Telecommunications – Radiotelephone system – Zoned or cellular telephone system
Reexamination Certificate
1999-05-07
2002-12-31
Cumming, William (Department: 2684)
Telecommunications
Radiotelephone system
Zoned or cellular telephone system
C455S422100, C455S426100, C455S435100, C455S451000, C455S454000, C455S455000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06501951
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to a method for controlling control channel re-selection by a mobile communication station. More particularly, the invention relates to allowing the re-selection process to be conducted only with respect to those candidate control channels, onto which the mobile station is eligible to camp.
In the wireless communication environment it is known that as a mobile station moves throughout an area it is likely to encounter different cells that are serviced by different base stations. One example of a multi-cell wireless environment is illustrated in FIG.
1
. There are a plurality of cells (C
1
to C
12
) and each is served by a separate base station (BS
1
to BS
12
). As a mobile station moves from one cell to another cell it is served by a different base station.
Typically the base stations operate with distinct control channels, voice channels or data channels. It is known that during a communication, such as a call, as a mobile station passes from one cell to another it is handed off from one base station to another according to a certain protocol. However, in an activated state where a call is not in process, while the mobile station is in a cell, it is camped on a control channel, i.e., it is in essence tuned to that channel and prepared to engage in communications of control information over that channel. The mobile station must execute a process for selecting another control channel as the mobile station moves from cell to cell. This is called a re-selection process.
In the wireless environment, a known standard referred to as the IS-136 Standard defines protocols for digital wireless communications involving digital mobile stations. That standard defines a process by which the mobile station can re-select a control channel as it moves among the cells. In that process the mobile station is presumed to be “camped-on” to a first control channel. That control channel then transmits a list of the neighboring control channels, that is the list of control channels for the neighboring cells (or service providers). The mobile station receives the list and stores it. Then in accordance with a prescribed algorithm, the mobile station determines which one of the control channels on the list constitutes the primary candidate for re-selection. This determination is made based on such things as reading the RF (Radio Frequency) level of the various control channels in the list and determining which is the control channel that the mobile station should try to select next. For example, if the mobile station was in cell C
2
moving towards cell C
1
, it may detect that the next strongest control channel among the neighbors of cell C
2
originates from base station BS
1
, and therefore would deem that control channel to be the primary candidate for re-selection.
Further, in accordance with the algorithm described in the IS-136 standard once a primary candidate has been determined the mobile station attempts to re-select to that control channel. If that re-selection attempt is successful, then the mobile station camps onto the new control channel, receives a new list of neighboring control channels and begins the process all over with the new list of neighbors. If the attempt is unsuccessful, then the mobile station either selects the next appropriate candidate channel (that is a secondary candidate channel) or repeats the analysis of the entire list of candidate channels attempting to determine another primary candidate channel for re-selection.
A problem arises in that when the mobile station receives the neighbor list, it may include control channels with which the mobile station is simply incompatible. For example, the list may include one or more channels that are related to private systems and a mobile station may not be permitted access to those private systems. Alternatively, the mobile station may be seeking voice service and the control channels may be directed to data or fax services. Nonetheless, based on the parameters used in the analysis algorithm, these control channels with which the mobile station cannot truly interact are included in the analysis operation and one of these incompatible control channels could be selected as the primary candidate control channel. Naturally when this occurs, the attempt to re-select to that control channel will fail. Thus, the execution of the process has wasted time and resources toward the attempt to re-select an incompatible control channel. Furthermore, under the known algorithms, once the attempt to re-select to the incompatible control channel has failed that channel is still included in the next cycle of the re-selection process and could be once again selected as the primary candidate control channel. It is conceivable that the mobile station could get caught in an extended loop of determining an incompatible control channel to be the primary candidate control channel and making a failed attempt to re-select to that control channel.
In view of the shortcomings of the known re-selection process, it is desirable to provide further controls in the re-selection process to avoid the attempt to re-select to incompatible control channels. It is also desirable to avoid second attempts to re-select to control channels which are determined to be incompatible with the mobile station during a re-select attempt.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention a mobile station performs a method for controlling the re-selection of a control channel. In that method the mobile station, prior to performing any algorithm for selecting a primary candidate control channel, marks as ineligible, any one of the control channels identified on the neighbor list which are incompatible with the mobile station. The selection of a primary control channel then proceeds only with regard to those control channels which are determined to be eligible. Once a primary candidate control channel is selected the mobile station attempts to re-select to that primary candidate control channel. If the attempt to re-select is successful, then the mobile station camps on to this control channel. If, however, the attempt fails, then the mobile station determines why the attempt failed. If the failure arises from an incompatibility between the mobile station and the control channel, then that control channel is marked as ineligible in the neighbor list and when the re-selection process is repeated with the same neighbor list, since that control channel has been marked as ineligible it will not be a factor in the selection of a primary candidate control channel.
Examples of incompatibility are as follows. The mobile station may not have any access privileges with regard to private systems. In this case, the mobile station would scan the neighbor list and mark as ineligible any control channel identified as being related to a private system since the mobile station will not be permitted access to such systems. Alternatively, the mobile station may have access to only one private system. In such a case, then if a primary candidate control channel is a private system channel and the mobile station is not determined to have access to that particular private system, then the attempt to re-select to the private system will fail and the neighbor list will be modified to reflect that fact that this channel is not eligible for analysis in a subsequent re-selection process.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4612415 (1986-09-01), Zdunek et al.
patent: 4905301 (1990-02-01), Krolopp et al.
patent: 5276905 (1994-01-01), Hurst et al.
patent: 5329575 (1994-07-01), Matsuda
patent: 5353332 (1994-10-01), Raith et al.
patent: 5363428 (1994-11-01), Nagashima
patent: 5408684 (1995-04-01), Yunoki et al.
patent: 5442680 (1995-08-01), Schellinger et al.
patent: 5551058 (1996-08-01), Hutcheson et al.
patent: 5640677 (1997-06-01), Karlsson
patent: 5754959 (1998-05-01), Ueno et al.
patent: 5774807 (1998-06-01), Yazaki et al.
patent: 5778316 (1998-07-01), Persson et al.
patent: 5794147 (1998-08-01), Huang
patent: 5794157 (1998-08-01), Haartsen
p
AT&T Wireless Services Inc.
Cumming William
LandOfFree
Method for controlling channel reselection does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method for controlling channel reselection, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for controlling channel reselection will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2980821