Process for estimating a parasite phase shift during...

Data processing: generic control systems or specific application – Generic control system – apparatus or process – Optimization or adaptive control

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C700S013000, C700S014000, C700S026000, C700S027000, C700S039000, C700S052000, C375S150000, C375S226000, C375S343000, C375S344000, C375S362000, C375S367000, C329S302000, C329S304000, C329S300000, C370S479000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06529783

ABSTRACT:

The field of the invention relates to the reception of multi-carrier signals. More precisely, the invention relates to estimating the phase shift introduced by demodulation operations.
The invention is applicable to all types of signals using several carrier frequencies, in other words systems using signals transmitted using the Frequency Division Multiplex (FDM) technique, for example the Coded Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplex (COFDM) system, used particularly within the framework of the European Eureka 147 “DAB” (Digital Audio Broadcasting) and RACE dTTb (digital Terrestrial TV broadcasting) projects.
In this type of transmission system, the source data to be transmitted are organized in symbols (composed of one or several source data) each modulating a carrier frequency chosen among several carriers, during a predetermined time interval. The signal formed by the set of modulated carriers is transmitted to one or several receivers that receive an emitted signal disturbed by the transmission channel.
In principle, demodulation usually consists of estimating the response of the transmission channel for each carrier and for each symbol, and then dividing the received signal by this estimate to obtain an estimate of the emitted symbol.
A number of demodulation techniques are known. The demodulation may be differential or coherent. For example, patent FR-94 07984 deposited by the same applicants describes one technique facilitating coherent demodulation using reference symbols (or “pilots”) known in receivers and inserted regularly among the useful symbols.
Therefore, the multi-carrier digital signal considered includes a number of “pilots”, in other words carriers modulated by known values of the receiver. Let C be the set of indices of these carriers. If K belongs to C, the complex value modulating carrier number k for the duration of symbol number n is denoted P
n,k
. Note that this value is known to the receiver.
In reception, the value observed on the n
th
symbol of carrier number k is denoted R
n,k
. Typically:
R
n,k
=P
n,k
H
n,k
e
j&phgr;
n
(+noise)  (1)
where H
n,k
is the complex frequency response of the channel at the frequency of carrier number k;
&phgr;
n
is a phase introduced by the demodulation that is to be estimated (&phgr;
n
is common to all carriers).
H
n,k
varies slowly with time (H
n,k
is not very different from H
n+1,k
), whereas &phgr;
n
can vary considerably from one symbol to the next if the local oscillator in the receiver is badly adjusted. Therefore, estimating &phgr;
n
is useful to determine the frequency error of the local oscillator so that it can be corrected afterwards (Automatic Frequency Control AFC).
Furthermore, as described in the documents in French patents FR-95 10067 and FR-95 10068 deposited by the applicants who also deposited this patent application, knowledge of &phgr;
n
is useful to reduce the bias introduced by white frequency distortion, and take account of an estimate of this type of white distortion for demodulation.
In practice, only the variations of &phgr;
n
need to be estimated: the value of &phgr;
o
fixed by definition may be incorporated into the response of channel H
n,k
. Since H
n,k
is not very different from H
n+1,k
, (&phgr;
n
−&phgr;
n−1
), denoted &dgr;
n
, is conventionally estimated from R
n,k
using the following formula:
δ
n
=
Arg

{

k

C

[
(
R
n
,
k
·
P
n
,
k
*
)



(
R
n
-
1
,
k
·
P
n
-
1
,
k
*
)


*
]
}
(
2
)
This known approach is explained as follows. The modulus of the square of H
n,k
will be denoted A
n,k
, and the modulus of the square of P
n,k
will be denoted Q
n,k
. According to equation (1), R
n−1,k
P*
n,k
gives an estimate of Q
n,k
H
n,k
e
j&phgr;n−1
. Similarly, R
n,k
P*
n−1,k
gives an estimate of Q
n−1,k
H
n−1,k
ej&phgr;n−1
. Finally, since H
n,k
is not very different from H
n−1,k
, H
n,k
H*
n−1,k
is close to A
n,k
. Therefore
δ
n
=
Arg

{

k

C

[
Q
n
,
k

Q
n
-
1
,
k

A
n
,
k


j

(
φ
n
-
φ
n
-
1
)
]
}
It is useful to weight the terms in the sum by Q
n,k
.Q
n−1,k
.A
n,k
since it reflects the reliability of each term (the phase is more reliable for larger magnitudes). Therefore, this type of estimate is particularly suitable for channels with selective frequency, for which A
n,k
varies strongly with k.
Finally, the phase &dgr;
n
of the sum gives an estimate of (&phgr;
n
−&phgr;
n−1
) for which the reliability increases with the number of carriers of C.
In practice, values of P
n,k
usually have the same modulus Q. P
n,k
may be completely independent of n (continuous carriers); in this case, the sum (2) may be simplified since P*
n,k
P
n−1,k
is always equal to Q, as follows:
δ
n
=
Arg

{

k

C

[
R
n
,
k
·
R
n
-
1
,
k
·
P
n
-
1
,
k
*
]
}
(2a)
In the following, the form of equation (2) will be maintained in order to remain general, but the form (2a) is obviously preferable in the case of continuous carriers.
In some cases, an attempt is made to estimate (&phgr;
n
−&phgr;
n−t
), where t>1, rather than (&phgr;
n
−&phgr;
n−1
); obviously, the method remains the same. All that is necessary is to replace subscript n−1 by n−t.
The inventors have observed that although this conventional technique may be efficient under transmission conditions in which there is not much interference, it is poor in some conditions in the presence of interference sources. In this case, some carriers are continuously polluted by very strong noise, sometimes much stronger than the useful signal. The result of this is some completely distorted terms, usually with a strong amplitude, in sum (2). Since &dgr;
n
is fairly small, particularly when the local oscillator tends towards the right frequency), these few terms can completely disturb the result of the sum.
One particular purpose of this invention is to overcome this disadvantage with the state-of-the-art.
More precisely, one purpose of the invention is to provide a technique for strongly attenuating the effect of interference sources on the estimate of the phase shift induced by the receiver.
In other words, the purpose of the invention is to provide a process and a corresponding receiver that optimizes the estimate of the phase shift, particularly when the phase shift is small.
Another purpose of the invention is to supply a corresponding technique that is simple to use and that does not require complex calculations or specific means in the receivers.
Another purpose of the invention is to provide a similar technique that does not require any modification to the signal to be emitted, and which is therefore compatible with transmission techniques already used.
These purposes, and others that will become clear in the following description, are achieved according to the invention using a process for estimating a parasite phase shift on reception of a multi-carrier signal formed by a time sequence of symbols modulating a plurality of carrier frequencies, at least some of the said carrier frequencies for at least some of the said symbols carrying reference elements, for which the values on transmission are known to the receiver that receives them, this process being of the type comprising a step in which the phase variation &dgr;
n
between at least two symbols carrying the reference elements is estimated, in which the contribution of at least some of the said reference elements in the said estimate is weighted by information representative of the noise affecting the carrier frequency carrying the said reference element.
Thus, the importance assigned to each pilot depends on the disturbances that affect it, and therefore its credibility. It should be noted that this new approach is not obvious, but is based particularly on the formulation of the problem described above, that has never been made or envisaged before.
Note t

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Process for estimating a parasite phase shift during... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Process for estimating a parasite phase shift during..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Process for estimating a parasite phase shift during... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3013320

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.