Surgery: light – thermal – and electrical application – Light – thermal – and electrical application – Electrical therapeutic systems
Reexamination Certificate
2001-09-14
2003-07-15
Layno, Carl (Department: 3762)
Surgery: light, thermal, and electrical application
Light, thermal, and electrical application
Electrical therapeutic systems
C607S032000, C607S009000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06594523
ABSTRACT:
FILED OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to cardiac pacemakers, and other types of implantable medical devices, which can be programmed and/or analyzed following implantation using an external diagnostic/programmer system. More particularly, the invention relates to an implantable device, diagnostic/programmer, and method wherein software routines automatically evaluate the interaction of the device with a patient's heart.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Implantable cardiac pacemakers commonly store a variety of different types of diagnostic data which assist the physician in evaluating both the operation of the patient's heart and the operation of the implanted device. Depending upon the particular pacemaker and its mode of operation, this information may include, for example, a heart rate histogram (which indicates the distribution of the patient's heart rate over a period of time, such as one month), an event histogram (which indicates the distribution of the various sensing and stimulation events), a sensor indicated rate histogram (which indicates the distribution over time of the recommended pacing rate indicated by an implanted sensor), a variety of event counters, one or more event-triggered intracardiac electrograms, and the status of the pacemaker's battery.
The various items of diagnostic data may be retrieved from the pacemaker for display and evaluation using a pacemaker programmer/diagnostic system (“programmer”), which uses RF telemetry to communicate with the implanted device. This is typically accomplished during routine follow-up visits of the patient to the clinic, during which time the patient is asked to hold a telemetry wand in the locality of the implanted pacemaker. To read out and view a particular item of information (e.g., a heart rate histogram), the physician employs a user interface of the programmer to designate the diagnostic item to be retrieved, and then initiates the retrieval. The programmer in-turn interrogates the pacemaker to cause the pacemaker to transmit the selected diagnostic item, and then receives and displays the selected item on the screen. The physician may also initiate various types of tests using the programmer, such as a ventricular or atrial capture test which determines the minimum output (e.g. pulse voltage) needed to effectively stimulate the respective chamber of the heart. The physician may retrieve and adjust various programmable pacing parameters, such as sensor control parameters that are used to adjust the pacing rate according to the output of an event (or other) sensor which detects a signal other than the electrical activity generated within the cardiac tissue and uses this other signal as a guide to the appropriate heart rate.
During the follow-up visit, it is common for the physician (or other support personnel) to follow a predetermined sequence or “protocol” for the evaluation of the patient. The particular protocol will often vary from physician-to-physician and/or clinic-to-clinic, and may be further modified depending upon the medical condition of the patient. By way of example, a follow-up protocol may include the steps of:
(1) retrieving, viewing and printing the atrial and ventricular and/or heart rate histograms;
(2) retrieving and viewing (and optionally printing) the event histogram;
(3) conducting ventricular and atrial sense tests;
(4) conducting ventricular and atrial capture tests; (5) contingent upon the results of steps 1-4, retrieving and viewing the R-wave and P-wave histograms (indicative of the depolarization of the ventricles and the atria, respectively);
(6) retrieving, viewing and printing the sensor indicated rate histogram; and
(7) if appropriate, adjusting the sensor control parameters. During each step of the protocol, the physician typically interviews the patient and records the patient's comments. At the end of the examination, the physician normally programs the pacemaker to parameters that are appropriate for the patient based on this evaluation (pacemaker prescription) and prepares a written report, which typically includes various printouts of the retrieved diagnostic and test data.
One problem with current diagnostic methods used to evaluate the follow-up patient is that the physician is typically required to scroll through large volumes of data on the programmer screen, even though only selected portions of this data are significant for diagnostic purposes. This is true, for example, in the case of atrial and ventricular capture tests, in which the physician is typically presented with a snap-shot of real-time data (typically, several seconds long), and must scroll through the data to locate the point at which capture was lost. Because much of the data viewed by the physician is not applicable to the final result, the process tends to be inefficient.
Based upon the results of the pacemaker diagnostic evaluation, the physician sometimes alters the pacemaker parameters (i.e., the stored values that specify the therapy delivered by the pacemaker). These modifications to the pacemaker parameters are typically standard given a certain set of results. However, the steps of performing the assessment of capture and sensing thresholds, sensor function and other behavioral characteristics of the pacemaker that may require programming multiple different parameters for each test tend to be time consuming, further adding to the overall time required to complete the follow-up examination. In some cases, because of the relative complexity and the amount of time that is required, these tests are not performed to the potential detriment of the patient.
Many conventional pacemaker diagnostic systems merely provide historical data to the physician and are not capable of providing for real-time analysis of pacemaker capture and sensing thresholds as well as other functional settings. Even those systems which do provide real-time analysis of some diagnostic items often do not allow the clinician or the programmer to modify pacemaker parameters “on the fly” so that the clinician can immediately observe the results of such parameter modification. This can significantly reduce the physician's ability to actively interact with the pacemaker to achieve an unambiguous result.
As a patient's condition may and generally does change over time after receiving an implanted cardiac stimulation device, periodic follow-up testing with the physician is generally performed. These follow-up tests are conducted to evaluate the patient's natural heart rhythm, physiological cardiac event detection thresholds or pacing capture thresholds, for example. The tests are therefore designed to evaluate and reveal the interaction of the implanted cardiac device and the patient's heart.
Currently, follow-up tests are performed manually or semi-automatically with external programmers. To that end, the telemetry system of the devices transmits data, such as electrograms and event markers, to the external programmer. The external programmer then, in turn, receives the data and displays the electrograms and event markers along with a simultaneously recorded surface electrocardiogram (ECG). By changing various programmable parameters, such as pacing rates, detection (sensing) settings, stimulation output, and modality with the programmer, and observing the displayed electrocardiogram in conjunction with the simultaneously telemetered electrograms and event markers, the physician is able to discern the interaction of the device with the patient's heart and make a decision as to whether or not changes in programmed settings are required or the present settings are appropriate for the patient.
Unfortunately, follow-up testing remains both tedious and time consuming for both the patient and the physician. These periodic evaluations may also be performed by physicians without special training in device management, because of a lack of availability of physicians with this expertise. In spite of improvements, there still remains room for human error because the user m
Layno Carl
Pacesetter Inc.
LandOfFree
Implantable stimulation device, programmer, and method for... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Implantable stimulation device, programmer, and method for..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Implantable stimulation device, programmer, and method for... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3060121