Games using tangible projectile – Golf – Club or club support
Reexamination Certificate
2000-08-09
2003-05-27
Blau, Stephen (Department: 3711)
Games using tangible projectile
Golf
Club or club support
C473S314000, C473S340000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06569032
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to putter heads which are typically attached to a shaft and used in a variety of games to propel a hard ball over a course or links. Reference will be made hereinafter to the game of golf but it should be understood that the invention is not restricted to such and has applications in other sports such as croquet or pitch-and-putt.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The putting green is an area of a golf course typically comprising closely cropped grass surrounding a hole. Using a golf club known as a putter, the ball is given a gentle stroke known as a putt and the smooth surface of the putting green is designed to facilitate progress of the hall into a hole. Putting is often purported to be the most difficult aspect of the game and the stroke requiring the greatest degree of skill.
Generally at least two putts are required by competent players in order to hole a golf ball. It will be appreciated that those less skilled in the art of golf may require many more shots in order to hole the ball.
Many advanced and professional golfers possess numerous putters in their collection. This implies that individual requirements change and this is influenced in part by experience, age and physical abilities.
The advantages of a golf putter wherein the center of gravity is to the rear of the putter head are well known in the art. Such a design enhances performance of the golfer enabling him to strike the ball with an improved “pendulum swing.” Due to the specific weight distribution, the putter lends itself to be swung in a manner which resembles a pendulum which is found to be the most effective stroke with which to hit the ball, allowing for a cleaner strike. The player gets the ball rolling sooner which is an essential feature for better putting.
In the light of these design constraints attention has focused on weight distribution within the putter head with respect to the specific materials employed in manufacture. A known putter incorporates an insert of plastics material into a trough shaped putter head which is typically made of metal such as brass, steel, aluminum or some other relatively rigid material. Since the plastic insert is six to seven times lighter than any metal, the centre of gravity is automatically re-positioned towards the lower back of the putter head.
Another benefit of using a plastic insert on the face of the putter is that it re-creates the soft feeling of the old balata-type golf balls which have now been replaced by durable hard balls.
Upon swinging the putter, the player supplies kinetic energy which is transferred into forward rotational movement of a golf ball resting on a playing surface so as to elicit a predictable line of travel. This process is dependent on transferring the kinetic energy at exactly the correct spot, hereinafter referred to as the ‘sweet spot’, from the putter head to the golf ball.
The disadvantage of the above mentioned known putter is that this design creates a ‘sweet spot’ which is within the plastic insert and which is comparatively small relative to the total area of the putter. In order to strike the ball most effectively the golfer must target the ball with this specific spot. Understandably this goal is very difficult to attain, especially for the novice.
Another disadvantage of the above mentioned putter is in their production which is expensive, complicated and time-consuming. The first step is the production of a ‘cavity’ on the face of the putter. This cavity can be made during the moulding process of the metal but a final ‘routing’ is necessary for precise results. The second step involves pouring liquid plastic polymer into the cavity in either a ‘hot’ or ‘cold’ stage. During this process air bubbles often get trapped in the insert. These air bubbles are made apparent during the final face-milling process and result in a defective putter. The third step of production involves overnight storage of the product to allow it to reach a stable state before the final face milling operation.
STATEMENT OF THE INVENTION
According to the present invention there is provided a putter head suitable for attachment to a shaft comprising a back portion and a front portion, said front portion being of substantially lower density material than said back portion, said front portion superimposing said back portion and defining substantially the entire striking face of the putter.
The advantage of a putter of the present invention is that it avoids the inherent problem of the known putter whereby upon failing to target the ball with the sweet spot defined by the plastic insert, the golfer strikes the ball with a mixture of metal and plastics. In this way the material striking the ball and subsequently the force supplied to the ball is not uniform and it travels forward in the direction according to which the greatest force is supplied. This will inevitably lead to large distance variations between subsequent shots.
In a putter of the present invention the front portion covers the back portion which is not exposed at any part of the striking face. Even if the golfer misses the sweet spot, the design of the putter is such that it offers a striking surface which is uniform with respect to the type of material contacting the ball. Accordingly, a putter of the present invention allows for more predictable forward motion of the ball whereby striking the ball other than at the sweet spot may cause the player to miss the hole but shots will be in the same range.
A golf putter of the present invention also offers significant benefits in terms of production because the back and front portions of the putter are made separately and then simply joined together using standard techniques. Production is fast, economical and results in a minimal number of defective products. The sophisticated production techniques of plastic inserted putters are altogether avoided.
Preferably the back portion of the putter is made of metal and the front portion is made of hard plastics material. Most preferably the front portion is made of a polymer of any one of or a combination of melamine-formaldehyde, phenol formaldehyde, polyester, acrylic, polyurethane or epoxy type materials. Preferably the polymer is high pressure laminate.
If a melamine-formaldehyde or phenol formaldehyde polymer is used (both resin based), cellulose is employed as the filling material. This gives body to the polymer. Alternatively, if a polyester or acrylic polymer is used, the filling material is usually Aluminum Trihydrate Al(OH)
3
. In the case of an epoxy or polyurethane polymer, each can be used independently in a 100% resin formulation, or each can be incorporated into formulations with mineral fillers like CaCO
3
, talc or dolomite. Mixing the product with calcite minerals allows for the production of a material with different strength characteristics.
The thickness of the front portion can vary from 5 mm to 15 mm but is preferably from 6 mm to 12 mm. Most preferably the thickness of the front portion is 10 mm.
A putter of the present invention also offers significant benefits in terms of weight redistribution in the putter head. In a known putter with a plastic insert, 10%-20% of the putter head volume is replaced by plastic materials. This is not sufficient to move the center of gravity as far back as desired. By way of compensation, manufacturers use heavy metal inserts, such as tungsten, at the back of the putter head. This measure adds further complications to the production process and greatly increases production costs.
In a putter of the present invention 45% to 55% of the head volume is made of plastic which corresponds to 15% to 19% of the total weight. Preferably 50% of the head volume is made of plastic which corresponds to 17% of the total weight. Weight is canalised to the rear of the putter head, thus targeting the center of gravity into the required position at the back and lower points as desired. In order to achieve these results the putter does not have to be heavier than 300 g. This is an advantage because heavy putters cause problem
Blau Stephen
Schindler Edwin D.
LandOfFree
Golf putter does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Golf putter, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Golf putter will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3002304