Constant compression automatic gain control circuit

Telecommunications – Receiver or analog modulated signal frequency converter – Local control of receiver operation

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C455S234100, C455S234200, C455S253200

Reexamination Certificate

active

06625433

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to circuits for automatic gain control (AGC) of signals in a telecommunications receiver, and, in particular, constant compression of signals generated within an AGC circuit.
2. Description of the Related Art
Radio and intermediate-radio frequency (RF and IF) transmitters and receivers commonly employ gain control with feedback to adjust signal levels of each amplifier stage. Analog and digital automatic gain control (AGC) circuits are well-known in the art. Although applications in which RF/IF transmitters or receivers with AGC circuits are used are too numerous to describe in detail, one increasingly popular application is in the field of cellular, wireless, and spread-spectrum wireless communication systems.
The AGC function may be employed to bring a newly acquired signal at the input to the receiver into the dynamic range of the receiver when a communication link is first established. Thereafter, the AGC function continually adjusts the overall receiver gain to compensate for fluctuations in received signal strength associated with fading, interference, periods of “silence” between data frames, or similar interruptions of the signal level. The “settling” time of an AGC circuit is the time required by the AGC function to bring the received signal to an optimum level within the dynamic range of the RF receiver. The settling time is typically measured from the time the received signal level first experiences a change in level to the time that the received signal reaches the optimum level.
Such gain control circuitry is primarily employed to maintain a constant level at the output of the series chain of analog components that forms the front end of a receiver, including the amplification and RF/IF demodulation stages. The constant level at the output of the series chain is maintained such that the output (demodulated) baseband signal level of the receiver remains within well-defined limits, even though many factors may vary gain levels within each component of the series chain. For example, in a receiver that delivers audio information to a speaker, the output level of the audio desirably remains constant regardless of 1) variation of the signal level input to the receiver, or 2) variations induced within the receiver components themselves by temperature and/or frequency-dependent influences.
One such influence that occurs is “gain flatness” such that the gain of the circuit component changes as a function of the operating frequency. Most notably, filters often exhibit gain or loss variations across the entire operating frequency range. Another influence is the gain variation across devices manufactured in high volume. Moreover, signal gain (or loss) of these components also varies as ambient temperature changes. The total variation of gain or loss due to frequency variations and/or temperature fluctuations becomes quite large, and possibly out of a specified output level tolerance range, if an AGC function is not implemented within the receiver.
In addition to maintaining a constant signal level output from the series chain of components, the AGC function also adjusts the strength of the signal input to each component along the receiver signal path through the chain. The AGC function adjusts the signal level at points along the path through the chain to an “optimum” level that is within the dynamic range of each of the various components. Each component in the receiver chain has an optimum operating range of signal level, which range is bounded on the lower end by its additive noise characteristics and on the upper end by its saturation point. Thus, physical characteristics of realizable components force trade-offs between competing and contrary requirements that are desirably met simultaneously to achieve overall satisfactory receiver performance.
Therefore, a given receiver design may implement the AGC function having three objectives that are desirably met simultaneously. The first objective is to achieve a relatively constant output level for the baseband signal by varying the output signal of one or more components in the series chain as the level of the signal input to the receiver varies. The second objective is to vary the level of the signal as it passes through the series chain so as to 1) be within the optimum operating range of each component, but 2) not be compressed at any one of the components. The third objective is to keep the level of the signal as it passes through the series chain far enough above the noise floor of each component to maintain a specified signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).
Implementation of the AGC function is further complicated by the fact that these 3 objectives must be met in the presence of interference. The total signal power at any point in the signal path and contains varying proportions of the desired signal power and unwanted signal (interference) power. Consequently, relatively simple implementations for an AGC function may mistake an unwanted signal for the wanted, and then either amplify the unwanted signal or attenuate the wanted signal below recognition (i.e., insufficient SNR for a detector of the demodulated baseband signal). Thus, given these three objectives, the AGC function needs to provide an output signal having an acceptable level of overall signal resolution in the presence of signal interference.
A wide variety of AGC systems for RF/IF transceivers are known in the prior art. These AGC systems include both analog and digital designs, and vary considerably according to speed, accuracy, cost, and complexity. The recent growth of standards for wireless and cellular telecommunication systems, and the accompanying growth in the availability of inexpensive microprocessors to process digital signals, have enabled the implementation of digital or digitally controlled AGC systems. Digital AGC implementations have advantages over comparable analog AGC implementations because digital AGC implementations provide powerful and flexible AGC functionality in dynamic signal and interference environments. These benefits are achieved without additional circuitry that may be required by the comparable analog AGC implementations.
Prior art AGC implementations often employ gain control that is distributed throughout the RF and IF demodulation and gain stages of the receiver as individual AGC circuits. An individual AGC circuit commonly employs either a feed-forward or feed-back AGC signal configuration in which each gain stage detects the signal power at either its input (feed-forward signal configuration) or output (feed-back signal configuration). Based on the detected signal power, each individual AGC circuit adjusts input signal level of the gain stage to maintain a constant level at the output of the gain stage. For these individual AGC circuits, each stage includes an autonomously controlled variable gain amplifier that operates independently of other stages. Such configurations may be unstable since compensation of gain in one stage by an amplifier may produce an overcompensation (or other counter-effect) of the signal for subsequent stages.
In addition, traditional AGC circuits with analog variable-gain amplifiers do not allow for a constant compression-point. The compression-point is a measure of an amplifier's (and, hence, amplifier stage's) linearity. A comparison of the compression point to a particular signal level at the output of the amplifier is related to the “headroom” (or linearity margin) that the stage exhibits for that particular signal level. To avoid amplifier saturation, it is desirable to reduce the level of the desired signal by reducing the amplifier's gain while minimizing a corresponding reduction in the compression point of the amplifier stage. However, for most analog-controlled gain stages of the prior art, reducing the desired signal level by a reduction of gain in the amplifier stage generates a corresponding reduction of compression point. Therefore, high input level (i.e., “strong”) signals may require even

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Constant compression automatic gain control circuit does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Constant compression automatic gain control circuit, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Constant compression automatic gain control circuit will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3046665

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.