
Patent FR 2 748 102 describes a fragmentation munition the explosive charge of which comprises a cylindrical central canal in which the means of initiating the charge is housed.
Patent GB 2 318 631 describes an explosive munition cylindrical element consisting essentially, on the one hand, of a hollow annular steel wall in which an explosive charge is embedded and, on the other hand, a multi-point system for initiating the explosive charge.
Patent FR 2 679 640 describes multi-point initiation apparatus intended to constitute a detonation-wave shaper for shaped or fragmentation charges.
The explosive charge has no hole in the form of a cylindrical canal.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,579,059 describes a tubular fragmentation projectile, the (hollow) wall of which delimits an annular chamber containing an explosive charge which is thus completely embedded in the tube.
Furthermore, the means of initiating the charge lies at a side face of this charge rather than at its periphery.
The abovementioned design according to the invention is therefore not known to those skilled in the art. Unexpectedly and in a particularly simple and inexpensive way, it makes it possible to increase considerably, for a given explosive charge, the velocity of the fragments obtained, without increasing the pyrotechnic risks associated with handling and storage.
According to a particularly preferred alternative form of the invention, the casing revolution capable of generating fragments and the explosive charge of revolution that it surrounds have a cylindrical or ogival shape. As example of other shapes of revolution, mention may be made of conical and frustoconical shapes.
According to the invention, the term “punctual” or “point” is not to be interpreted in the strictest mathematical sense. In practice, this term means a small area likenable to a point by comparison with the total area of revolution of the charge. A conventional initiating means comprising a detonator and a cylindrical relay of diameter 10 mm in explosive of the hexowax type in contact with the periphery of a charge of diameter 150 mm and of length 100 mm allows punctual peripheral initiation within the meaning of the present invention.
The firing of a perforating steel ball represents another example of a punctual initiating means according to the invention.
In general, use may be made of any conventional initiation means well known to those skilled in the art, particularly of initiation systems involving an explosive booster or a projected element.
According to the invention, the transition to detonation after initiation may be of the shock-to-detonation transition (SDT) type or of the delayed detonation transition type also known as “unknown”-to-detonation transition (XDT) type). These two mechanisms for transition to detonation are well known to those skilled in the art.
In SDT transition, initiation generates a shockwave whose pressure and sustain time level exceed the detonation threshold of the energetic material which is a characteristic of this material.
In the XDT transition, which lasts far longer, initiation generates a shockwave whose pressure and sustain time level are below the aforementioned SDT operating threshold. This rather unreactive shock physically damages the material, then, having reflected off the wall and combined with another wave, returns as a raised pressure to the damaged material, which causes it to break down chemically and to detonate.
The person skilled in the art knows, by calculation or by experiment, how to choose an initiation means that, for a given explosive charge, makes it possible to obtain a detonation transition of the SDT or XDT type.
According to a particularly preferred alternative form of the invention, the single initiating means is such that it can bring about an XDT transition by generating a shockwave whose pressure and sustain time level are below the detonation threshold of the explosive charge (SDT operation threshold).
Particularly unexpectedly, it has been found that this alternative form makes it possible to increase the velocity of the fragments obtained still further by comparison with the alternative form of initiation with SDT detonation transition.
According to another preferred alternative form of the invention, the hole in the form of a cylindrical canal is situated in the charge in a central position so that the axis of revolution of the explosive charge passes through the hole.
According to another preferred alternative form, the cross section of the cylindrical canal forming the hole is circular, elliptical, square, rectangular, trapezoidal, polygonal or star-shaped.
As a particular preference, the hole is a canal which is cylindrical of revolution, that is to say that its cross section is circular, the axis of which coincides, strictly or approximately, with the axis of revolution of the explosive charge.
The ratio between the cross section of the explosive charge and the cross section of the hole is preferably and in gener
Oliff & Berridg,e PLC
SNPE
Tudor Harold J.
LandOfFree
Fragmentation explosive munition element does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Fragmentation explosive munition element, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Fragmentation explosive munition element will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3105766